I see from the code that currently the kernel UDP sockets
have checksums enabled. I also note the message from
November speculating upon if in band control messages
should be added.
One thing I was pondering recently in the context of UDP tunnelling,
is that one doesn't really need to have UDP
Hello,
having just learnt of this product, I started poking through
the source; when I got to some of the crypto code I noticed
something curious, and did a bit more research.
I'm curious about the SPDX licence marking on the crypto
source files which seem to be autogenerated, specifically
UDP may (eventually) get a native segmentation capability,
but the work is still under discussion, and possibly subject
to change.
See the FRAG option within draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-udp-options-05)
DF
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 07:23:29AM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > See RFC4821, RFC8085 and
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-tsvwg-datagram-plpmtud-01
> > for more info about PLMTUD.
> >
> >
Various routers have support for running PIM (and IGMP/MLD)
in NBMA mode, whereby individual hosts and joins/leave for
such are tracked, rather than depend upon a shared broadcast
medium.
This is used for mcast over Frame Relay, ATM, etc
which are inherently NBMA.
ISTM that wg should also be
On Sun, Jun 06, 2021 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Peter Linder wrote:
> This would break things for me. We're doing a lot of L2 over L3 site to
> site stuff and we are using wireguard as the outer layer. Inner layer is
> vxlan or l2tpv3.
>
> In particular, people connect lots of stuff with no regard for
