Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-08 Thread Jacek Caban
Vitaliy Margolen wrote: Jacek Caban wrote: Hi all, The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Yes it did and some are still not fixed. Flash does not work anymore on all the pages. This really needs to be fixed. I've been looking on it for a while and I didn't find

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-07 Thread Vitaliy Margolen
Jacek Caban wrote: Hi all, The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Yes it did and some are still not fixed. Flash does not work anymore on all the pages. This really needs to be fixed. The plugin came from windows Firefox 3.0.5 where it works fine (under Wine). Vitaliy.

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-06 Thread Austin English
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Jerome Leclanche adys...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote: James Mckenzie wrote: It depends on the timeline for the 1.2 release. If this is a long way off, it may be worth the effort. I don't know. The 1.1 branch

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-06 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:13:48PM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote: Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote: The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires a

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread Alistair Leslie-Hughes
Hi Jacek, Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com wrote in message news:498a2a37.6070...@codeweavers.com... Hi all, Also the last debug version was accidentally stripped. It will be fixed in this release. I'm planning to do the release tomorrow, so it will be in Git on Friday. I've test a few

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread Paul TBBle Hampson
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote: The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread Jacek Caban
Scott Ritchie wrote: Jacek Caban wrote: Hi all, The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread James Mckenzie
Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com wrote: Scott Ritchie wrote: Jacek Caban wrote: Hi all, The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread Jacek Caban
James Mckenzie wrote: Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com wrote: Scott Ritchie wrote: Is this version compatible with Wine 1.0.1 by chance? No, it's technically impossible. Is it possible to build a patch upgrade to 1.0.1 to incorporate the new Gecko or will we

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread Rico Schüller
Paul TBBle Hampson schrieb: On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote: The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread Jacek Caban
Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 12:52:23AM +0100, Jacek Caban wrote: The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to:

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread James Mckenzie
Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com wrote: Sent: Feb 5, 2009 12:28 PM To: James Mckenzie jjmckenzi...@earthlink.net Cc: Scott Ritchie sc...@open-vote.org, wine-devel wine-devel@winehq.org Subject: Re: New Wine Gecko package James Mckenzie wrote: Jacek Caban ja...@codeweavers.com wrote: Scott

re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread Dan Kegel
James Mckenzie wrote: It depends on the timeline for the 1.2 release. If this is a long way off, it may be worth the effort. I don't know. The 1.1 branch has are lots of improvements people want; what's so special about Gecko? IMHO we should leave the 1.0 branch alone, and just get on with

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-05 Thread Jerome Leclanche
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Dan Kegel d...@kegel.com wrote: James Mckenzie wrote: It depends on the timeline for the 1.2 release. If this is a long way off, it may be worth the effort. I don't know. The 1.1 branch has are lots of improvements people want; what's so special about Gecko?

New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-04 Thread Jacek Caban
Hi all, The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to: http://gerwazy.lo3.wroc.pl/~jcaban/wine/wine_gecko-0.9.1.cab I'd appreciate if people that observe

Re: New Wine Gecko package

2009-02-04 Thread Scott Ritchie
Jacek Caban wrote: Hi all, The last release of Wine Gecko caused a few regressions. Thanks to Alexandre, we've found the reason. The bad news is that the fix requires a new package. I've uploaded RC build to: http://gerwazy.lo3.wroc.pl/~jcaban/wine/wine_gecko-0.9.1.cab I'd appreciate