I could certainly see how Trango could be superior to other multi-modulation 
systems.  Others would up and down speed, affecting overall performance while 
Trango is going to be either working or dropping packets (which only affects 
one customer, with ARQ off).

I am close to picking Trango but since Trango is discontinuing 5.3 due to DFS 
requirements, now I'm starting to wonder if 5.7-5.8 is enough.

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Tom DeReggi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
Date:  Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:16:55 -0400

>>But can systems like Mikrotik for
>>QOS adequately pack the packets over the wireless
>
>Good Question, that I do not have the answer to.
> I had thought that there was some trade off in latency doing the packet
>combining on slow processor boards.
>One of the big reasons, I have been an advocate for higher processor
>400-533Mhz boards.
>
>The Trangos have a higher PPS count than you might think. (I no longer have
>the data on what that amount actually is)
>The DSSS/TDD radios are also more consistent in their delivery of
>throughput, which make them more predictable then a radio that may be fast
>90% of the time but frequently drop down to low speeds, and drop VOIP
>packets during the process.
>
>>But in the same sense, its not as cut and dry as oversubscription.
>
>Agreed, but on the other hand, its not as cut and dry as having high PPS
>count either.
>
>Tom DeReggi
>RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Doug Ratcliffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 10:39 AM
>Subject: RE: [WISPA] Trango & VOIP
>
>
>But in the same sense, its not as cut and dry as oversubscription.  If it
>were, then a 5Mbps/5Mbps ratio could give me 103 calls/Mbit (IAX2/G729) but
>in reality, that's 100k PPS per 100 calls, making it unworkable.  But at the
>same token, if I decide 15 concurrent calls @ G711 per AP is a usable number
>with bandwidth left over, I can manage oversubscription there.
>
>Ultimately, it's the PPS that kills it.  But can systems like Mikrotik for
>QOS adequately pack the packets over the wireless so that instead of
>transmitting 100 300byte packets, to transmit 20 1500byte packets?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2007 10:06 AM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango & VOIP
>
>I have plenty of VOIP customers behind my Trango network.
>I'm also getting excellent results using Targeted Technologies proprietary
>8K stream VOIP even over my 900Mhz Trango.
>Trango has plenty of processing power and pps performance to do VOIP.
>
>The relevent question is, is the oversubscription rate you plan to use on
>your network within the capabilty of delivering VOIP?
>There are many challenges in delivering quality VOIP over ANY PtMP network
>design.
>
>Although prioirtization helps, its not the one save all feature. In PtMP end
>
>users must compete for upload time of the AP, even smart polling systems do
>not 100% solve this issue in an oversubscribed network, although helps
>significantly. Backend prioiritization is not enough for upload direction,
>if it gets choked at the AP before it reaches the prioritization.  If you
>are going to do VOIP, you must be more conservative on your oversubscription
>
>rate, and you will be fine.  On the download side it is not a problem as
>traffic will reach the bandwdith management/prioiritization before it
>reaches the AP.
>
>With that said, Trango had been working on a VOIP prioritized firmware last
>year for the 5580, I do not know if it was released or not.
>The second issue is whether you are designing your Trango network with
>enough RF margin.  Never never use a bare 5580 radio, its pointless.  The
>Behive antennas are now shipping for the Trango 5580 also!! They work great,
>
>and bring the signal up to between 15-18 db antenna gain, depending on the
>case.  They are great.
>
>Lastly, the newest Trango Firmwares added some support to help with out of
>order packets with its ARQ algorithym.  This seemed to help quite a bit to
>optimize the VOIP performance when using ARQ.  We only run Trango with ARQ.
>To valuable to turn off.  (With the exception of for 5830s).
>
>The other decission you'll need to make is whetehr the over all design of
>your network is good enough to be a VOIP provider. You will have to be the
>judge of that.  Voice services are demanding, from an uptime SLA point of
>view.  To handle this, we are adding more point to point links, more
>licensed links, getting rid of backbone bottle necks, etc.
>
>But Trango can handle VOIP just fine, as far as capabilty of a radio.  The
>VOIP engineering is up to you, on the router behind and in front of them.
>
>Tom DeReggi
>RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
>IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Doug Ratcliffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
>Sent: Monday, July 02, 2007 2:23 PM
>Subject: [WISPA] Trango & VOIP
>
>
>Just a quick question to the list, is Trango 5800 series still a viable
>option for providing data & VOIP (IAX2) to customers?  I know a few ISPs out
>there who use it for that, but there's virtually no data at all on the
>Trango site regarding it.  I tried Canopy Adv. a few months back but was
>unhappy with the overall range & quality (2.5 miles LOS w/ a reflector, and
>8 port ATA, the voice was choppy when I had all 8 calls going).  I'm
>transmitting 1-3 miles over a salt water ¾ mile wide river.
>
>
>
>I am just looking for some real world experiences out there.
>
>
>
>Thanks
>
>--
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>--
>Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.6/865 - Release Date: 6/24/2007
>8:33 AM
>
>
>--
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
>--
>Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.8.14/845 - Release Date: 6/12/2007
>6:39 AM
>
>
>--
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>--
>Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.5.472 / Virus Database: 269.9.6/865 - Release Date: 6/24/2007
>8:33 AM
>
>
>--
>WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to