On 12/9/19 5:49 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I'd definitely be interested in this. Back in 2015, that was the plan.
> Then it took a long time to get to where we are now, and since then
> wg(8) has really evolved into its own useful thing. The easiest thing
> would be to move wg(8) wholesale
On 11/15/16 7:45 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
>> @@ -1012,6 +1013,16 @@ static int ip6_dst_lookup_tail(struct net *net,
>> const struct sock *sk,
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> +addr_type = ipv6_addr_type(>saddr);
>> +if (addr_type == IPv6_ADDR_ANY)
>> +return
On 11/14/16 10:33 AM, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> I just also quickly read up on the history (sorry was travelling last
> week) and wonder if you ever saw a user space facing bug or if this is
> basically some difference you saw while writing out of tree code?
I checked the
easy to use the same error handlers for both cases.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>
>> Cc: David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> Changes from v2:
>> It turns out ipv6_chk_addr already has the device e
feld <ja...@zx2c4.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> Changes from v2:
> It turns out ipv6_chk_addr already has the device enumeration
> logic that we need by simply passing NULL.
>
> net/ipv6/ip6_output.c | 4
> 1 file changed
Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <d...@cumulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> Changes from v1:
>This moves the check to the top and now sees if it's a valid address
>on _any_ device, not just the one in dst.
>
> include/net/ipv6.h| 2 ++
> net
On 11/11/16 12:29 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> If I'm replying to a UDP packet, I generally want to use a source
> address that's the same as the destination address of the packet to
> which I'm replying. For example:
>
> Peer A sends packet: src = 10.0.0.1, dst = 10.0.0.3
>
