Re: [WISPA] 3650Mhz and Wimax Vendors

2009-04-23 Thread Ben Wiechman
I'd love to contribute more, however our experience really lies in 2.5GHz, which has a completely different power output profile than you get in the unlicensed bands, or 3650 so you're going to see a corresponding decrease in cell size and modulation levels as the power output decreases and noise f

Re: [WISPA] 3650Mhz and Wimax Vendors

2009-04-23 Thread Ben Wiechman
l Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Charles Wyble > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 3:40 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3650Mhz and Wimax Vendors > > This is what I'm looking for. Thank yo

Re: [WISPA] Wimax 802.16d v 802.16e

2009-04-22 Thread Ben Wiechman
16e output power depends on frequency band in use. For 3650 the same limitations that were mentioned would apply: 1W per MHz. If unlicensed bands were added to the profiles output power would be limited as it currently is, typically to 4W EIRP. In 2.5GHz the limitation is related to received signal

Re: [WISPA] 3650Mhz and Wimax Vendors

2009-04-22 Thread Ben Wiechman
are not there, nor do you need additional network components like an ASN-GW, and typically provisioning is greatly simplified. The problem you run into on the 16e side is that every vendor is only thinking about Clearwire and not considering the WISP and the price point a WISP is able to justify.

Re: [WISPA] Bad Geocoding Data

2009-04-07 Thread Ben Wiechman
We've had pretty good results from this site as well: http://www.batchgeocode.com/ Typically only a few that aren't located correctly. Obviously your area may vary. Ben > -Original Message- > From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On > Behalf Of Matt Larse