Hello,
I have noticed that adding a route (allowedips) to a peer
automatically removes any such route from other peers,
as has been explained in some email.
It seems to me as unexpected behaviour, as I wouldn't expect
the configuration of a peer to be (silently) affected when
changing the configu
:whew:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey Dave,
>
> You're exactly the sort of person I've been hoping would appear during the
> last several months.
The bufferbloat project has had a lot of people randomly show up at
the party to make a contribution, getting a lit
> well, you should see ect(3) if you pound the network interface. Things
> like tcp small queues get in the way so you won't see it with a simple
> single flow test against cake/codel/etc.
>
> something like 4 netperfs will do it.
It works!
01:40:57.962131 IP (tos 0x3,CE, ttl 64, id 51647, offset
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> Nice to see you so quickly being productive. I am still constructing a
>> reply to your previous message.
>
> Awaiting it's arrival :)
>
>> In re-reading over your message, I think not dropping the packet when
>> there is an outer CE ma
well, you should see ect(3) if you pound the network interface. Things
like tcp small queues get in the way so you won't see it with a simple
single flow test against cake/codel/etc.
something like 4 netperfs will do it.
Since you are so fast at getting code running, I think you'll like
flent as
> Nice to see you so quickly being productive. I am still constructing a
> reply to your previous message.
Awaiting it's arrival :)
> In re-reading over your message, I think not dropping the packet when
> there is an outer CE marking and no ecn enabling in in the inner
> packet is probably the r
To try and answer your actual questions...
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> So I implemented a first stab of this, which I intend to refine with
> your feedback:
>
>
> https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/commit/?id=a2dfc902e942cce8d5da4a42d6aa384413e7fc
Nice to see you so quickly being productive. I am still constructing a
reply to your previous message.
Rather than try to expand your macros, my mental model on encode is
if(inner_dscp & 3) outer_dscp = (outer_dscp & 3) | (inner_dscp & 3);
decode is different. A bad actor could, for example, fli
Hi again,
So I implemented a first stab of this, which I intend to refine with
your feedback:
https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/commit/?id=a2dfc902e942cce8d5da4a42d6aa384413e7fc81
On the way out, the ECN is set to:
outgoing_skb->tos = encap_ecn(0, inner_skb->tos);
where encap_ecn is define
Hey Dave,
You're exactly the sort of person I've been hoping would appear during the
last several months. Indeed there's a lot of interesting queueing things
happening with WireGuard. I'll detail them inline below.
> I have been running a set of tinc based vpns for a long time now, and
> based on
10 matches
Mail list logo
