This is due to the fact that they dont have the contention protocol.
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:56:49 -0500, Mike Cowan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Not sure why but the FCC dinged Redline 10DB of tx power due average
vs peak power calculations.
Mike
At 12:26 PM 1/12/2008, you wrote:
IIRC,
wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 10:07 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 3.65 needs more lobbying (was Re: One Ring Networks To
Rollout New WiMAX Service)
This is due to the fact that they dont have the contention protocol.
On Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:56:49 -0500, Mike Cowan
[EMAIL
As much as I like seeing One Ring's name over and over I figured I
switch the subject line to match the tread.
Mike's comments below are accurate with regard to Redline's equipment.
However, it should be noted that Redline was not able to get their gear
certified at the full power output
, January 12, 2008 1:12 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] 3.65 needs more lobbying (was Re: One Ring Networks To
Rollout New WiMAX Service)
As much as I like seeing One Ring's name over and over I figured I
switch the subject line to match the tread.
Mike's comments below are accurate
Not sure why but the FCC dinged Redline 10DB of tx power due average
vs peak power calculations.
Mike
At 12:26 PM 1/12/2008, you wrote:
IIRC,
3.65 ghz rules allow 1 watt EIRP per each mhz of bandwidth, thus a 7.5
Mhz Radio would be allowed 7.5 Watts of EIRP, 10 Mhz radio would be 10
Watts
