Re: [WireGuard] Demo Server: Dual stack?

Hey Maykel, On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 2:19 PM, Maykel Moya wrote: > With WG it's just setup and forget. Roaming is *reliable*, subjective > performance is impressive (you've done the measures, I just browse and > use services from the v6 internet without hassle). > > IMHO ip6

Re: [WireGuard] Demo Server: Dual stack?

Hey Dan, On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Dan Lüdtke wrote: > Hi Jason, > >> I guess I could provide IPv6 connectivity, but why? It's a demo. > > Because it is a demo of a brand new protocol, showing how it can be used with > legacy versions payload and transport protocol. I

Re: [WireGuard] Demo Server: Dual stack?

Thanks Jason! No hurry, though. Is the script open source as well? Maybe I can tinker with it, so you don't waste your precious development time on supporting infrastructure. > On 16 Nov 2016, at 15:49, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > Hey Dan, > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 3:38

Re: [WireGuard] Demo Server: Dual stack?

Hi Dan, I guess I could provide IPv6 connectivity, but why? It's a demo. If you're using it as an access point to the Internet with intentions beyond simply trying out WireGuard, then you're abusing my service. I'm happy to consider this, but I'll need to be convinced that this actually