On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 04:04:38PM -0400, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 9/23/2010 03:43 PM, you wrote:
Hmm... looks like we need to keep up the good fight:
I know this is out of line with the WISPA consensus, but it seems to me
that if there are more than 10 white space channels in a given area,
2nd Memorandum and Order
http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/index.do?document=301652
Rick Harnish
Executive Director
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 WISPA Office
Skype: rick.harnish.
rharn...@wispa.org
Hmm... looks like we need to keep up the good fight:
Finally, it is important that we address additional proposals to set aside TV
channels in rural areas
for fixed licensed backhaul in the very near future. The ability of both new
and incumbent wireless
providers to provide 4G wireless
At 9/23/2010 03:43 PM, you wrote:
Hmm... looks like we need to keep up the good fight:
I know this is out of line with the WISPA consensus, but it seems to
me that if there are more than 10 white space channels in a given
area, then letting Part 101 point-to-point operations share them
And the fact still remains that if these areas are so rural, there will also
be access to 6 GHz and other licensed microwave channels for the same exact
arguments they make for the licensed backhaul use of TVWS.
Brian
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
But if they become licensed you have to also protect the first adjacent
channel for that licensed link. That would remove 3 channels from the
available white space and to get that proposed licensed link they also have
to protect the first adjacent channels of the incumbents. Remember when we
talk
I believe the FCC has another proceeding for freeing up 750 MHz of
white space in other bands for backhaul purposes. I believe 6 and 13 GHz.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/23/2010 3:04 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 9/23/2010 03:43 PM, you
Sorry guys,
Where does the FCC document speak of additional spectrum in the 3GHz band ???
F.
On 2010-09-23, at 3:43 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
Hmm... looks like we need to keep up the good fight:
Finally, it is important that we address additional proposals to set aside TV
channels in
I've wondered that as well, but the proceeding has been ongoing for
the better part of a decade, so it's quite possible that the 3 GHz
section is the 2650 band that has already been open for years.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/23/2010 5:15
2650 bad?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2010 7:28 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
10 matches
Mail list logo
