The only use of these platforms was three mistaken
bug reports that probably wanted PC. I don't see
any reason to keep these old system types around
any more.
OK to remove?
(Suggested in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13363 )
The only use of these platforms was three mistaken
bug reports that probably wanted PC. I don't see
any reason to keep these old system types around
any more.
OK to remove?
(Suggested in http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13363 )
Please.
--Juan
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
The only use of these platforms was three mistaken
bug reports that probably wanted PC. I don't see
any reason to keep these old system types around
any more.
OK to remove?
(Suggested in
I don't suppose you've changed your mind on also removing the obsolete
OS's (BSDI, AIX, IRIX, HP-UX, SunOS, OS/2, Mac OS X 10.3)?
Did he say he wasn't for it? I didn't catch that. Dan, here's a vote
for removing those. I can't comment on all of them, but SunOS has
been obsolete for a
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't suppose you've changed your mind on also removing the obsolete
OS's (BSDI, AIX, IRIX, HP-UX, SunOS, OS/2, Mac OS X 10.3)?
Did he say he wasn't for it? I didn't catch that. Dan, here's a vote
for removing those.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't suppose you've changed your mind on also removing the obsolete
OS's (BSDI, AIX, IRIX, HP-UX, SunOS, OS/2, Mac OS X 10.3)?
Did he say he wasn't for it? I didn't catch that. Dan, here's a vote
for removing those.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Juan Lang juan.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't suppose you've changed your mind on also removing the obsolete
OS's (BSDI, AIX, IRIX, HP-UX, SunOS, OS/2, Mac OS X 10.3)?
Did he say he wasn't for
Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
It can make a big difference in the bug. The X.org version in OS X
(partially?) depends on what OS X version you have. Some bugs will
only show up in Tiger, because Leopard has
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov
dmi...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
It can make a big difference in the bug. The X.org version in OS X
(partially?) depends on what
Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
It can make a big difference in the bug. The X.org version in OS X
(partially?) depends on what OS X version you have. Some bugs will
only show up in Tiger, because Leopard has them fixed on Apple's end.
(Someone correct me
On May 29, 2009, at 12:18 PM, Austin English wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov
dmi...@codeweavers.com wrote:
Austin English austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
It can make a big difference in the bug.
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 10:51 AM, James Mckenzie
jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net wrote:
Why do we have versions on Mac OS X? How about we combine them all?
It can make a big difference in the bug. The X.org version in OS X
(partially?) depends on what OS X version you have. ...
As far as OS/2
12 matches
Mail list logo
