General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Based at least partly on what I've learned on this list:
An enclosure can contain radios from 2 different bands with no issues.
A dual band sector has less wind loading than one of each.
Radios and enclosures have gotten cheaper
Just a little mad. Antennas and cable do fail. That's something you need to
consider in
your fault tolerance. We've seen stuff fail from pac wireless, gabriel,
superpass, etc..
The whole price range. We've also seen MTI ones fail when struck by lightning.
As far as sectors go, there is often
' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Yes I see that, good point, the dl will do 40Vdc but 24 is max
recommended.
It also drops out at 8.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun
...@aweiowa.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:04 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
I have been thinking of putting together a fully fault tolerant tower
setup.
1 antenna; two radios. Separate CAT5, separate box. If one radio
failed
: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Based at least partly on what I've learned on this list:
An enclosure can contain radios from 2 different bands with no issues.
A dual band sector has less wind loading than one of each.
Radios and enclosures have gotten cheaper.
It really wouldn't be any
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 8:09 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Chuck,
Have you written any scripts to automate those din relays based on
input from another application? Like
I have been thinking of putting together a fully fault tolerant tower setup.
1 antenna; two radios. Separate CAT5, separate box. If one radio
failed, the other would come on-line. The replacement climb would be
taken out of the EMERGENCY category.
A complete system would be a 3) 5.8 120
of both including redundancy where it counts would be
best IMO
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
From: Mike m...@aweiowa.com
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:05 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Fault tolerant
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
I have been thinking of putting together a fully fault tolerant tower
setup.
1 antenna; two radios. Separate CAT5, separate box. If one radio
failed, the other would come on-line. The replacement climb would
Message -
From: Mike m...@aweiowa.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:04 PM
Subject: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
I have been thinking of putting together a fully fault tolerant tower
setup.
1 antenna; two radios. Separate CAT5
: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Based at least partly on what I've learned on this list:
An enclosure can contain radios from 2 different bands with no issues.
A dual band sector has less wind loading than one of each.
Radios and enclosures have gotten cheaper.
It really wouldn't be any
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Based at least partly on what I've learned on this list:
An enclosure can contain radios from 2 different bands with no issues.
A dual band sector has less wind loading than one of each.
Radios and enclosures have gotten cheaper
...@aweiowa.com
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 9:05 PM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
I have been thinking of putting together a fully fault tolerant tower
setup.
1 antenna; two radios. Separate CAT5, separate box. If one radio
failed
Their $135 against $119.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Some remote control
Oops, my bad DL's is $150 each 10 + 119
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Some
]
On
Behalf Of os10ru...@gmail.com
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 8:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Some remote control devices I've been looking at for remote
controlling our generator:
http://www.controlbyweb.com/webrelay-quad/ (this one
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fault tolerant tower deployment
Yeah but it goes to 28vdc vs 24vdc. Those 4 extra volts might make a
difference for folks doing 24 volt solar.
On Oct 29, 2009, at 11:44 PM, Chuck Profito wrote:
Their $135 against $119.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun
17 matches
Mail list logo
