I haven't deployed any Rocket PtP links with less than 55 signal.
Have you followed UBNT's best practices guide?
http://www.ubnt.com/downloads/Best%20Practices.pdf
Next step, hit up their forum or their support. Matt at UBNT worked some
magic on one of my links and it has been solid ever
Have you tried to not use auto for ack and set the ack for 1.5
times the distance ?
-- Original Message --
From: Mike Hammett wispawirel...@ics-il.net
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 05:38:39 -0500
I haven't
This sounds like an odd thing to try but have you tried switching which end is
the AP and the STA. I Have not found UBNT PTP links to be anywhere close to
symmetrical and have had 2 different times that switching the AP end to improve
signal and troughput.
Also with some help of Justin Wilson
I thought I would post back on here what we did and our results.
These are preliminary.
Equipment:
1 x 320AP
Configuration with only one sector:
Power set to 19.9dB (per the manual for legal power settings)
AP set to -65 power leveling
Client signals at the AP were -65 (or thereabouts, this
You've given me a lot to consider.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2011, at 9:01 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
Can't rely on the noise level reading indicated on a live link's status
screen. (although we tend to put a lot of weight on the noise shown using
the Spectrum
Thanks for posting your results Chuck. I've been looking into this idea for
a while, but never pulled the trigger.
I presume you used the Moto stock sectors?
-Eric
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:39 AM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
I thought I would post back on here what we did and our
Yes.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Eric Muehleisen ericm...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for posting your results Chuck. I've been looking into this idea for
a while, but never pulled the trigger.
I presume you used the Moto stock sectors?
-Eric
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at
Do you have a reference for calculating the proper cable lengths and
antenna spacing based on frequency when using splitters in a
configuration like this?
Thanks,
-Kristian
On 10/25/2011 06:39 AM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
I thought I would post back on here what we did and our results.
These are
It is my understanding that they need to be of the same length. That
was our design, all the same length...we used 18 LMR 240 for this
situation.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Kristian Hoffmann kh...@fire2wire.com wrote:
Do you have a reference for calculating the proper
Premades? Or did you make your own and get as close as humanly possible?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
It is my understanding that they need to be of the
You are not really talking a phased array here. Lengths should not be
critical.
- Reply message -
From: Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Splitters with Motorola Canopy 320 - Results Update
Date: Tue, Oct 25, 2011 2:39
No they were pre-made/tested by Titan Wireless.
Regards,
Chuck
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
Premades? Or did you make your own and get as close as humanly possible?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
+1
TOPIC CHANGE:
I have received several requests from customers who are looking for some
sort of WiFi signal booster that attached to their laptop's USB and enhances
reception through their internal WiFi radio (sort of an external antenna for
their internal built in WiFi radio, if you will).
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 14:14, Aaron D. Osgood
aosg...@streamline-solutions.net wrote:
I have received several requests from customers who are looking for some
sort of WiFi signal booster that attached to their laptop's USB and
enhances
reception through their internal WiFi radio (sort of an
http://ubnt.com/wifistation
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:21 PM, David E. Smith d...@mvn.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 14:14, Aaron D. Osgood
aosg...@streamline-solutions.net wrote:
I have
Interesting, care to post the test results?
I'm interested to see what the actual attenuation is on these cables at 5.7GHz.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Chuck Hogg
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2011 2:06 PM
To: WISPA
I have often wondered if it would be better to have two antennas in one given
direction, with one being \ pol and the other antenna being used for / pol. I
wondered if special diversity would allow us to achieve better penetration
results to clients without using splitters.
Basically order
Eric: The whole purpose of this test was to create an omni effect.
You're talking about something totally different, and I have often
wondered that as well. I think there was a company that did this a
long time ago, Luxul maybe? You would buy their antenna array..and
they claimed a lot but
We are looking to trench some fiber to a new tower a few hundred foot
away. Was wandering how cost effective to cut and terminate our own
fiber for this would be? Its close enough for cat-6 to reach but was
thinking just dropping fiber instead to avoid needing arrestors. What
fiber does
We currently use AMP Lightcrimp Plus, but are looking at using Belden
FiberExpress Brilliance in the future.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQtiUTY-6zs
http://www.graybar.com/documents/belden-fiberexpress-installation-guide.pdf
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Matt lm7...@gmail.com wrote:
We are
Hi there,
Just got off the phone with my FCC attorney and the Net Neutrality rules are
back on and we are to comply by Nov. 20th. Has anyone done anything
regarding this, we are working on it but would like to know what others are
doing. Let me know.
Thanks
Tony Iacopi
831-902-0700
If you are a Title II regulated telco, they might apply to you.
As an operator of a privately funded broadband network, Net Neutrality
does not apply to you. You paid for it, you can do what you want with it.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 10/25/2011 4:46 PM, Tony Iacopi wrote:
Hi there,
At 10/25/2011 07:43 PM, Matt Larsen wrote:
If you are a Title II regulated telco, they might apply to you.
As an operator of a privately funded broadband network, Net
Neutrality does not apply to you. You paid for it, you can do what
you want with it.
Legally, per the letter of the
Let me give you an example of Firmware voodoo...
Noise detected for link was like nothing on numerous channels... Started
with Firm 5.4.1 link acting weird. So downgraded to 5.3.3.
Rocket GPS on one side, Rocket on other. Couldn't downgrade lower, because
Rocket-GPS wont allow it.
Embedded
24 matches
Mail list logo
