Hi,
I wrote a python tool for scenarios where both WireGuard peers are
behind a NAT.
It supports public key exchange, NAT traversal using STUN, and IP
address exchange. The exchange of this information is done using a DHT.
You can find it here:
https://github.com/manuels/wireguard-p2p
Any
Hi Jason,
Great to hear that wireguard gets a nice IPC interface.
Do you already know when this is about to land in the wireguard
releases/repos?
Bye,
Manuel
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 16:01 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 9:26 PM, Jörg Thalheim
>
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 16:08 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hi Manuel,
>
> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 4:04 PM, Manuel Schölling
> <manuel.schoell...@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Great to hear that wireguard gets a nice IPC interface.
> > Do you already know when this is
I will also not be able to attend in person, but I would definitively
watch a video if you record it!
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 07:36 +0100, Tom Bowditch wrote:
> +1 for having it recorded/live-streamed and put up somewhere. I can’t
> attend, but would be very interested.
>
> Tom
>
> Sent from my
I like the idea of comments!
And while we're at it: having multiple [Peer] section in incompatible
with most other config parsing tools (e.g. python std library's
configparser [1]).
Maybe we could allow the peer section names to be of the form "Peer[A-
Za-z0-9\-]*" or something?
You could also
On Mon, 2017-12-11 at 05:24 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I'd suggest the following for a WireGuard NetworkManager plugin:
>
> 1. If you want to do stuff for wireguard-p2p, can you make it a
> separate "extra" plugin, so that the generic WireGuard one is
> globally
> useful? And then people
---
src/tools/config.c | 15 ++-
src/tools/setconf.c | 17 +++--
src/tools/wg.8 | 6 --
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/tools/config.c b/src/tools/config.c
index 1fddb64..d7bd926 100644
--- a/src/tools/config.c
+++
Hi,
I am currently working on a NetworkManager plugin for WireGuard in Rust
[1/2].
The plugin has to pass the configuration to the wg tool and I am
wondering if this could be done using interprocess communication.
Would it make sense (aka be secure) if we make it possible to call 'wg
setconf wg0
Hi,
On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 06:33 +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> I think he's working on some wilder plugin that incorporates his DHT
> stuff, which is a separate effort from Max's. My personal preference
> is getting a lightweight but functional NetworkManager plugin out
> there for users,