Title: Message
I just ran across the same thing in NJ near a power
plant.
I'm installing customers, but the noise floor's -71 - so
that means they need a 59 signal or better. ouch.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JohnnyOSent:
Sunday, October 23, 2005 11:55
Title: Message
Ask
Rick Smith ! - we cannot install here unless we have a -52 or better ! DOH
! This gives us a 1/2 mile operating radius with 900mhz !
:)
JohnnyO
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Travis JohnsonSent: Sunday
Hopefully you aren't really installing customers that have a -55 to -60
noise floor. How reliable of a signal can they really have?
Travis
Microserv
JohnnyO wrote:
Hate to say it Dan, BUT - Trango and Atheros get's it's ass kicked by
Canopy - Canopy is the ONLY 900mhz Platform that will wo
ping
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Hate to say it Dan, BUT - Trango and Atheros get's it's ass kicked by
Canopy - Canopy is the ONLY 900mhz Platform that will work for us in a
-55 to -60 noise floor situation - so hopefully - you live In the
perfect world and can run "noise/interference" free :)
JohnnyO
-Original Message-
What I have experienced is that 30% or better is usually a solid signal
quality. 15% or better is usually a solid signal strength. I have never
figured out a "%" to "dbm" translation.
The web-only non-snmp interface is my least favorite thing about 2611
CB3 Deluxes.
My most favorite thing abou
This is awesome, I knew this was coming, ideally once it works with MT with
adjustable channel width (ie: 5mhz or 10mhz) - you should be able to push some
serious throughput on that 5mhz channel compared to the existing Trango & Canopy
900mhz systems
Hopefully the pricing on the radio is the same
Rick Smith wrote:
Wind sheer in the upper atmosphere over the gulf.
That's why it's stalled...soon as it leaves the shoreline of mexico, it's gonna get hacked down to a cat 1 by those easterly winds.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Geo
They said it wouldn't be done!
Also: Why only 4/2/1 non-overlapping channels? Why not 3?
Best,-- Dylan OliverPrimaverity, LLC
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
CLECs see gold in wireless -
The wireless field is quickly growing as a potentially lucrative source for
CLECs. Many carriers not only are generating revenues from providing
backhaul service to wireless companies, but the CLEC industry also hopes to
get into wireless broadband. -
http://telephonyo
?? I knew Atheros had a 1900MHz chipset but didn't think they had a 900MHz
product. Do you know where the details are for this chipset?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rick Smith
Sent: 22 October 2005 22:25
To: WISPA General List
Subject: R
11 matches
Mail list logo