Hello Jason!
Am 31.03.2021 um 21:11 schrieb Jason A. Donenfeld:
Hi Frank,
Thanks for the patch. Does the line `so4->so_fibnum = so6->so_fibnum =
sc->sc_socket.so_fibnum;` also need to be changed too in initiation,
or is that one fine?
Good catch! I'll check this in the next few days (and
Hi Frank,
Thanks for the patch. Does the line `so4->so_fibnum = so6->so_fibnum =
sc->sc_socket.so_fibnum;` also need to be changed too in initiation,
or is that one fine?
Jason
Hello!
Am 23.03.2021 um 06:51 schrieb Frank Behrens:
Am 22.03.2021 um 19:14 schrieb Jason A. Donenfeld:
Applied to git with some small modifications:
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-freebsd/commit/?id=0a5c6abdfaa1f4f09269a222c1720e2ff3b8aa02
Thanky you! That looks very good.
I'm sorry,
On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 at 13:53, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 23:35, Karol Babioch wrote:
> > What is your recommendation on handling multiple peer-to-peer tunnels?
> > Should I go for multiple interfaces or for one interface with multiple
> > peers?
>
> If you plan to do L3
On Thu, 25 Mar 2021 at 23:35, Karol Babioch wrote:
> What is your recommendation on handling multiple peer-to-peer tunnels?
> Should I go for multiple interfaces or for one interface with multiple
> peers?
If you plan to do L3 routing over the P2P tunnels (e.g.
OSPF/BGP/EIGRP/Babel/etc.). A
