We ordered one as soon as they were available. We haven't put into use yet
though. We currently have an Asterisk (PbxInaFlash version) server in place
and we would have lost a fair amount of capabilities if we had switched
already. Every update that comes out adds in some of the stuff that
http://www.feld.com/wp/archives/2014/05/dear-internet-lets-demo-slow-lan
e.html
They were trying to explain what the slow lane could look like in the
future for the web... but LIKE that a WISP was faster than all his home
options, except Comcast 75M and Google Fiber at 800M...
Good job,
Our consulting firm put one in at a lawyer’s office, to replace an OLD Nortel
system. They wanted the simple ability to have an inbound call ring all
phones, but if it times out after 3 rings, goto an IVR. We have been doing
this for a long time with FreePBX, but it is limited with GS.
Why do you want to put a 'box' on-site ?
Why not hosted PBX, and have IP Phones ?
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
- Original Message
It seems like a box on site would make routing/nat issues easier to manage
especially for customers who may not have our Internet or want to keep a
second internet provider for redundancy. It seems like a bunch of ip
phones behind nat connecting up to our switch or a hosted solution would be
Heith et al.,
There are a couple of economic questions that you need to answer first:
1. *Is there a customer device expense to your business? i.e. did you
send / install a device for the client that allows them to use your service
that the client doesn't pay for or pays monthly?*
How can I redirect slow pay clients to a Pay your bill web site.
Is there a inexpensive way to do this?
What do you suggest?
Thanx
NGL
If you can read this Thank A Teacher.
And if it's in English Thank A Soldier!
___
Wireless mailing list
Most of the billing systems will do this (ours will!), but barring that,
you could use the web proxy with some firewall rules to do it in a MT
router.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:23 PM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net wrote:
How can I redirect slow pay clients to a Pay your bill web site.
Is there a
The term for this is 'Captive Portal'. You regularly see this where
internet access is paid for on-demand for a period of time (airport, hotel,
airplane, etc.). Most commercial ISP billing systems have this
functionality built in today. It is either done by intercepting HTTP or
DNS requests.
I've never been a fan of anything grandstream has ever made so I wouldn't
go there. JMO
Get some other solution for the PBX (running your own software on a nice
little atom works great / some flavor of asterisk) and do yourself a favor
and pick up some yealink phones. The name kept me
I have one of these coming in to try out, they're dirt cheap and are supposed
to be decent. They support up to 8 calls and are supposed to run on asterisk.
http://www.atcom.cn/IP02.html
Bryce D
NETAGO
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Scott
testing
--
West Michigan Wireless ISP
Allegan, Michigan 49010
269-686-8648
A Division of:
Camp Communication Services, INC
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
No proxy required, just some NAT rules
On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
Most of the billing systems will do this (ours will!), but barring
that, you could use the web proxy with some firewall rules to do it in
a MT router.
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:23 PM, ~NGL~ n...@ngl.net
Where do I put these rules, in the router?
NGL
From: Scott Reed
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Redirect clients
No proxy required, just some NAT rules
On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
Most of the billing systems
We find it easier to manage nat/routing issues via a hosted pbx.
(Pbx is hosted on a Virtual Server VPS at the DataCenter)
Using Mikrotik's as client routers (managed router service) is very practical.
Setting up Dual ISP with Failover is a bit daunting task, however if you
follow this,
Working around NAT issues with SIP and RTP has little-to-nothing to do with
whether the PBX lives in the cloud or is a local piece of hardware. We do
not (at this time) do hosted PBX ourselves, and NAT is generally not a problem.
Our strategy isn't even to use something like STUN or TURN. It
Nat rules work as long as you have an ip. If it is a url you will need Web
proxyunless this has changed recently.
On May 14, 2014 7:56 PM, Scott Reed sr...@nwwnet.net wrote:
No proxy required, just some NAT rules
On 5/14/2014 4:28 PM, Cameron Crum wrote:
Most of the billing systems will
Agreed, that SIP/RTP NAT issues are non-issue when you are using a consistent
Router such as Mikrotik.
B2BUA (Back to Back user agent, e.g. asterisk to asterisk) has its advantage
and also it's own set of issues (typically in Codec Conversion ...
STUN or TURN are not necessary either, all
Lots to address here. :) Thanks for engaging.
By B2BUA, I don't mean Asterisk to Asterisk. I mean something like Asterisk
itself...Asterisk is, by its very nature, a self-contained back-to-back user
agent. That is, it doesn't just forward SIP messages from a proxy or UA
upstream. It
After re-reading what I wrote, I guess I should clarify the following:
We have a homegrown SIP-based telephony service that is built on top of
Asterisk, but which is emphatically not hosted PBX. We can provision an
account as either a single line (one DID, one SIP registration from an ATA, 2
20 matches
Mail list logo
