Short addition…
Steve Coran has this (theoretically pending) NPRM on his watch list.
I asked Ari and the Legislative group to see what is happening in Congress with
CCA’s efforts. If they are making any traction WISPA can pile on if the CCA’s
plan works for us.
Mark
Mark Radabaugh
WISPA
017 12:05 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question
Can someone comment on whether this new ruling is going to pass or not:
New FAA Marking Requirements May Impact Rural Towers Under 200 Feet
A recently passed law, the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act o
<dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com>
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2017 11:05:07 PM
Subject: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question
Can someone comment on whether this new ruling is going to pass or not:
New FAA Marking Requirements May Impact Rural Towers Under 200 F
This was something Congress enacted last year and it required the FAA to issue
the rule by 7/15/2017. The FAA has not yet issued the NPRM or, as best WISPA
can tell, done anything in regard to the issue. The FAA appears to be
ignoring it.
I asked what happens when a Federal Agency ignores
GEEZE... can a guy get a break?
Joe Lenig
VABB
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of David Williamson
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2017 12:05 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] FCC tower lighting question
Can someone comment on whether
Can someone comment on whether this new ruling is going to pass or not:
New FAA Marking Requirements May Impact Rural Towers Under 200 Feet
A recently passed law, the FAA Extension, Safety, and Security Act of
2016 (Act), will affect certain towers that are between fifty (50) and
two
