Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality

2009-09-19 Thread RickG
: Saturday, September 19, 2009 4:38 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality Congress and the FCC would define reasonable. It's their job to write the laws and make the rules. Net neutrality (NN) is about free speech. NN would prohibit your carrier from delaying your

[WISPA] Net Neutrality

2009-08-06 Thread Steve Barnes
Why do these guys get published? http://ifwnewsletters.newsletters.infoworld.com/t/5615001/250703550/209575/0/ I added a comment. Steve Barnes Manager PCS-WIN RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service Character cannot be developed in ease and quiet. Only through experience of trial and suffering

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality

2009-08-06 Thread jp
Strange; It's nothing to do with Net Neutrality. It's just the dark side of the Apple software business showing through. On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:59:43PM -0400, Steve Barnes wrote: Why do these guys get published?

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality

2009-08-06 Thread Josh Luthman
I won't read it, has Apple. On 8/6/09, jp j...@saucer.midcoast.com wrote: Strange; It's nothing to do with Net Neutrality. It's just the dark side of the Apple software business showing through. On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 03:59:43PM -0400, Steve Barnes wrote: Why do these guys get published?

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality

2009-08-06 Thread RickG
Good post and comment Steve. I feel the same way. The entitlement attitude is taking this country down. -RickG On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Steve Barnesst...@pcswin.com wrote: Why do these guys get published? http://ifwnewsletters.newsletters.infoworld.com/t/5615001/250703550/209575/0/ I

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality - a somewhat different take

2007-03-04 Thread Tim Wolfe
After reading this, it becomes very obvious this person does not have a clue? (Or should I say, he is owned by the telcos?) wispa wrote: You can take his views however you wish... But NN legislation is probably on the way, and this could get real ugly...REAL ugly real fast. When DC takes

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality - a somewhat different take

2007-03-04 Thread wispa
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 10:52:54 -0500, Tim Wolfe wrote After reading this, it becomes very obvious this person does not have a clue? (Or should I say, he is owned by the telcos?) Now, let's not fall into this trap, of saying that everyone who doesn't advocate NN in any and every form is owned by

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality - a somewhat different take

2007-03-04 Thread John Scrivner
Mark your calendars folks, me and Mark K are in agreement for once. Those who support Net Neutrality without exception have never had to track, isolate and repair infected PCs spewing out spam or replicative exploits to the masses. We should have a right to decide what we allow on our

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality - a somewhat different take

2007-03-04 Thread George Rogato
http://ftc.gov/opp/workshops/broadband/index.html If anyone is really interested in what the big boys have to say and how each side looks at things. I watched this last weekend, was interesting. George John Scrivner wrote: Mark your calendars folks, me and Mark K are in agreement for once.

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality - a somewhat different take

2007-03-04 Thread George Rogato
Panel 3 might get to the point quicker. It's titled: Discrimination, Blockage, and Vertical Integration George Rogato wrote: http://ftc.gov/opp/workshops/broadband/index.html If anyone is really interested in what the big boys have to say and how each side looks at things. I watched this

[WISPA] Net Neutrality - a somewhat different take

2007-03-03 Thread wispa
You can take his views however you wish... But NN legislation is probably on the way, and this could get real ugly...REAL ugly real fast. When DC takes on a problem, whether or not it really exists, it turns political instantly, and we could be the ones that get whipsawed.

[WISPA] Net Neutrality article by Robert X. Cringely

2006-06-26 Thread Pete Davis
Sorry for the cross-post. Having not really been following the whole Neutrality Debate, this clarified some stuff for me. I hope you enjoy it. Copied from: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060622.html June 22, 2006 Net Neutered: Why don't they tell us ending Net Neutrality might kill

RE: [WISPA] Net Neutrality article by Robert X. Cringely

2006-06-26 Thread Jeff Broadwick
] Net Neutrality article by Robert X. Cringely Sorry for the cross-post. Having not really been following the whole Neutrality Debate, this clarified some stuff for me. I hope you enjoy it. Copied from: http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20060622.html June 22, 2006 Net Neutered: Why don't

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality article by Robert X. Cringely

2006-06-26 Thread Pete Davis
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete Davis Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 6:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com; WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] Net Neutrality article by Robert X. Cringely Sorry for the cross-post. Having not really been following

Re: [WISPA] Net Neutrality and AOL ...It Begins

2006-04-19 Thread Peter R.
. Matt Larsen - Lists wrote: I was able to go to the Freedom to Connect conference earlier this month on behalf of WISPA. Net neutrality was one of the hot topics of the conference, but there was a lot of disagreement on how it should (or should not) be controlled. This email about the subject

<    1   2   3