Re: [WireGuard] Source address fib invalidation on IPv6

2016-11-11 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hi David, On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 11:14 PM, David Ahern wrote: > What do you mean by 'valid dst'? ipv6 returns net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry on > lookup failures so yes dst is non-NULL but that does not mean the lookup > succeeded. What I mean is that it returns an ordinary dst, as if that souce ad

Re: [WireGuard] Source address fib invalidation on IPv6

2016-11-11 Thread David Ahern
On 11/11/16 12:29 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi folks, > > If I'm replying to a UDP packet, I generally want to use a source > address that's the same as the destination address of the packet to > which I'm replying. For example: > > Peer A sends packet: src = 10.0.0.1, dst = 10.0.0.3 > Pee

[WireGuard] Source address fib invalidation on IPv6

2016-11-11 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hi folks, If I'm replying to a UDP packet, I generally want to use a source address that's the same as the destination address of the packet to which I'm replying. For example: Peer A sends packet: src = 10.0.0.1, dst = 10.0.0.3 Peer B replies with: src = 10.0.0.3, dst = 10.0.0.1 But let's comp

Re: [WireGuard] OpenWRT/MIPS Improvements

2016-11-11 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hey n3ph, I have actually managed to reproduce the OOM situation in the latest snapshot, which I'll be looking into addressing. More soon. Regards, Jason On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 8:04 AM, n3ph wrote: > > Hello Jason! > > I was reading the maillist carefully the last weeks and am very happy to >