On 26 June 2013 03:53, Austin English wrote:
> My understanding was that using the _WIN64 macro was preferred. I can
> certainly do that instead. How's this?
>
I could probably live with that, though perhaps make it a helper
function, and I'm not entirely sure this will print something
meaningful
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> On 23 June 2013 07:10, Austin English wrote:
>> Please consider applying before the release of 1.6. It has no
>> functional changes, but would really help when diagnosing user
>> problems.
>>
> This is not really a wined3d patch. That said,
On 23 June 2013 07:10, Austin English wrote:
> Please consider applying before the release of 1.6. It has no
> functional changes, but would really help when diagnosing user
> problems.
>
This is not really a wined3d patch. That said, while I agree that
printing the architecture would be useful he
