On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 10:34 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> ---
> en/winedev-coding.sgml | 9 -
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
There's a typo in
-block of code.
+block of code and it makes sure the code get's maintained.
get's => gets
--
Frédéric Delanoy
Frédéric Delanoy writes:
> That's just replacing the Tabs by spaces in the affected lines. The
> affected lines were using a mix of tabs and spaces
>
> It's indented two spaces from the parent listitem tag as it was before
> (at least when tabs are displayed as 4 chars)
>
> Should I keep those t
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> Frédéric Delanoy writes:
>
>> @@ -710,17 +714,18 @@ Path="c:\windows;c:\windows\system;e:\;e:\test;f:\"
>> choose between several edition modes:
>>
>>
>> -
Frédéric Delanoy writes:
> @@ -710,17 +714,18 @@ Path="c:\windows;c:\windows\system;e:\;e:\test;f:\"
> choose between several edition modes:
>
>
> -
> - Emacs: the same keybind
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
[...]
> -ALLFORMATS = html pdf sgml ps txt
> +ALLFORMATS = html pdf ps txt
'make sgml' can be used to generate the translated SGML source files for
our many documentation translations. So I don't think this patch should
be applied.
--
Francois Gouge
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Frédéric Delanoy
wrote:
> ---
> Make.rules.in | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Make.rules.in b/Make.rules.in
> index fda8e81..d326247 100644
> --- a/Make.rules.in
> +++ b/Make.rules.in
> @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ dummy:
>
> # Man
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:50 PM, Julian Rüger wrote:
> Hi Frédéric,
>
>> - $(CC) $(CC_OPTS) -DRC_INVOKED -E -x c $< | $(WRC) -N $(WRCFLAGS)
>> $(WINELIB_FLAGS) -o $@
>> + $(CC) $(CC_OPTS) -DRC_INVOKED -E -x c $lt; | $(WRC) -N $(WRCFLAGS)
>> $(WINELIB_FLAGS) -o $@
>
> looks like you forgo
Hi Frédéric,
> - $(CC) $(CC_OPTS) -DRC_INVOKED -E -x c $< | $(WRC) -N $(WRCFLAGS)
> $(WINELIB_FLAGS) -o $@
> + $(CC) $(CC_OPTS) -DRC_INVOKED -E -x c $lt; | $(WRC) -N $(WRCFLAGS)
> $(WINELIB_FLAGS) -o $@
looks like you forgot the "&".
Best,
Julian
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 7:41 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> ---
> en/winedev-architecture.sgml | 56
> ++--
> en/winedev-debugger.sgml | 10
> en/winedev-kernel.sgml | 24 +--
> en/winedev-multimedia.sgml | 36 +++
On 03.07.2013 00:02, Frédéric Delanoy wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:39 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
>> ---
>> en/winedev-debugger.sgml | 269
>> ++-
>> 1 file changed, 222 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/en/winedev-debugger.sgml b/
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:39 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> ---
> en/winedev-debugger.sgml | 269
> ++-
> 1 file changed, 222 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/en/winedev-debugger.sgml b/en/winedev-debugger.sgml
> index b877063..31046c0 100
Am 06.03.2012 06:13, schrieb Saulius Krasuckas:
> * On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, André Hentschel wrote:
>>
>> en/winedev-otherdebug.sgml | 170
>>
>> 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> ...
>>
>> For a further in depth desc
* On Mon, 5 Mar 2012, André Hentschel wrote:
>
> en/winedev-otherdebug.sgml | 170
>
> 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
...
>
> For a further in depth description of gcov, the official gcc
> compiler sui
André Hentschel writes:
> ---
> en/winedev-otherdebug.sgml | 170
>
> 1 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
It doesn't build:
docbook2html -u winedev-guide.sgml
Using catalogs: /etc/sgml/catalog
Using stylesheet: /usr/share/docbook-u
On 07/23/2011 07:05 PM, James McKenzie wrote:
On 7/23/11 3:33 PM, Andrew Eikum wrote:
On 07/23/2011 05:02 PM, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, André Hentschel wrote:
[...]
-Code is usually limited to 80 columns. This helps prevent
-mailers mangling patches by line wra
André Hentschel wrote:
> Am 24.07.2011 00:02, schrieb Francois Gouget:
>> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, André Hentschel wrote:
>> [...]
>>> - Code is usually limited to 80 columns. This helps prevent
>>> - mailers mangling patches by line wrap. Also it generally
>>> + Code is usually limite
Am 24.07.2011 00:02, schrieb Francois Gouget:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, André Hentschel wrote:
> [...]
>> -Code is usually limited to 80 columns. This helps prevent
>> -mailers mangling patches by line wrap. Also it generally
>> +Code is usually limited to 100 columns. It genera
On 7/23/11 3:33 PM, Andrew Eikum wrote:
On 07/23/2011 05:02 PM, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, André Hentschel wrote:
[...]
-Code is usually limited to 80 columns. This helps prevent
-mailers mangling patches by line wrap. Also it generally
+Code is usually l
I believe Julliard already mentioned the column limit was bumped up (I
believe it was actually 120?). 1024 resolution isn't exactly "typical"
anymore, even for laptops - most developers I know actually have more
than one screen nowadays. As for terminal emulators, they may default
at 80 but that ca
On 07/23/2011 05:02 PM, Francois Gouget wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, André Hentschel wrote:
[...]
- Code is usually limited to 80 columns. This helps prevent
- mailers mangling patches by line wrap. Also it generally
+ Code is usually limited to 100 columns. It genera
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, André Hentschel wrote:
[...]
> - Code is usually limited to 80 columns. This helps prevent
> - mailers mangling patches by line wrap. Also it generally
> + Code is usually limited to 100 columns. It generally
I'd prefer to keep the 80 columns recommandat
Am 27.06.2011 11:55, schrieb Jerome Leclanche:
> That sounds like we want people to avoid testing wine. How about
> "Patches must not break building Wine nor its testsuite. Adding dead
> code should also be avoided."?
Yes, sounds better.
--
Best Regards, André Hentschel
That sounds like we want people to avoid testing wine. How about
"Patches must not break building Wine nor its testsuite. Adding dead
code should also be avoided."?
J. Leclanche
2011/6/26 André Hentschel :
> ---
> en/winedev-coding.sgml | 4
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 dele
Le jeudi 20 octobre 2005 à 00:28 +0200, Jonathan Ernst a écrit :
> Le mardi 18 octobre 2005 à 09:55 -0600, Brian Vincent a écrit :
> > On 10/14/05, Brian Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> >
> > One thing that would be nice to have is a complete list of registry
> > keys and values. Bon
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Ernst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For more informations about DLL overrides, please refer to section 3.1.2.1
of this guide.
This 3.1.2.1 is likely to change, can we have a symbolic reference instead?
--
Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lattica, Inc.
Le mardi 18 octobre 2005 à 09:55 -0600, Brian Vincent a écrit :
> On 10/14/05, Brian Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
>
> One thing that would be nice to have is a complete list of registry
> keys and values. Bonus points for explaining what they do. It's not
> terribly difficult to gene
On 10/14/05, Brian Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't want to step on any toes, but I plan on redoing the User Guide
> this weekend. Mostly it'll just be an extension of the existing stuff
> I wrote and bringing it up to date. I figure I can probably bang it
> out in a few hours.
Just
Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Well I *thought* I had-- I renamed my current .wine directory (I have
> several previous renamed .wine directories in my ~/ folder; the names
> all start with .wine, though, such as .wine.borked, .wine.borkedmaybe,
> .wine.old and the like. I try to pres
Alexandre Julliard schreef:
> Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> I was installing Icewind Dale, and like all games and
>> Wine-installed programs, I meant to install to the partition I have
>> set aside for that purpose, which is mounted to /usr/local/games,
>> with a symlink in my
Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was installing Icewind Dale, and like all games and Wine-installed
> programs, I meant to install to the partition I have set aside for that
> purpose, which is mounted to /usr/local/games, with a symlink in my home
> directory. So naturally I usually
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 22:01 +0200, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Obviously I know how to get around this, having just done so, but is
> this appropriate to document?
I have no idea why you encountered that sort of behavior, but it
doesn't seem right. Unless Alexandre tells us this is the way
it should wo
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 13:38 +0200, Francois Gouget wrote:
> Hmm, you forgot to regenerate the configure script.
My bad, fixed. Thanks.
--
Dimi Paun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lattica, Inc.
Dimi Paun wrote:
[...]
Modified files:
. : configure.ac
Log message:
Francois Gouget <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Warn the user if docbook2html is missing. Offer hints as to which
packages he needs to install.
Old revision New revision Changes Path
1.2
On January 1, 2004 12:20 pm, Ivan Leo Murray-Smith wrote:
> in getting.sgml, I've recently changed a few things in it, but there isn't
> a cvs.sgml file, should this warning go?
Yes, it should, cvs.sgml is no longer. But there may be things
on WineHQ that may need updating instead.
--
Dimi.
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, Marcelo Duarte wrote:
[...]
> In this list, some times I see acronyms that I do not understand, some I try
> to imagine. For the majority of the people who had not been born speaking
> English this also must be complicated.
Don't worry. Most off-line english-speaking people ha
Marcelo Duarte wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Pouech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
Eric, a lot of stuff in here looks like it's in
need of some TLC, if you can take a look...
TLC ? tender & loving care
- Original Message -
From: "Eric Pouech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> > Eric, a lot of stuff in here looks like it's in
> > need of some TLC, if you can take a look...
> TLC ? tender & loving care
> is that what you're look
On September 21, 2003 02:44 pm, Eric Pouech wrote:
> is that what you're looking for ? (even if everything is not filled in yet)
Yes, thanks! Now it's up to Alexandre to merge everything in,
and then I'll review it again to see where we stand.
--
Dimi.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> I'm not sure I agree with that. If we make the documentation available
> for download then we should have the FAQ there too, we shouldn't
> require people to go to WineHQ to get it.
I don't know, it maybe just me, for I never expect to see FAQs wi
"Dimitrie O. Paun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The fact that the FAQ is now SGML does not warant
> building it in all sorts of formats, and including
> it in the docs tarball. Just because we can, does
> not mean we should.
>
> In fact, theoretically we should move this over
> to the lostwages/
40 matches
Mail list logo
