What's the gain on the 6 footer and where did you find it?
On 7/19/09, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Yes
>
> Josh Luthman wrote:
>>
>> Is that 6ft on one side and 2ft on the other side?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>
Yes
Josh Luthman wrote:
Is that 6ft on one side and 2ft on the other side?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Co
Is that 6ft on one side and 2ft on the other side?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
"When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however
improbable, must be the truth."
--- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009
6ft and 2ft
RickG wrote:
Travis, what type of antennas do you have on this link? -RickG
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
I have a 73 mile link using Mikrotik with SR5 cards using a 20mhz channel. I
can get 26Mbps (compared with 30Mbps on a 10 mile link).
A
Travis, what type of antennas do you have on this link? -RickG
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 10:06 PM, Travis Johnson wrote:
> I have a 73 mile link using Mikrotik with SR5 cards using a 20mhz channel. I
> can get 26Mbps (compared with 30Mbps on a 10 mile link).
>
> A single 20mhz channel is much easier
I have a 73 mile link using Mikrotik with SR5 cards using a 20mhz
channel. I can get 26Mbps (compared with 30Mbps on a 10 mile link).
A single 20mhz channel is much easier to setup, troubleshoot, etc.
Travis
Microserv
Rubens Kuhl wrote:
Which makes an interesting dilemma: 1 20 MHz channel
Which makes an interesting dilemma: 1 20 MHz channel versus 2 10 MHz
channels, TDD x FDD.
My guess: TDD wil work better for short distances due to ACK timing,
FDD for larger distance will perform better, but this is strongly
traffic pattern dependent.
Rubens
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Tr
Hi All!
I've been lurking a while on the list, and knew some of you at last
chat session.
My solution of choice for this is using OSPF with unqueal costs,
inverted on RX and TX:
cost 1 - cost 2
cost 2 - cost 1
This will achieve a high real word throughput because TCP traffic
generates the same
There is only room for a single 20mhz channel using 3.65ghz. About
30Mbps is the max you are going to get.
Travis
Microserv
my_em...@webjogger.net wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has setup a Mikrotik Dual Nstreme link using
> the Ubiquiti XR3 (3.65GHz) cards?
>
> I have a PTP link setup curr
You don't have enough spectrum to do that.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: "my_em...@webjogger.net"
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:08:16
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Dual Nstreme using XR3
I was wondering if anyone has setup
What kind of channels size are you goiNg to use?
Sent from my Motorola Startac...
On Jul 17, 2009, at 6:15 PM, "Josh Luthman"
wrote:
> Tom at Roc Noc has a backhaul with one.
>
> Don't use dual nstreme - use ospf to bridge the two.
>
> On 7/17/09, my_em...@webjogger.net wrote:
>> I was wond
Tom at Roc Noc has a backhaul with one.
Don't use dual nstreme - use ospf to bridge the two.
On 7/17/09, my_em...@webjogger.net wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone has setup a Mikrotik Dual Nstreme link using
> the Ubiquiti XR3 (3.65GHz) cards?
>
> I have a PTP link setup currently with these XR3
I was wondering if anyone has setup a Mikrotik Dual Nstreme link using
the Ubiquiti XR3 (3.65GHz) cards?
I have a PTP link setup currently with these XR3 cards and I'm getting
about 21Mbps in each direction with TCP and about 29Mbps with UDP. I was
wondering kind of increased performance will I
13 matches
Mail list logo
