[WISPA] IPV6 address allocation

2012-12-10 Thread Arthur Stephens
Thinking of splitting our /32 up into large enough subnets to cover existing and future equipment on our network. Seems that assigning /112 IPV6 to currently assigned /24 IPV4 networks would be more than enough addresses. Any thoughts? Ideas? -- Arthur Stephens Senior Sales Technician Ptera

Re: [WISPA] IPV6 address allocation

2012-12-10 Thread Mike Hammett
-contiguous blocks allocated, but each block can grow. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Arthur Stephens arthur.steph...@ptera.net To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 2:07:05 PM Subject: [WISPA] IPV6 address

Re: [WISPA] IPV6 address allocation

2012-12-10 Thread Tim Densmore
Networks longer than /64 break SLAAC which may be desirable or undesirable, depending on what you're doing. The info at this site is what I frequently see/hear currently - http://www.ipbcop.org/ratified-bcops/bcop-ipv6-subnetting/ In general: Subnet at the nibble boundary Do everything you