Dear NSA,
No.
Love,
Jason
___
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
Are there any plans, or would you even consider, adding an option to
WireGuard to disable encryption, and only authenticate packets? I'm
assuming that an authentication-only mode would be significantly faster
(maybe I'm wrong though). My use-case only needs auth, so if I were to
use WireGuard, the
> On 5 Oct, 2016, at 16:59, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> UDP floods are a concern, of
> course, but CoDel doesn't deal well with those at all, so you'd probably
> want a different mechanism for that.
Cake happens to have addressed the UDP flood problem by combining Codel with
BLUE.I c
"Jason A. Donenfeld" writes:
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> You don't need a timer. You already have a signal for when more queue
>> space is available in the encryption step: When a packet finishes
>> encryption. All you need to do is try to enqueue another o
On Sun, Oct 2, 2016 at 1:31 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> You don't need a timer. You already have a signal for when more queue
> space is available in the encryption step: When a packet finishes
> encryption. All you need to do is try to enqueue another one at this
> point.
Oh, silly me. Y
