Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-26 Thread Doug Ratcliffe
But why not get a SBC certified as a motherboard, like a MSI, Asus, etc? The power supply (DC 12V) is already certified most of the time, and the case itself, how many times have you seen a Foxconn or Antec case with no power supply have a sticker on it in the first place? So SBC=motherboard,

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-26 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
- Original Message - From: "Scott Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 9:22 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equipment approval > Actually, the SBC is never an inten

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
- Original Message - From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 8:22 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equipment approval > Mark, > > I agree with you on many

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
But Jack, they don't have to. Anyone can. - Original Message - From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 2:03 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equipment ap

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
- Original Message - From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 1:33 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equipment approval > > > > Yes, we still need to submit

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
THAT's the one I've been waiting for. This pretty much rules out any intent what so ever that WE can use this to mix and match transmitters. Marlon (509) 982-2181 (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)WISP Operator sinc

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Doug Ratcliffe
Ok, I can see several things in this ruling. It's of course referring to consumer installed PCI/USB/miniPCI(we sell retail boxed laptop wireless cards for consumer install). Well, these cards are certified SEPARATE from the computer itself, so Netgear, Dlink, Linksys can have a wide range of ant

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Tim Kerns
I find reading all these notices very difficult... I think they hire writers just to confuse us Ok, here is my thoughts.. Manufacture A designs and builds a radio card (minipci), and develops the firmware to operate it.They then get FCC certification for this radio, firmware, and (hopeful

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
- Original Message - From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 12:21 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equipment approval > Tim, > > I read the 2nd Report an

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Mike Hammett
Probably not. :-p Not that I don't want to, but my searching abilities aren't so good. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
Nope. Not what it says. It's very specific about the antenna AND cabling used. What it means is that if you build a laptop (or some such device) and wish to slap in an atheros vs. prism rf section you can do that without having to recertify the whole shebang. They SPECIFICALLY excluded the

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Mike Hammett
It had been discussed on the Part 15 lists for that time and I remember reading an FCC publication about it a while ago. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Dawn DiPietro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List"

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
I read that just about all the way through. It appears we can now certify a mini-pci radio with some specific gain antennas, and use it in any "control" board. There seems to be some requirement that we demonstrate the software can't or doesn't cause the module to operate outside of certified pa

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Mike Hammett
I thought that was put in to effect a year or two ago. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: "Tim Kerns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:54 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Modificat

Re: [WISPA] Modifications of Parts 2 and 15 of the ,Commission’s Rules for unlicensed devices and,equ ipment approval

2007-04-25 Thread Tim Kerns
Am I reading this correctly Does this mean that if a mfg of a mini pci radio gets it certified with different antenna, that it then can be put into ANY base unit and be certified? Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this what we have been asking for? Tim - Original Message -