Re: [WireGuard] Seeking Ubuntu PPA Maintainer

Hey Daniel, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >https://qa.debian.org/madison.php?package=wireguard Perfect, thanks. I wound up using: https://qa.debian.org/madison.php?package=wireguard=debian===on==on And then I just match on the capture

Re: [WireGuard] RFE: A notion of VERSION (was: Debugging AllowedIps)

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Thu 2016-11-17 02:40:30 +0900, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> Trying again with no line breaks: >> > Please don't assume that the source code is built from a git repository. > On debian, we build from the

Re: [WireGuard] RFE: A notion of VERSION (was: Debugging AllowedIps)

On Thu 2016-11-17 02:40:30 +0900, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Trying again with no line breaks: > >> WIREGUARD_VERSION := $(shell parent_name=$$(readlink -f .. | sed -n >> 's:.*/[wW]ire[Gg]uard[a-z-]*-\([0-9.]\+\)$$:\1:p'); if [ -d ../.git ]; then >> echo "git-$$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)";

[WireGuard] [ANNOUNCE] Snapshot `experimental-0.0.20161116.1` Available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, A new experimental snapshot, `experimental-0.0.20161116.1`, has been tagged in the git repository. Please note that this snapshot is, like the rest of the project at this point in time, experimental, and does not consitute a real release

Re: [WireGuard] [PATCH] kernel: enable pcrypt

On 2016-11-16 20:35, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hi Felix, > > Patchwork was changed to "accepted" -- > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/694517/ -- but this hasn't shown up > in the actual LEDE repo. What's up? It's in my staging tree and will make it to the main repo soon. - Felix

Re: [WireGuard] [PATCH] kernel: enable pcrypt

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Felix Fietkau wrote: > It's in my staging tree and will make it to the main repo soon. Good to hear. Thanks. ___ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com

Re: [WireGuard] [PATCH] kernel: enable pcrypt

Hi Felix, Patchwork was changed to "accepted" -- http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/694517/ -- but this hasn't shown up in the actual LEDE repo. What's up? Jason ___ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com

Re: [WireGuard] Wireguard in OpenWRT/LEDE: FYI: Pull Request

Live on wireguard.io/install/ now: > commit 6bd5f8cde97456e37415eab80c19d9e8241f7639 > Author: Jason A. Donenfeld > Date: Wed Nov 16 18:44:17 2016 +0100 > > Add openwrt docs > > diff --git a/docs/install.md b/docs/install.md > index 0946182..98579e9 100644 > ---

Re: [WireGuard] RFE: A notion of VERSION (was: Debugging AllowedIps)

The best I could come with: > WIREGUARD_VERSION := $(shell parent_name=$$(readlink -f .. | sed -n > 's:.*/[wW]ire[Gg]uard[a-z-]*-\([0-9.]\+\)$$:\1:p'); if [ -d ../.git ]; then > echo "git-$$(git rev-parse --shor t HEAD)"; elif [ -n $parent_name ]; then echo "$$parent_name"; else echo

Re: [WireGuard] Wireguard in OpenWRT/LEDE: FYI: Pull Request

> The config value has to be the same to correlate them. In that case, > you should show an example with multiple peers, so that it's clear > what's happening. It says "Peer configurations are managed via one or more wireguard_ sections." to introduce the example. However, won't hurt to add

Re: [WireGuard] Wireguard in OpenWRT/LEDE: FYI: Pull Request

> On 16 Nov 2016, at 17:56, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > config wireguard_foo > > --> > > config wireguard_peer1 Unfortunately, not. All peers for iface 'foo' will be named wireguard_foo. UCI sections are iterable if they have the same name. wireguard_peer1 could belong

Re: [WireGuard] Wireguard in OpenWRT/LEDE: FYI: Pull Request

Oh, I see, that's not actually a correct suggestion. The config value has to be the same to correlate them. In that case, you should show an example with multiple peers, so that it's clear what's happening. ___ WireGuard mailing list

Re: [WireGuard] Wireguard in OpenWRT/LEDE: FYI: Pull Request

config wireguard_foo --> config wireguard_peer1 ___ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

Re: [WireGuard] Wireguard in OpenWRT/LEDE: FYI: Pull Request

> If somebody has time, it would be good to include one or two examples at > the end of the page (otherwise I'll do it at some point). This one OK? https://wiki.lede-project.org/docs/user-guide/tunneling_interface_protocols#static_addressing_of_a_gre_tunnel

Re: [WireGuard] Hosting Companies with Dishonest CPUID [Was: Re: Seeking Ubuntu PPA Maintainer]

:D. That is great solution, thank you! On 2016-11-16 16:05, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/commit/?id=34df71964861e7ea5f542bac0225c8b82bb8d9b2 This commit should work around things. ___ WireGuard mailing list

Re: [WireGuard] Seeking Ubuntu PPA Maintainer

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous wrote: > Btw, as for jabber Jason, seems like I need to search for new tor gateway, > thats why I disconnected. Sounds sketchy. Egbert - take the lead, you're the boss, no obligation to work with sketchorama if you find this

Re: [WireGuard] Demo Server: Dual stack?

Hey Dan, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Dan Lüdtke wrote: > Hi Jason, > >> I guess I could provide IPv6 connectivity, but why? It's a demo. > > Because it is a demo of a brand new protocol, showing how it can be used with > legacy versions payload and transport protocol. I

Re: [WireGuard] Demo Server: Dual stack?

Thanks Jason! No hurry, though. Is the script open source as well? Maybe I can tinker with it, so you don't waste your precious development time on supporting infrastructure. > On 16 Nov 2016, at 15:49, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Hey Dan, > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:38

Re: [WireGuard] Seeking Ubuntu PPA Maintainer

You too both maintain Ubuntu PPAs. Could you decide some way of consolidating your efforts? Egbert heeded to the call for help first, so if it comes down to choosing a repository, choosing his would be most fair. But you can work it out amongst yourselves. I could join Egbert. We could create

Re: [WireGuard] Hosting Companies with Dishonest CPUID [Was: Re: Seeking Ubuntu PPA Maintainer]

Hey Jason, The service/hardware is great. But it is a problem with the raid6 module on the host. That uses AVX/AVX2. PCExtreme hasalready blacklisted AVX because all of the virtual machines crashes with it enabled. I'm the only complaining about AVX2 crashing on the machines, so therefore

Re: [WireGuard] Seeking Ubuntu PPA Maintainer

Hey Egbert, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Egbert Verhage wrote: > Hey Jason, > Ofc. Source (wireguard-src in git) is a submodule of the last taged > experimental Oh, awesome. Git submodules for the win! Jason ___ WireGuard

Re: [WireGuard] Demo Server: Dual stack?

Hi Dan, I guess I could provide IPv6 connectivity, but why? It's a demo. If you're using it as an access point to the Internet with intentions beyond simply trying out WireGuard, then you're abusing my service. I'm happy to consider this, but I'll need to be convinced that this actually

[WireGuard] Hosting Companies with Dishonest CPUID [Was: Re: Seeking Ubuntu PPA Maintainer]

Hey Egbert, I'm glad that my avx2disabler module worked for you. I believe it would be in your interest to pressure the hosting provider into either reenabling AVX, or fixing their CPUID to report correct information. CPUID is the kernel's only means of judging capabilities, and if the [virtual]

Re: [WireGuard] Seeking Ubuntu PPA Maintainer

Hello Eugene & Egbert, You too both maintain Ubuntu PPAs. Could you decide some way of consolidating your efforts? Egbert heeded to the call for help first, so if it comes down to choosing a repository, choosing his would be most fair. But you can work it out amongst yourselves. Thanks, Jason

Re: [WireGuard] Seeking Ubuntu PPA Maintainer

Hey Deniel, Thank your for the support. I was search for the git repo of the debian package, thank you for the link. Besides that only difference between ours repo's is that I use a submodule for the wireguard source. Git repo: https://git.launchpad.net/wireguard?h=master Greetz, Egbert On

Re: [WireGuard] Wireguard in OpenWRT/LEDE: FYI: Pull Request

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 05:01:14PM +0100, Dan Lüdtke wrote: >> thanks for the various feedback, guys! Here is the next round: >> >> https://github.com/openwrt/packages/pull/3514 > > This one is now merged,