Has anyone heard of BTS Tower Development? They're looking to build a tower in
a town near me and I'm wondering if they're just going to sell it to someone
else and how friendly they are to WISPs.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
We already run some VPNs across our network but I am under the
impression that VLans may be a little more efficient way of transporting
data where the points all reside within our network. Is this true?
__
Patrick Nix, Jr.,
csweb.net
(918) 235-0414
Mpls vlan yes.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: Patrick Nix Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:05:07
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] VLan or VPN to multiple points
We already run some VPNs across our network but I
Well, I gave them a ring. They are net doing Tranzeo.
Any others out there?
Jim Patient wrote:
1-866-439-5469
http://cgi3.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewUserPageuserid=ezlinxnet
Jim
Blair Davis wrote:
The ez one I had heard of, but, if either is on here, hopefully, he will
Tobin at American Communications can probably repair Tranzeo radios. but you
have to pay per radio (Which is probably going to be $200 or so).
With the cost of a Tranzeo CPE it is probably going to be cheaper just to
replace them then to try and have them fixed.
Ezlinx is the only company
thanks. at $200, i'll replace the little ones with NS2's
The big ones, I'll have to think about...
3-dB Networks wrote:
Tobin at American Communications can probably repair Tranzeo radios. but you
have to pay per radio (Which is probably going to be $200 or so).
With the cost of a
I have several PtP shots that I'd like to do with 802.11a 5.8 GHz Wi-Fi,
but I would like to make sure that I have the necessary fade margins.
For the longer links in which I want to be safe, I was thinking about
putting two 802.11a PtP links and then connecting the two radios on each
side to
Ok.
When someone designs an end to end transport network they are committing to
being a layer3 or a layer2 network by design.
Sure you can have bridged components on a routed network, and you can have
routed end devices on a bridged network, and you can do it differently on
your WAN, MAN,
Tom,
We are beta testing mikrotik MPLS in our network. So far , not bad at
all ...
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
I'd love to hear more on how it goes, as it goes.
We came really close to giving MT's MPLS a try last Spring as well, but got
cold feet at the last minute, and went a different route.
Not because of the MPLS code, but because of other MT issues.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet-
I've hear some are repairing themselves by putting in their alternative
boards? I'd like to hear what works best.
-RickG
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Blair Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I gave them a ring. They are net doing Tranzeo.
Any others out there?
Jim Patient wrote:
Most of them are just CM9 cards or ubnt cards. Alternate boards work
in them, you just have to re-seal the antenna enclosure.
ryan
On Aug 18, 2008, at 8:00 PM, RickG wrote:
I've hear some are repairing themselves by putting in their
alternative
boards? I'd like to hear what works best.
RB133 and radio of your choice, costs around $100 and you get more features
than Tranzeo and I think better throughput. Only problem with the newer Slim
Line series the Rj-45 pigtail is gone since they mount their SBC right up to
the hole under the boot so adding an aftermarket board is a problem
13 matches
Mail list logo
