Recently, there have been some misleading advertisements promising turn-key
3.65 GHz licensing services as a means of avoiding interference in congested
license-exempt ISM/UNII bands. Although the FCC issued adopted rules back
in March 2005 to open access to new spectrum for wireless broadband in
Tom,
DSSS modulation is a single-carrier modulation scheme, BPSK operates much in
the same way as DSSS which usually are much more robust then other forms of
modulation because they seem to run like a single carrier modulation
schema's.
The neat thing about BPSK is its ability to take
As you start to walk up the modulation line you definitely need more C/I,
but you also start to loose the ability to use full power out of the radio.
A small bit of trivial regarding this issue
With higher order modulation schemes, the EVM (Error Vector Magnitude) can
be so high that even on a
what brand?
dustin jurman wrote:
Thank you Charles,
We use radio's that use 256 dots of modulation.
Dustin Jurman
President
Rapid Systems Corporation
1211 N. Westshore Blvd
Tampa, FL 33607
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
As an FYI, we've had wifi in cop cars since 2002. They get 15 MILES and can
roam from tower to tower as well.
http://www.odessaoffice.com/wireless/mobile.htm
We used to just use the essid of ANY and they'd tie into any of my towers
that they could see. That no longer works due to all of the
Great post Mac. Thanks for the vote of confidence!
Now go put those comments on every OTHER list you're on! We need this kind
of thing said, over and over and over, in places that don't know about or
don't participate in wispa.
We need Stu to join!
Marlon
(509) 982-2181
Why not use the same essid on all your towers? That works for me.
Or use MikroTik AP's with a secondary essid that is the same on every
tower just for roaming users.
Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:
As an FYI, we've had wifi in cop cars since 2002. They get 15 MILES
and can roam
Moto/Orthogon
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Mario Pommier
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006
11:14 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16
DSSS interference
what brand?
dustin jurman wrote:
Thank you Charles, We use
We might be interested. Contact me offlist with details.
JohnnyO
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 12:59 -0500, Brian Rohrbacher wrote:
If anyone is or knows of an Alabama WISP who is buying up WISPs in other
parts of the country, please hit me offlist.
--
Brian Rohrbacher
Reliable Internet, LLC
Only Atheros 5004 and higher chipset is capable of this mode.
So you will need a 5213 or newer card. Your 5212 and 5211 cards can not do
this.
Also the 5004 (4th Gen Atheros) that uses the AR5213 chip can be set to
transmit on 5 or 10Mhz only frequency BUT it still listens to the entire
normal
I am looking for some Alvaion 900Mhz SUs with antennas and power supplies; new or used.If anyone has any available for sale, please contact me off-list with price and availability.Thanks,Cliff
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
Cliff may I have your contact info? I'm a distributor.
Mike Lake
(941) 718-0821 mobile #-Original Message-From: Cliff Leboeuf [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.orgSent: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 13:46:55 -0600Subject: [WISPA] Looking for Alvarion 900Mhz Subs
I am looking
Rob,
Give me a call on my cell #
( 941 ) 718-0821
I'll try to call you tomarrow on my way to Orlando. I can help you out.
Mike Lake-Original Message-From: robert maier [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: wireless@wispa.orgSent: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 09:34:07 -0800 (PST)Subject: [WISPA] Gigabit wireless
Thats exactly what we are trying to do, but its not working, using version
9.12.
If I try ping radios
When sniffing, the station sees traffic comming in, but the AP-bridge, sees
no traffic comming in.
I correctly have put both interfaces Ether1 and WDS1 to the same bridge1.
Won't pass
Thanks, Charles and Dustin,
The challenge I'm working on is to determine if the degregation of my test
link, is caused by
A) Distortion on the transmitter, at full power? or
B) Overload or lack of acuracy of the receiver. or
C) Or Just plain interference creeping in. (tested at about -80db)
Tom,
Can you try changing the MT to use only 5mhz or 10mhz of spectrum just
to see what that does? Or even temporarily change to an unused band with
the MT (5.9ghz) to see what happens? It may help isolate what's really
going on.
Travis
Microserv
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Thanks, Charles and
What I'm more interested in is what were the agriculture applications?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: James McKinion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 5:58 PM
Subject:
Does anybody have a copy of a service agreement they would mind sharing. I
have a project coming up with a monthly service agreement with a three hour
response if the problem can't be resolved by phone. The organization wants
something with the typical legal mumbo jumbo wording instead of the
Thought I'd share my test results on NStreme.
I am happy with John Tulley's (Mikrotik's) attitude, in the sense that they
are constantly trying to improve their product, and listening to comments
from users of their product, and attempting to make sure users are not
misinformed about the
How do you change channel width?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 9:36 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] BPSK QAM16
This problem was solved thanks to prompt tech support from Wisp-Router.
With NStreme enabled, it is necessary to assign the IP to the Bridged port,
not ether1.
However, without Nstreme enabled, it works fine with IP assigned to Ether1,
as long as bridged to WLAN.
(The same way that always
21 matches
Mail list logo
