If you ALL joined one organization you would have a well-funded group to
fight this.
But most ISP's, WISP's, Hosts, and VoIP Providers don't pay for
membership any where.
Great at bitching. Champion, PhD bitching, but actually put up time and
money to make one single org work, not so much.
Wouldn't this be the equivalent of requiring all store owners to install
surveillance cameras and retain the tapes for 2 years just in case law
enforcement might need the footage for a conviction of some crime that
may happen in the future?
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Jack Unger
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 17:41:29 -0600, Sam Tetherow wrote
Wouldn't this be the equivalent of requiring all store owners to
install surveillance cameras and retain the tapes for 2 years just
in case law enforcement might need the footage for a conviction of
some crime that may happen in the
http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/1984/3/
Sam Tetherow wrote:
Wouldn't this be the equivalent of requiring all store owners to install
surveillance cameras and retain the tapes for 2 years just in case law
enforcement might need the footage for a conviction of some crime that
may
http://news.com.com/Justice+Department+takes+aim+at+image-sharing+sites/2100-1028_3-6163679.html?tag=nefd.lede
--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
not going to do that.
How about we push back ? :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 11:57 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Justice Department Takes Aim at Image-Sharing Sites
http
Yeah, I noticed that too.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: Rick Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2007 4:20 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Justice Department Takes Aim at Image-Sharing Sites
yeah interesting quote...
Only
