RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Do the Orthogon units compress the data like all Atheros based solutions or are these figures regardless of the type of traffic? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of G.Villarini Sent: 14 November 2005 00:47 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 They're in a semi nlos situation, plus lots of noise we are pulling 200 mbps Gino A. Villarini, Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.aeronetpr.com 787.767.7466 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 4:35 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Hey Gino, Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort of obstructions are there and what kind of throughput can you get? Looking to get a pair for a link but a bit expensive if they can't deliver. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of G.Villarini Sent: 11 October 2005 02:38 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 They only thing I haven't opened yet is my set of Orthogon Spectras ... too expensive .. Gino A. Villarini, Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.aeronetpr.com 787.767.7466 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:51 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Ahhh you've never cracked one open to see what's inside? Ask Gino, you have to take everything apart and see what makes it tick. :) George Matt Liotta wrote: > That's good to know if for no other reason than to use better coax > jumpers. It is really annoying that Trango uses RP-SMA connectors as > opposed to N. > > -Matt > > G.Villarini wrote: > >> That's a easy mod, I have done it myself... Trango gear has a 2 mcx >> jacks on >> the pcb ... >> > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/126 - Release Date: 09/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
They're in a semi nlos situation, plus lots of noise we are pulling 200 mbps Gino A. Villarini, Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.aeronetpr.com 787.767.7466 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 4:35 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Hey Gino, Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort of obstructions are there and what kind of throughput can you get? Looking to get a pair for a link but a bit expensive if they can't deliver. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of G.Villarini Sent: 11 October 2005 02:38 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 They only thing I haven't opened yet is my set of Orthogon Spectras ... too expensive .. Gino A. Villarini, Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.aeronetpr.com 787.767.7466 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:51 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Ahhh you've never cracked one open to see what's inside? Ask Gino, you have to take everything apart and see what makes it tick. :) George Matt Liotta wrote: > That's good to know if for no other reason than to use better coax > jumpers. It is really annoying that Trango uses RP-SMA connectors as > opposed to N. > > -Matt > > G.Villarini wrote: > >> That's a easy mod, I have done it myself... Trango gear has a 2 mcx >> jacks on >> the pcb ... >> > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/126 - Release Date: 09/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
I have installed 3 Spectra Links so far. NLOS performance will be best in municipal environments with plenty of buildings to bounce off of. I did try to make a 6 mile NLOS link with trees in the path before I recommended the construction of a tower. I wanted to see the potential. If the path obstructions are in the middle of the path there is a much higher probability of success, however, if the obstructions are near the ends of the link the chances of success are much less. This particular path is in a rural area without reflective surfaces. NLOS links will drop bandwidth potential rapidly. All calculations I have done so far point to a 20 mile limit for 200+ Mbps throughput. The newest firmware released a few weeks ago improved bandwidth on one of these links 50 Mbps. I was very impressed with that, good job Orthogon. That link is running 6 miles with LOS and 2’ Dual Pol dishes. It is running about 175 Mbps currently. We will be switching to 3’ dishes in a few weeks to peak out the performance capabilities of the link. Rick Harnish President OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc. 260-827-2482 Office 260-307-4000 Cell 260-918-4340 VoIP www.oibw.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Hendry Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 4:46 PM To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 What about NLOS (trees and buildings) @ 3km with a max EIRP of 33db (as that’s what we are stuck with in the UK L) or 28km with good LOS/Fresnel clearance with max EIRP of 33db? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver Sent: 13 November 2005 21:04 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul, I haven't tried the Spectra yet but am planning some links with the Link Estimator. Are you familiar with this tool? You may have to attend a training session to get access to the partner site and profile generator. However I'd be happy to generate a path report for you .. the tool is quite good, and at least the sales people will tell you it's very accurate - if it says 99.999% reliability, that's what you'll get. Trees and other obstructions can be added to the profile manually. The single biggest factor is antenna gain .. you just won't get 200 Mbps over 40 km without 4' dishes on both sides. Best, -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
What about NLOS (trees and buildings) @ 3km with a max EIRP of 33db (as that’s what we are stuck with in the UK L) or 28km with good LOS/Fresnel clearance with max EIRP of 33db? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dylan Oliver Sent: 13 November 2005 21:04 To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Paul, I haven't tried the Spectra yet but am planning some links with the Link Estimator. Are you familiar with this tool? You may have to attend a training session to get access to the partner site and profile generator. However I'd be happy to generate a path report for you .. the tool is quite good, and at least the sales people will tell you it's very accurate - if it says 99.999% reliability, that's what you'll get. Trees and other obstructions can be added to the profile manually. The single biggest factor is antenna gain .. you just won't get 200 Mbps over 40 km without 4' dishes on both sides. Best, -- Dylan Oliver Primaverity, LLC -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Paul, I haven't tried the Spectra yet but am planning some links with the Link Estimator. Are you familiar with this tool? You may have to attend a training session to get access to the partner site and profile generator. However I'd be happy to generate a path report for you .. the tool is quite good, and at least the sales people will tell you it's very accurate - if it says 99.999% reliability, that's what you'll get. Trees and other obstructions can be added to the profile manually. The single biggest factor is antenna gain .. you just won't get 200 Mbps over 40 km without 4' dishes on both sides. Best,-- Dylan OliverPrimaverity, LLC -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532
Hey Gino, Are you using the Spectra's in a NLOS environment? If so, what sort of obstructions are there and what kind of throughput can you get? Looking to get a pair for a link but a bit expensive if they can't deliver. Cheers, P. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of G.Villarini Sent: 11 October 2005 02:38 To: 'WISPA General List' Subject: RE: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 They only thing I haven't opened yet is my set of Orthogon Spectras ... too expensive .. Gino A. Villarini, Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.aeronetpr.com 787.767.7466 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 8:51 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Atheros speed WRAP vs RB532 Ahhh you've never cracked one open to see what's inside? Ask Gino, you have to take everything apart and see what makes it tick. :) George Matt Liotta wrote: > That's good to know if for no other reason than to use better coax > jumpers. It is really annoying that Trango uses RP-SMA connectors as > opposed to N. > > -Matt > > G.Villarini wrote: > >> That's a easy mod, I have done it myself... Trango gear has a 2 mcx >> jacks on >> the pcb ... >> > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.13/126 - Release Date: 09/10/2005 -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.362 / Virus Database: 267.13.0/167 - Release Date: 11/11/2005 -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
