We have a high performance (milliseconds count) server on which I'd like to
install WinPCAP to capture some system interactions. Doing the capture
externally to the machine is not feasible at this time.
However, I am hesitate to install WinPCAP for fear that its kernel packet
driver might
The WinPcap driver does a per-capture-instance binding on the underlying
networking architecture. This means that if you are not capturing, WinPcap
is not connected to the flow of packets in the networking stack, at all.
When you capture, the WinPcap driver is seen by the system as a protocol, so
Possibly unrelated information: I tested Wincap 3.1 beta3 on windows server
2003 and was dropping about 50% of packets... vs no loss at all for 3.0.
Machine was brand new Dell P4 2.8GHz.
+Steve
- Original Message -
From: terry braun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
I haven't tried Service pack 2, yet.
What problems are you encountering?
Have a nice day
GV
- Original Message -
From: terry braun [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2004 3:59 PM
Subject: [WinPcap-users] xp service pack 2 and winpcap3.1 beta 3
Does
