On 6/8/17 16:35, Mitch wrote:
> I here protect existing...What about new PtP priority over PtMP??
New 6GHz licensed links must be continued to be allowed in my opinion,
even if it requires shutdown for someone's multipoint.
~Seth
___
Wireless mailing
I here protect existing...What about new PtP priority over PtMP??
On 6/7/2017 4:34 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
> For 6Ghz it would likely be a coordinated system similar to the SAS system
> planned for CBRS but without the ESC portion. The coordination from the SAS
> would protect existing
Anyone who can service a business at 8002 Westway Dr, Harlingen, TX, please
contact me.
--
Jeremy Austin
(907) 895-2311 office
(907) 803-5422 cell
jhaus...@gmail.com
Heritage NetWorks
Whitestone Power & Communications
Vertical Broadband, LLC
___
I've got a site where we force a Poe port on to port a 110. It works for
days or weeks and then the board thinks there's a short (auto power thinks
the same).
Is there a way to disable this safety function?
Has anyone else tried this? Thinking it may be time to replace it to a 200
and correct
Context context context ...
do you know who much Freq is in 4.9 you are talking about ? :)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
- Original Message -
>
