CentOS Stream 8 by now (4.18.0-301.1.el8) reports RHEL_MINOR=5. The
current RHEL 8 minor release is still 3. RHEL 8.4 is in beta. Replace
equal comparison by greater equal to (hopefully) be a little bit more
future proof.
Signed-off-by: Peter Georg
---
src/compat/compat-asm.h | 2 +-
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:55:18PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>
> > Is there a reason why to disregard the IF_MULTICAST flag? This seems to me
> > more like a bug in FreeBSD Wireguard implementation that should be fixed
> > there. Is this flag properly checked
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 03:44:50PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> The babel protocol code was checking interfaces for the IF_MULTICAST flag
> and refusing to run if this isn't present. However, there are cases where
> this flag doesn't correspond to the actual capability of sending
The BSD code did not propagate the OS-level IFF_MULTICAST flag to the
Bird-internal IF_MULTICAST flag, which causes problems with Wireguard
interfaces on FreeBSD. The Linux sysdep code does propagate the flag
already, so just copy over the same check and flag update.
Tested-by: Stefan Haller
Stefan Haller writes:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:42:58PM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:42 PM Stefan Haller wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:25:46PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> > > Stefan, any chance you could test this patch to Bird
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 01:42:58PM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:42 PM Stefan Haller wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:25:46PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > > Stefan, any chance you could test this patch to Bird (*instead of* the
> > > previous
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:42 PM Stefan Haller wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:25:46PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> > Stefan, any chance you could test this patch to Bird (*instead of* the
> > previous one that removes the check from the Babel code)?
>
> The patch is working on
On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 08:25:46PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Stefan, any chance you could test this patch to Bird (*instead of* the
> previous one that removes the check from the Babel code)?
The patch is working on FreeBSD 13.0.
Kind regards,
Stefan
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen writes:
> Stefan Haller writes:
>
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:05:03PM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>>> I spent the day playing around with bird and babel and sorted out
>>> FreeBSD's v6 situation. Basically, ff00::/8 addresses are treated
>>>
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 03:55:18PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Ondrej Zajicek writes:
>>
>> > Is there a reason why to disregard the IF_MULTICAST flag? This seems to me
>> > more like a bug in FreeBSD Wireguard implementation that should be fixed
>> >
Ondrej Zajicek writes:
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 03:44:50PM +0200, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> The babel protocol code was checking interfaces for the IF_MULTICAST flag
>> and refusing to run if this isn't present. However, there are cases where
>> this flag doesn't correspond to the actual
11 matches
Mail list logo