On Wed 2017-08-09 13:16:45 +0200, Egbert Verhage wrote:
> Ow, that it is a common problem.
> I think your patch is a nice updated.
>
> So I got some time left and build a patch (pull request) on github
> here: https://github.com/EggieCode/wireguard-ppa/pull/24
thanks for writing this
Hey Jason,
Ow, that it is a common problem.
I think your patch is a nice updated.
So I got some time left and build a patch (pull request) on github
here: https://github.com/EggieCode/wireguard-ppa/pull/24
Let me known what you think.
Greetz,
Egbert
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 01:16 +0200, Jason A.
On Wed, 9 Aug 2017 01:30:50 +0200
"Jason A. Donenfeld" wrote:
> That might mean printing nice messages if the correct dependency isn't
> obvious.
>
> For (1) and (2), though, what do you think of the warning I've added
> to Gentoo? That's what I meant by asking for thoughts on
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Jonathon Fernyhough
wrote:
> On 09/08/17 00:16, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> 3) not having any headers installed
>>
> ...
>>
>> Any thoughts on this pattern?
>>
>
> I suspect this would be a packaging issue - packages that build
On 09/08/17 00:16, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> 3) not having any headers installed
>
...
>
> Any thoughts on this pattern?
>
I suspect this would be a packaging issue - packages that build modules
should depend on whatever headers (etc.) that are necessary for building
the module. I can't