If I understand correctly, There is no limit. But I vaguely remember
something about OSPF being unstable with 500+ routers. As you start to get
to much crosstalk overhead.
If its a big area you would need to do like OSPF and BGP I don't remember
how it went, something like transit routes with
I'm pretty sure the limit is just CPU/Memory. We currently 112
routing entries in one of our networks, this is on a network with 24
OSPF routers.
-Kevin
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Jory Privett j...@wccs.net wrote:
For all of you routing gurus out there, On MikroTiks version, or any
I think a good OSPF single area would be around 75 routers. Over that
you get quite a bit of traffic. Not saying that this is a hard limit,
just a rule of thumb.
---
Dennis Burgess, CCNA, A+, Mikrotik Certified Trainer
WISPA Board Member
Using StarOS we have about 480 subnet routes propagating throughout our
network. This represents approximately 220 routed devices.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Dennis Burgess wrote:
I think a good OSPF single area would be around 75 routers. Over that
you get quite a bit of traffic. Not
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:33 -0500, Jory Privett wrote:
For all of you routing gurus out there, On MikroTiks version,
or any other brand, of OSPF what is the maximum number of routes
or routers in a single OSPF Area? Is this only limitied by CPU/Memory
or is there something else that
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 09:44 -0600, Kevin Neal wrote:
I'm pretty sure the limit is just CPU/Memory. We currently 112
routing entries in one of our networks, this is on a network with 24
OSPF routers.
Number of routes is not that much of a problem. I have one customer
with about 8k OSPF
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 13:06 -0500, Butch Evans wrote:
So, the short answer is: Keep the number of interfaces around (or
below) 100 or so.
I should add that I DO have customers who have well over 150 ROUTERS
with multiple interfaces in a single area. This limit is not a hard
limit. The other
