Hi guys.
Apologies, I'll bother you guys as I failed to find some
better places to ask, I searched for forums etc. but failed.
Can wiregurard ifaces be enslaved by LInux bridge? I tried
but it did not work for me. Similarly "mavclan" -
would/should wireguard work that way?
What I've tried an
On 25/04/2021 13:21, Chriztoffer Hansen wrote:
Can wiregurard ifaces be enslaved by LInux bridge? I tried
but it did not work for me. Similarly "mavclan" -
would/should wireguard work that way?
Why would you want to enslave an L3-only capable interface to an L2 bridge?
What is your use case
Hi guys.
I'm experiencing a pretty weird wireguard, or perhaps
kernel/OS stack bits behavior.
I have three nodes which all can ping each other on wg0's
IPs but when I add a secondary IP:
-> $ ip addr add 10.0.0.226/24 dev wg0
it gets weird, namely, say when that sec IP is on
A -> B ping re
On 08/05/2021 17:50, Roman Mamedov wrote:
On Sat, 8 May 2021 17:31:58 +0100
lejeczek wrote:
I'm experiencing a pretty weird wireguard, or perhaps
kernel/OS stack bits behavior.
I have three nodes which all can ping each other on wg0's
IPs but when I add a secondary IP:
->
On 08/05/2021 17:31, lejeczek wrote:
Hi guys.
I'm experiencing a pretty weird wireguard, or perhaps
kernel/OS stack bits behavior.
I have three nodes which all can ping each other on wg0's
IPs but when I add a secondary IP:
-> $ ip addr add 10.0.0.226/24 dev wg0
it gets
Hi guys.
I'm still new to wireguard and still not an expert on network stack so I
struggle with something what might be trivial.
A roadwarrior when connected to the server sees a forward-port on
server's internal network as 'closed':
10.3.9.10 -> 10.3.9.1 10.3.1.1 (port forward) => 10.8.9.
Hi guys
I thought there was no better place to ask but here so -
both ends are centOS and end up having different MTUs for
'wg' interfaces and that I thought, was wrong.
1370 (server) VS 1320 (client)
I expected that would be negotiated between nodes without
user involved, right?
Moreover if
Hi guys
what is below error the symptom of?
-> $ wg-quick up wg-r2
[#] ip link add wg-r2 type wireguard
[#] wg setconf wg-r2 /dev/fd/63
[#] ip -4 address add 10.3.3.254/24 dev wg-r2
[#] ip link set mtu 1320 up dev wg-r2
RTNETLINK answers: Address already in use
[#] ip link delete dev wg-r2
I'll
On 13/04/2022 20:45, Shulhan wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2022 18:45:24 +0100
lejeczek wrote:
Hi guys
what is below error the symptom of?
-> $ wg-quick up wg-r2
[#] ip link add wg-r2 type wireguard
[#] wg setconf wg-r2 /dev/fd/63
[#] ip -4 address add 10.3.3.254/24 dev wg-r2
[#] ip link set
Hi guys.
I have quite a peculiar case which possibly might interest
anybody - as oppose to just resolving an issue.
I use a very popular monitoring tool 'monit' to monit my wg0
iface and that works okey, meaning 'monit' does not see any
issue with wg0, but _only_ if 'qbittorrent' is _not_ runn
Hi guys.
In case somebody here looks after
'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:jdoss:wireguard' then
wireguard-dkms-1.0.20220627-1.el8.noarch for 4.18.0-394.el8.x86_64 fails
to build
many thanks, L.
On 29/06/2022 13:27, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 2:17 PM lejeczek wrote:
Hi guys.
In case somebody here looks after
'copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:jdoss:wireguard' then
wireguard-dkms-1.0.20220627-1.el8.noarch for 4.18.0-394.el8.x86_64 fails
to build
many
Hi guys.
Purely accidentally I stumbled uppon:
-> $ ping 10.1.101
PING 10.1.101 (10.1.0.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.415 ms
-> $ ip a ls dev wg0
17: wg0: mtu 8920 qdisc
noqueue state U
Marek Küthe
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 11:30:26 +0200
lejeczek wrote:
Hi guys.
Purely accidentally I stumbled uppon:
-> $ ping 10.1.101
PING 10.1.101 (10.1.0.101) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.148 ms
64 bytes from 10.1.0.101: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.415
On 08/06/2023 14:04, Marek Küthe wrote:
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 13:45:27 +0200
lejeczek wrote:
On 08/06/2023 11:47, Marek Küthe wrote:
Hello,
I would be interested to know how you managed to post something on the
Mailling list? I have been trying to do this for several weeks, however
my
ignore
16 matches
Mail list logo