On 04.08.2016 13:34, jens wrote:
> [ X ] I have tried removing "sk_clear_memalloc(sock);" and
> "sk_set_memalloc(sock->sk);" from socket.c, and the problem still
> continued.
> [ ] I have tried removing "sock->sk->sk_sndbuf = INT_MAX;" from
&g
tant for
us here
On 03.08.2016 08:48, René van Dorst wrote:
> Hi Jens,
>
> I would like to share my results on a MIPS cpu.
>
> I also tested wireguard on a router. TP-Link WR1043ND v1.08 with a
> Atheros AR9132 400MHz cpu.
> Running LEDE 28-july-2016, wireguard & iperf3 via pack
On 04.08.2016 10:15, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Your prior communications have not been clear to me, and recently
> somebody took the mailing list off the CC. In order to steer this
> conversation back on a useful track, please check all that apply:
>
> [ X ] I have tried removing
On 22.11.2016 17:31, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> But it does add _just a tiny little bit_ of extra complexity, which
> can quickly snowball into something dreadful. My general plan for
> these more enterprise-centric features is to wait until after the
> initial codebase is merged into mainline.
by building i ran in the same error described here ..
[LEDE-DEV] kmod-udptunnel{4, 6} packages are empty (Was: Kernel symbol
dependencies and KCONFIG usage for kernel packages)
yesterday i shortly tested this with tplink 841 and LEDE FW, these
smaller embedded Router System
(as mentioned some emails before)
and we got 30 Mbit Through in on direction and 11-14 the other.
(which doesnt make so much sense to me - but i hadnt time to debug this,
or find out more)
so that
you may want to look into one of these
https://forum.freifunk.net/t/lede-wireguard-gretap-ergebnisse-unter-livebedingungen/14057
https://forum.freifunk.net/t/wireguard-0-0-20161230-linuxkernel-3-18-gluon-v2016-2-2/14122
gretap is possible inside wireguard and so batman-adv on top (for this
On 01.03.2017 14:47, Nicolas Prochazka wrote:
> Hello,
> we hare using wireguard with a lot of client, with a lot of
> dynamically generated peer key.
> So we have, server side, a lot of peers that are become obsoletes
> At this time, we delete peer , based on latest handshake > delta time
> ,
On 03.05.2018 23:53, Andy Dorman wrote:
> I am trying to set up VPN traffic between a local debian server cluster
> (allowed 192.168.99.x/24) and a Linode VM cluster (also debian, allowed
> 192.168.100.x/24).
>
look at the outcome of *ip route* and try to understand where your
traffic for the
i once had written a script for some openWRT (lede) Routers for Freifunk,
first of all, take ipV6 inside your tunnel, and mix localnet V6
Addresses with the MAC - this way you get a very distinct pair of V6
Address and Key
This assumes that a Server has fixed ip and key.
keyline in Setup is this
i really would love to have a feature like wireguard-hosts file.
whereas wg command would print given "name" instead of key - so the
output would be more meaningfull
We have some wireguard running in server like infrastructure, where one
server serves dozens of "clients"
so instead of
peer:
11 matches
Mail list logo
