On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 7:35 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 13:38 +, Simon Rozman wrote:
> > Hi David,This is my proposal:
> > https://git.zx2c4.com/wintun/commit/?id=eebd6aea4f75551f6e847a1d4fff857450bac6e9
> > Awaiting review and zx2c4 approval.
> > Regards, Simon
>
>
> Lo
> On Apr 10, 2021, at 10:59 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:27:23 -0500
> Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
>
>> I have been testing the T-Mobile Home Internet (4G/5G fixed wireless)
>> service to a Linode VM via WireGuard.
>>
>> The TMHI service uses CGNAT plus an additional NAT
Hi Mo,
I have the latest hardware (gray cylinder)
--
Typically 3 of 5 bars
4G Band: B2
5G Band: n71
--
Note the huge jitter only occurs inbound, which is difficult to measure without
using WireGuard.
The same UDP iperf3 tests outbound (gw-lan->linode) range from 3 to 8 ms
jitter, regardless of
On Sat, 10 Apr 2021 10:27:23 -0500
Lonnie Abelbeck wrote:
> I have been testing the T-Mobile Home Internet (4G/5G fixed wireless) service
> to a Linode VM via WireGuard.
>
> The TMHI service uses CGNAT plus an additional NAT in their modem/gateway
> with a MTU of 1420, so WireGuard is configur
Thanks for sharing, I have also been running WG tunnels over T-Mobile home
internet and haven’t seen any of the jitter you are reporting.
Did you try the same tests (outbound) without running them via WG?
Which modem do you have? How many signal bars are you getting? Also, what does
an non-tunn
Greetings,
I have been testing the T-Mobile Home Internet (4G/5G fixed wireless) service
to a Linode VM via WireGuard.
The TMHI service uses CGNAT plus an additional NAT in their modem/gateway with
a MTU of 1420, so WireGuard is configured with a 1340 MTU.
Everything works, but I thought I wou
On Sat, 2021-04-10 at 13:38 +, Simon Rozman wrote:
> Hi David,This is my proposal:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/wintun/commit/?id=eebd6aea4f75551f6e847a1d4fff857450bac6e9
> Awaiting review and zx2c4 approval. 😊
> Regards, Simon
Looks good to me; thanks. Just need to work out how to cross-build it
Hi team,
I'm using the version 0.3.9 and it's working fine for now except that I need
to put the end user (domain User) inside the local admin group to make it
work .
Please note that with a PC not join to a domain , wireguard is running fine
with a local user wich is member of "Network operator
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 9:59 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
> Hm, your description doesn't match the code I see at that link.
>
> You're using GetAdaptersAddresses() which gives you the UP/DOWN status
> as well as the addresses, and you iterate over those. The loop is
>
> ∀ adapter, ∀ Unicast address o
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 10:10 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 09:42 -0700, Daniel Lenski wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:37 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
> > > If we do need a header larger than 4 bytes, then we are forced to do
> > > things properly by adding support in the kern
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 7:37 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
> =
> PPP over DTLS
> =
>
> We just added support for the PPP-based protocols (Fortinet, F5) and
> I'm not sure we even know what the DTLS-based version looks like on the
> wire, do we? If the header is 4 bytes or few
On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 1:46 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
> Unless netsh will do it for us when we ask *it* to set the IP address?
> OpenConnect doesn't normally bother itself with administrivia like setting IP
> addresses; its job is to pass packets.
I'm afraid not. I tried playing around with var
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 4:49 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
> If WintunSendPacket took an additional 'offset' argument to disregard a
> certain number of bytes at the beginning of the buffer, that would
> probably suffice. Or is it possible to simply add to the pointer
> returned by WintunAllocateSendPa
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 1:18 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2021-04-06 at 18:17 -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > With regards to permissions, you must be Local System, which is
> > already the case if you're running inside a service. If you'd like to
> > run as a mere Administrator proce
On Tue, Apr 6, 2021 at 5:17 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> It's pretty typical behavior on Windows for IP addresses to be
> exclusive per interface. WireGuard for Windows does something similar:
> https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-windows/tree/tunnel/addressconfig.go#n22
Thank you! That's very inte
Hi David,This is my
proposal:https://git.zx2c4.com/wintun/commit/?id=eebd6aea4f75551f6e847a1d4fff857450bac6e9Awaiting
review and zx2c4 approval. 😊Regards, Simon
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
On Thu, 2021-04-08 at 10:53 -0700, Daniel Lenski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 9:59 AM David Woodhouse wrote:
> > Hm, your description doesn't match the code I see at that link.
> >
> > You're using GetAdaptersAddresses() which gives you the UP/DOWN status
> > as well as the addresses, and you
17 matches
Mail list logo
