RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Also just noticed that the TCP test results as well as not taking into account the TCP acknowledgements it also doesn't include the TCP header and IP header. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 20 October 2005 13:11 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 UPDATE Just tested with 2 P4's at each end of a StarVX link running on the 2 port WAR (266Mhz CPU). Bi-direction test using TCP, random data (uncompressible) shows 35-36mbps in both directions (aggregate throughput of 70-72mbps). These figures do not take into account TCP acknowledgements so the real throughput is a little higher. The StarVX's report throughput of around 37-39mbps in both rx and tx. Many thanks, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 20 October 2005 09:32 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 The first tests I did where with a routed topology through 2 StarVX routers but these most recent tests is with all interfaces bridged and the StarVX client as a wireless client bridge which I believe is based on WDS. If your asymmetric performance with the RB532's is between 12 and 18mbps I wouldn't say your seeing similar performance as I am seeing 40mbps and 27.7mbps when transmitting and receiving at the same time using random (uncompressible) tcp based data. The tests are based on default packet sizes however, we run M3P (ip packing) between the Mikrotiks and when testing with small packets (50-100byte) I see the same results. The only problem with M3P is that it adds 15ms of delay in each direction under low loads. This means you see pings with a round trip time of +30ms. This does however improve when more and more traffic is passed over the link as M3P either waits for 1500bytes of traffic or 15ms to expire (which ever comes first). The difference in upload and download speed I have so far put down to one system being a 2.4GHz CPU and the other being a 533MHz CPU. Hopefully I can test with 2 P4's later today. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: 20 October 2005 04:34 To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul Hendry wrote: Managed to scavenge a P4 system together for testing purposes. Hey, as long as you're doubling as my personal IT lab... :) My tests so far have just been traditional AP/client mode, and I'm seeing the same sort of asymmetrical performance you are. With a pair of RB532s, depending on the random-data and packet size settings, I'm floating between 12 and 18Mbps. Thing is, I always get better performance with traffic going client-to-AP than AP-to-client. Have you, or will you, test with WDS mode? If you've already done so, are you getting better or worse performance that way? (I may or may not be able to try that particular setup before I leave for vacation on Friday. Probably not, because I've not worked with RouterOS' wireless stuff before and I may not be able to figure out how to set it up. :) Also, are you using the default packet sizes or have you been playing with those too? At least in wired network testing I've done before, the real worst-case scenario involves using the smallest packets you can get away with (because of the extra overhead in packet creation). David Smith MVN.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/142 - Release Date: 18/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
So you are thinking the asymmetry was a processing problem? Scott Reed Owner NewWays Wireless Networking Network Design, Installation and Administration www.nwwnet.net -- Original Message --- From: Paul Hendry [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org Sent: Thu, 20 Oct 2005 13:10:44 +0100 Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 UPDATE Just tested with 2 P4's at each end of a StarVX link running on the 2 port WAR (266Mhz CPU). Bi-direction test using TCP, random data (uncompressible) shows 35-36mbps in both directions (aggregate throughput of 70-72mbps). These figures do not take into account TCP acknowledgements so the real throughput is a little higher. The StarVX's report throughput of around 37-39mbps in both rx and tx. Many thanks, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 20 October 2005 09:32 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 The first tests I did where with a routed topology through 2 StarVX routers but these most recent tests is with all interfaces bridged and the StarVX client as a wireless client bridge which I believe is based on WDS. If your asymmetric performance with the RB532's is between 12 and 18mbps I wouldn't say your seeing similar performance as I am seeing 40mbps and 27.7mbps when transmitting and receiving at the same time using random (uncompressible) tcp based data. The tests are based on default packet sizes however, we run M3P (ip packing) between the Mikrotiks and when testing with small packets (50-100byte) I see the same results. The only problem with M3P is that it adds 15ms of delay in each direction under low loads. This means you see pings with a round trip time of +30ms. This does however improve when more and more traffic is passed over the link as M3P either waits for 1500bytes of traffic or 15ms to expire (which ever comes first). The difference in upload and download speed I have so far put down to one system being a 2.4GHz CPU and the other being a 533MHz CPU. Hopefully I can test with 2 P4's later today. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: 20 October 2005 04:34 To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul Hendry wrote: Managed to scavenge a P4 system together for testing purposes. Hey, as long as you're doubling as my personal IT lab... :) My tests so far have just been traditional AP/client mode, and I'm seeing the same sort of asymmetrical performance you are. With a pair of RB532s, depending on the random-data and packet size settings, I'm floating between 12 and 18Mbps. Thing is, I always get better performance with traffic going client-to-AP than AP-to-client. Have you, or will you, test with WDS mode? If you've already done so, are you getting better or worse performance that way? (I may or may not be able to try that particular setup before I leave for vacation on Friday. Probably not, because I've not worked with RouterOS' wireless stuff before and I may not be able to figure out how to set it up. :) Also, are you using the default packet sizes or have you been playing with those too? At least in wired network testing I've done before, the real worst-case scenario involves using the smallest packets you can get away with (because of the extra overhead in packet creation). David Smith MVN.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/142 - Release Date: 18/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul, Was this turbo mode or standard? Thanks Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:11 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 UPDATE Just tested with 2 P4's at each end of a StarVX link running on the 2 port WAR (266Mhz CPU). Bi-direction test using TCP, random data (uncompressible) shows 35-36mbps in both directions (aggregate throughput of 70-72mbps). These figures do not take into account TCP acknowledgements so the real throughput is a little higher. The StarVX's report throughput of around 37-39mbps in both rx and tx. Many thanks, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 20 October 2005 09:32 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 The first tests I did where with a routed topology through 2 StarVX routers but these most recent tests is with all interfaces bridged and the StarVX client as a wireless client bridge which I believe is based on WDS. If your asymmetric performance with the RB532's is between 12 and 18mbps I wouldn't say your seeing similar performance as I am seeing 40mbps and 27.7mbps when transmitting and receiving at the same time using random (uncompressible) tcp based data. The tests are based on default packet sizes however, we run M3P (ip packing) between the Mikrotiks and when testing with small packets (50-100byte) I see the same results. The only problem with M3P is that it adds 15ms of delay in each direction under low loads. This means you see pings with a round trip time of +30ms. This does however improve when more and more traffic is passed over the link as M3P either waits for 1500bytes of traffic or 15ms to expire (which ever comes first). The difference in upload and download speed I have so far put down to one system being a 2.4GHz CPU and the other being a 533MHz CPU. Hopefully I can test with 2 P4's later today. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: 20 October 2005 04:34 To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul Hendry wrote: Managed to scavenge a P4 system together for testing purposes. Hey, as long as you're doubling as my personal IT lab... :) My tests so far have just been traditional AP/client mode, and I'm seeing the same sort of asymmetrical performance you are. With a pair of RB532s, depending on the random-data and packet size settings, I'm floating between 12 and 18Mbps. Thing is, I always get better performance with traffic going client-to-AP than AP-to-client. Have you, or will you, test with WDS mode? If you've already done so, are you getting better or worse performance that way? (I may or may not be able to try that particular setup before I leave for vacation on Friday. Probably not, because I've not worked with RouterOS' wireless stuff before and I may not be able to figure out how to set it up. :) Also, are you using the default packet sizes or have you been playing with those too? At least in wired network testing I've done before, the real worst-case scenario involves using the smallest packets you can get away with (because of the extra overhead in packet creation). David Smith MVN.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/142 - Release Date: 18/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.2/140 - Release Date: 10/18/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.2/140 - Release Date: 10/18/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
Re: [WISPA] Licensed band radio manufacturers
I'am a radio manufacturer out of Bradenton Florida, We make 2.4 and 5.8 ghz 11 meg spread spectrum radios, plus we have a new generation radio coming out soon that will go up to 54 meg.These radios can either be outdoor mount or indoor mount. The out door are power over ethernet.Point to point, Point to multipoint, DHCP,NAT,Routing, these radios do it all and they are very reliable. Have many links out ther for over 8 years with no problems. Give a call or visit our website Rob Maier Director of Field Services 1-941-744-2511 Global Wireless Solutions and Technologies www.globalwireless-inc.comDan Petermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anybody know if there is a list somewhere that lists equipment manufacturers besides typing in every search keyword I can think of into Google?-- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgSubscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wirelessArchives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.-- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Licensed band radio manufacturers
Looking for licensed band, 100Mb, full duplex radios. The reason is I'm looking at 100+ air miles and want to have as few hops as possible, with no interference.Thank you for your reply and I'll have to check out your products.On Oct 20, 2005, at 7:24 AM, robert maier wrote:I'am a radio manufacturer out of Bradenton Florida, We make 2.4 and 5.8 ghz 11 meg spread spectrum radios, plus we have a new generation radio coming out soon that will go up to 54 meg. These radios can either be outdoor mount or indoor mount. The out door are power over ethernet. Point to point, Point to multipoint, DHCP,NAT,Routing, these radios do it all and they are very reliable. Have many links out ther for over 8 years with no problems. Give a call or visit our website Rob Maier Director of Field Services 1-941-744-2511 Global Wireless Solutions and Technologies www.globalwireless-inc.comDan Petermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anybody know if there is a list somewhere that lists equipment manufacturers besides typing in every search keyword I can think of into Google?-- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgSubscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wirelessArchives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.-- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.orgSubscribe/Unsubscribe:http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wirelessArchives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul Hendry wrote: If your asymmetric performance with the RB532's is between 12 and 18mbps I wouldn't say your seeing similar performance as I am seeing 40mbps and 27.7mbps when transmitting and receiving at the same time using random (uncompressible) tcp based data. I just meant similar as in asymmetrical, actually, not similar as in similar throughput. I was just using RB532s, and I'm pretty sure the tests are CPU-bound at this point. (Specifically, it apparently takes a lot of CPU to generate all those random packets...) I'm hoping to scrounge up another computer from somewhere, so I can run something like qcheck or nuttcp on either end of the link. David Smith MVN.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with good -65 signal and yes it would seem that the earlier differences in upload/download speeds was CPU related as both up and down look to be very close. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of danlist Sent: 20 October 2005 13:29 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul, Was this turbo mode or standard? Thanks Dan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 8:11 AM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 UPDATE Just tested with 2 P4's at each end of a StarVX link running on the 2 port WAR (266Mhz CPU). Bi-direction test using TCP, random data (uncompressible) shows 35-36mbps in both directions (aggregate throughput of 70-72mbps). These figures do not take into account TCP acknowledgements so the real throughput is a little higher. The StarVX's report throughput of around 37-39mbps in both rx and tx. Many thanks, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: 20 October 2005 09:32 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 The first tests I did where with a routed topology through 2 StarVX routers but these most recent tests is with all interfaces bridged and the StarVX client as a wireless client bridge which I believe is based on WDS. If your asymmetric performance with the RB532's is between 12 and 18mbps I wouldn't say your seeing similar performance as I am seeing 40mbps and 27.7mbps when transmitting and receiving at the same time using random (uncompressible) tcp based data. The tests are based on default packet sizes however, we run M3P (ip packing) between the Mikrotiks and when testing with small packets (50-100byte) I see the same results. The only problem with M3P is that it adds 15ms of delay in each direction under low loads. This means you see pings with a round trip time of +30ms. This does however improve when more and more traffic is passed over the link as M3P either waits for 1500bytes of traffic or 15ms to expire (which ever comes first). The difference in upload and download speed I have so far put down to one system being a 2.4GHz CPU and the other being a 533MHz CPU. Hopefully I can test with 2 P4's later today. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David E. Smith Sent: 20 October 2005 04:34 To: WISPA General List Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul Hendry wrote: Managed to scavenge a P4 system together for testing purposes. Hey, as long as you're doubling as my personal IT lab... :) My tests so far have just been traditional AP/client mode, and I'm seeing the same sort of asymmetrical performance you are. With a pair of RB532s, depending on the random-data and packet size settings, I'm floating between 12 and 18Mbps. Thing is, I always get better performance with traffic going client-to-AP than AP-to-client. Have you, or will you, test with WDS mode? If you've already done so, are you getting better or worse performance that way? (I may or may not be able to try that particular setup before I leave for vacation on Friday. Probably not, because I've not worked with RouterOS' wireless stuff before and I may not be able to figure out how to set it up. :) Also, are you using the default packet sizes or have you been playing with those too? At least in wired network testing I've done before, the real worst-case scenario involves using the smallest packets you can get away with (because of the extra overhead in packet creation). David Smith MVN.net -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/142 - Release Date: 18/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.12.4/143 - Release Date: 19/10/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Fw: [WISPA] Hurricane Wilma
fyi, urgent request from the FCC. At the bottom of this note I've copy and pasted the data from the attachment that Lauren had sent. I know many of the list won't allow the .doc attachment through laters, Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam - Original Message - From: Lauren VanWazer To: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 12:34 PM Subject: RE: [WISPA] Hurricane Wilma Marlon: I've attached a form explaining why we're interested in hearing from folks in the affected regions -- it will help us to ascertain the extent of the hurricane impact and faciliate sending help to the affected areas. Perhaps you want to float it to your WISP list. There's an e-mail box that we've set up [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- folks can e-mail us about hurricane issues there. Thanks, Lauren This was the attachment Hello. My name is Lauren Van Wazer and I work at the Office of Engineering and Technology at the Federal Communications Commission. We are aware that you may be working hard to prepare for hurricane Wilma and we do not wish to take up a lot of time. To the extent you're able, we're interested in how hurricane Wilma is impacting your ability to operate and provide service. We're trying to get a whole picture of the adverse impacts caused to the communications infrastructure by the hurricane. Also, we'd like to provide an avenue for you to communicate to the federal government issues relating to your communications network. So, we may be contacting you again over the next few days or, if you'd like, you can e-mail us directly, at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please understand that this process is entirely voluntary and you are under no obligation to provide any information, should you so choose. I'd like to ask you a few questions. Company Name: Contact Person: Telephone Number of Contact Person: Alternative Telephone Number: E-mail Address: General service coverage area (e.g., cities, counties, etc.): Type of equipment: -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Licensed band radio manufacturers
Well, John I agree, i called the guy and got not available on his cell, and mailbox full on his v-mail, not much on his web site either. he really must be a busy man. Ron Wallace Hahnron, Inc. 220 S. Jackson St. Addison, MI 49220 Phone: (517) 547-8410 Mobile: (517) 605-4542 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Hurricane Wilma
Marlon Here is a list I haven't seen your post on yet: wisp mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.tog.net/mailman/listinfo/wisp You might want to send it there as well. George Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote: Hi All, The FCC is starting up their hurricane team again for Wilma. They have asked WISPA to provide as much contact info for anyone in or near the landfall zones as possible. If you are in or near the projected path of Wilma please shoot me an OFF LIST message with the current subject line. Include the following data: Company name: Main contact: Office number: Main contact cell number: Complete address: GPS coordinates: Assets you have (climbers, extra hardware etc.): Equipment mainly used (so we can match up those with extra stuff with what you may need): We'll keep an eye on this storm and if it looks like it's going to hit hard we'll see if we can get people in the nearby areas ready to move in as soon as it's safe. IF you get hit and need help feel free to contact me directly at this email address, my cell phone (509.988.0260) or my office phone (number below) at any time. Thanks and good luck! Marlon (509) 982-2181 Equipment sales (408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services 42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp! 64.146.146.12 (net meeting) www.odessaoffice.com/wireless www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
[WISPA] Looks like the Senate has already figured out how to spend the money
that they will get from auctioning off the tv spectrum: http://tinyurl.com/8qz67 The measure provides $4.8 billion to help with the federal budget and allocates $1 billion for making communications by emergency personnel interoperable. If the auction raises more than $10 billion, the bill calls for that extra money to be used for deficit reduction. A company like Motorola Inc. could benefit since it makes communications equipment used by emergency personnel. George -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
