[WISPA] Re: [Fwd: TV White Space]

2006-05-08 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

Thanks Frannie,

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Frannie Wellings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John 
Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: TV White Space]



Hey Marlon and John,

Well, there's lots going on.

In the House, Inslee and Blackburn have introduced their bill, the 
American Broadband for Communities Act: 
http://www.freepress.net/congress/billinfo.php?id=172


In the Senate, we have the two bills S. 2327 and S. 2332, and now Senator 
Stevens has included unlicensed spectrum in his new massive telecom bill. 
It's called the Communications, Consumers' Choice, and Broadband 
Deployment Act of 2006. It would require the FCC, within 270 days of 
passage, to finish the pending white spaces proceeding. It says that 
within 270 days, “a certified unlicensed device may use eligible broadcast 
television frequencies in a manner that protects licensees from harmful 
interference.”


It also, as I understand, would extend USF to broadband though I don't yet 
have an analysis of this section. Much of USF implementation would be 
dealt with at the FCC. USF is not included in the big House telecom bill: 
http://www.freepress.net/congress/billinfo.php?id=169.


The question now is what happens with these two massive telecom bills and 
the separate unlicensed bill in the House.


I'll give you more information when I have it available, but please 
continue to ask if you have any questions.


Best,

Frannie

Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:


Hi Frannie,

Any idea where this issue stands at this time?

How about USF?

thanks,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage) Consulting services
42846865 (icq) And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - From: Frannie Wellings 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 2:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: TV White Space]



Hi,

No problem here. The impression below is false. There was even a staff 
briefing on Friday in the Senate on white space use for unlicensed. I 
know a number of people who work in the Senate and who did the briefing, 
Ben being one of them, and this was not even discussed. It's not going 
around on the House side either. The discussion is all about broadband 
access. Unlicensed vs. licensed has been discussed, but there's no move 
to change it to licensed use.


So it's okay. WISPA should do a House and Senate call-in very soon 
though to promote the bills in the Senate and the proposed bill by 
Inslee and Blackburn in the House. I'll help in whatever way I can.


Best,

F

At 10:40 AM -0500 4/15/06, John Scrivner wrote:

Hi Frannie. As you can see below we have a problem. Can you fill me in 
on whatever you know about who, what, how this effort is being done to 
kill our chances at the whitespaces? We had a significant presence to 
help during Katrina and used a great deal of unlicensed frequencies to 
help restore communications. I think we need to drive home the point 
that if WISPs and others have this spectrum available we will implement 
it and have it ready when disaster hits. Unlicensed deployed for 
broadband delivery can help make disaster communications infrastructure 
ready to use and already deployed. We should be able to dedicate a 
large part of the available time on the network to first responder 
traffic only which in essence gives them a chunk of the spectrum 
without having to dedicate the frequencies to this and without losing 
its usability for broadband to the people. Why leave large swaths of 
spectrum dormant only to be used during an emergency when the same 
spectrum can easily and effectively serve both interests? Let me know 
your thoughts.

Thank you,
Scriv

PS. I want to put together a Call to Action via email and on the 
website for all WISPs regarding the current white spaces bills once 
they leave committee. Please let me know how we can best help.





Mike said:

Hi guys

Giving you guys a heads up here as I can imagine you would be very
disappointed if the chatter I'm hearing comes true.

As you know I'm on that FCC panel for Katrina Communications failures.
During many of the discussions and research there is a lot of chatter 
going
on all over D.C. about using the TV white spaces (or at least a large 
chunk

of them) for Emergency Response ONLY(much the same as 4.9GHz).

I know you guys are working hard on trying to get the TV space for the
License Exempt WISPs, but the current chatter could have a 

Re: [WISPA] Re: [Fwd: TV White Space]

2006-05-08 Thread Dawn DiPietro

Marlon,

Cool. This sounds like a step in the right direction.

Regards,
Dawn DiPietro



Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:


Thanks Frannie,

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - From: Frannie Wellings 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John 
Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: TV White Space]



Hey Marlon and John,

Well, there's lots going on.

In the House, Inslee and Blackburn have introduced their bill, the 
American Broadband for Communities Act: 
http://www.freepress.net/congress/billinfo.php?id=172


In the Senate, we have the two bills S. 2327 and S. 2332, and now 
Senator Stevens has included unlicensed spectrum in his new massive 
telecom bill. It's called the Communications, Consumers' Choice, and 
Broadband Deployment Act of 2006. It would require the FCC, within 
270 days of passage, to finish the pending white spaces proceeding. 
It says that within 270 days, “a certified unlicensed device may use 
eligible broadcast television frequencies in a manner that protects 
licensees from harmful interference.”


It also, as I understand, would extend USF to broadband though I 
don't yet have an analysis of this section. Much of USF 
implementation would be dealt with at the FCC. USF is not included in 
the big House telecom bill: 
http://www.freepress.net/congress/billinfo.php?id=169.


The question now is what happens with these two massive telecom bills 
and the separate unlicensed bill in the House.


I'll give you more information when I have it available, but please 
continue to ask if you have any questions.


Best,

Frannie



---
---

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Spectrum Analyzer

2006-05-08 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
EC carries a nice little unit from Anritsu (sp?).  Portable, battery 
operated, easy to use.  You'll need a converter to get the 2.4 gig version 
to work for 5.8 gig but that's not a big deal.


Perfect for a wisp.

laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Jory Privett [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:00 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Spectrum Analyzer



Can someone recommend a fairly simple spectrum analyzer  that will do 2.4
and 5.8. I need something that is portable and not to complicated to use.

Jory Privett
WCCS


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Re: [Fwd: TV White Space]

2006-05-08 Thread Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181

Maybe.  I've not read the bills.

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - 
From: Dawn DiPietro [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 9:09 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re: [Fwd: TV White Space]



Marlon,

Cool. This sounds like a step in the right direction.

Regards,
Dawn DiPietro



Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 wrote:


Thanks Frannie,

Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message - From: Frannie Wellings 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED]; John 
Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2006 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [Fwd: TV White Space]



Hey Marlon and John,

Well, there's lots going on.

In the House, Inslee and Blackburn have introduced their bill, the 
American Broadband for Communities Act: 
http://www.freepress.net/congress/billinfo.php?id=172


In the Senate, we have the two bills S. 2327 and S. 2332, and now 
Senator Stevens has included unlicensed spectrum in his new massive 
telecom bill. It's called the Communications, Consumers' Choice, and 
Broadband Deployment Act of 2006. It would require the FCC, within 270 
days of passage, to finish the pending white spaces proceeding. It says 
that within 270 days, “a certified unlicensed device may use eligible 
broadcast television frequencies in a manner that protects licensees 
from harmful interference.”


It also, as I understand, would extend USF to broadband though I don't 
yet have an analysis of this section. Much of USF implementation would 
be dealt with at the FCC. USF is not included in the big House telecom 
bill: http://www.freepress.net/congress/billinfo.php?id=169.


The question now is what happens with these two massive telecom bills 
and the separate unlicensed bill in the House.


I'll give you more information when I have it available, but please 
continue to ask if you have any questions.


Best,

Frannie



---
---

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Weird problem - 20 seconds latency and other oddness

2006-05-08 Thread David E. Smith
Okay, Scriv and I are stumped on this one.

Over the last couple of weeks, we've started seeing some very odd
oddness on a few of our 2.4GHz POPs. Not all, just some. Here's what
appears to be happening:

A couple times a day, usually during business hours, something somewhere
generates a massive amount of noise. Connections which report an RF
noise of -90 start showing noise levels of -60 (or worse in some cases),
as reported by our StarOS access point. If it really is RF noise, it's
very broad, as it's simultaneously hitting five or six POPs, some
several miles away, but all at the same time.

The towers are all running StarOS on Mikrotik RouterBoard hardware, with
a mix of Orinoco and Prism cards, some with amps, some not. Some have
sectored antennas (180 degrees), some have omnis. Between them, the
towers cover just about the entire 2.4 spectrum (obviously, one channel
per access point, but we're using at least channels 1, 4, 6, 8, and 11).

Those towers are basically identical to several other towers that aren't
affected.

The other really really weird part is the crazy latency. Pings to the
APs themselves are reliable, and our backhaul links (5.3 and 5.8 GHz)
don't seem to be affected. And pings to our end-customers don't seem to
get lost, they just take their sweet time getting there. While the
event is happening, I've seen pings that take in excess of twenty
seconds to complete their round trip.

64 bytes from 10.232.175.130: icmp_seq=7 ttl=62 time=27239 ms

(I think that's my record. In that particular test, there were no
packets lost, they just took a very long time to get there.)

I've checked or replaced just about everything I can think of in our
network that might cause something like this, and frankly, I'm stumped.
I don't think it's a network problem (traffic bursts or similar) because
of the weird bursts of RF noise. But that'd have to be one helluva burst
of noise to do what it's doing - affecting every channel across ten
miles at once.

I can go into more detail on any part of the network if you like, though
I think all the likely-relevant details are covered here.

Help!

David Smith
MVN.net
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Weird problem - 20 seconds latency and other oddness

2006-05-08 Thread Michael Watson
If this was rf noise, Arent hamm operators allowed in 2.4 with higher 
power limits? Could this account for the 5- 10 mile affected area?


-Michael


David E. Smith wrote:

Okay, Scriv and I are stumped on this one.

Over the last couple of weeks, we've started seeing some very odd
oddness on a few of our 2.4GHz POPs. Not all, just some. Here's what
appears to be happening:

A couple times a day, usually during business hours, something somewhere
generates a massive amount of noise. Connections which report an RF
noise of -90 start showing noise levels of -60 (or worse in some cases),
as reported by our StarOS access point. If it really is RF noise, it's
very broad, as it's simultaneously hitting five or six POPs, some
several miles away, but all at the same time.

The towers are all running StarOS on Mikrotik RouterBoard hardware, with
a mix of Orinoco and Prism cards, some with amps, some not. Some have
sectored antennas (180 degrees), some have omnis. Between them, the
towers cover just about the entire 2.4 spectrum (obviously, one channel
per access point, but we're using at least channels 1, 4, 6, 8, and 11).

Those towers are basically identical to several other towers that aren't
affected.

The other really really weird part is the crazy latency. Pings to the
APs themselves are reliable, and our backhaul links (5.3 and 5.8 GHz)
don't seem to be affected. And pings to our end-customers don't seem to
get lost, they just take their sweet time getting there. While the
event is happening, I've seen pings that take in excess of twenty
seconds to complete their round trip.

64 bytes from 10.232.175.130: icmp_seq=7 ttl=62 time=27239 ms

(I think that's my record. In that particular test, there were no
packets lost, they just took a very long time to get there.)

I've checked or replaced just about everything I can think of in our
network that might cause something like this, and frankly, I'm stumped.
I don't think it's a network problem (traffic bursts or similar) because
of the weird bursts of RF noise. But that'd have to be one helluva burst
of noise to do what it's doing - affecting every channel across ten
miles at once.

I can go into more detail on any part of the network if you like, though
I think all the likely-relevant details are covered here.

Help!

David Smith
MVN.net
  


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue

2006-05-08 Thread Peter R.
To fill in on rural gaps, ATT is selling Wildblue satellite internet 
service under its own brand.


[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_hi_te/at_t_satellite_broadband_1] 

The company already has been trying fixed wireless broadband in Alaska, 
Georgia and New Jersey. One of the technologies mentioned by ATT as 
part of the trials is WiMax, which is similar to the Wi-Fi technology 
that underlies Internet hot spots, but offers greater range and speed.
Posted by NSP Strategist to NSP Strategist 
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/05/att-reselling-wildblue.html at 
5/08/2006 04:40:00 PM


--


Regards,

Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect  Communicate
813.963.5884 
http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Spectrum Analyzer

2006-05-08 Thread rabbtux rabbtux

Marlon,

Could you post a URL?  what price range is the equipment?
Thanks - marshall

On 5/8/06, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

EC carries a nice little unit from Anritsu (sp?).  Portable, battery
operated, easy to use.  You'll need a converter to get the 2.4 gig version
to work for 5.8 gig but that's not a big deal.

Perfect for a wisp.

laters,
Marlon
(509) 982-2181   Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)Consulting services
42846865 (icq)And I run my own wisp!
64.146.146.12 (net meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam



- Original Message -
From: Jory Privett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 12:00 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Spectrum Analyzer


 Can someone recommend a fairly simple spectrum analyzer  that will do 2.4
 and 5.8. I need something that is portable and not to complicated to use.

 Jory Privett
 WCCS


 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue

2006-05-08 Thread JohnnyO
We've installed 9 Wild Blue systems so far here in South Louisiana /
Mississippi / Alabama / Texas areas and have had great success with
them. WildBlue will be sending up another bird soon to increase capacity
and add features. Compared to all the other satellite systems we've
dealt with, WildBlue hands down wins.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


To fill in on rural gaps, ATT is selling Wildblue satellite internet 
service under its own brand.

[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_hi_te/at_t_satellite_broadban
d_1] 

The company already has been trying fixed wireless broadband in Alaska, 
Georgia and New Jersey. One of the technologies mentioned by ATT as 
part of the trials is WiMax, which is similar to the Wi-Fi technology 
that underlies Internet hot spots, but offers greater range and speed.
Posted by NSP Strategist to NSP Strategist 
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/05/att-reselling-wildblue.html at 
5/08/2006 04:40:00 PM

-- 


Regards,

Peter
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect  Communicate
813.963.5884 
http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue

2006-05-08 Thread George Rogato

Hey Johnny

Whats the speeds and latency up and down?
How much do you get to make on it?


Thanks
George

JohnnyO wrote:

We've installed 9 Wild Blue systems so far here in South Louisiana /
Mississippi / Alabama / Texas areas and have had great success with
them. WildBlue will be sending up another bird soon to increase capacity
and add features. Compared to all the other satellite systems we've
dealt with, WildBlue hands down wins.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


To fill in on rural gaps, ATT is selling Wildblue satellite internet 
service under its own brand.


[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_hi_te/at_t_satellite_broadban
d_1] 

The company already has been trying fixed wireless broadband in Alaska, 
Georgia and New Jersey. One of the technologies mentioned by ATT as 
part of the trials is WiMax, which is similar to the Wi-Fi technology 
that underlies Internet hot spots, but offers greater range and speed.
Posted by NSP Strategist to NSP Strategist 
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/05/att-reselling-wildblue.html at 
5/08/2006 04:40:00 PM




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue

2006-05-08 Thread JohnnyO
We're seeing 1.5mbps / 220kbps pretty consistently. We've been able to
run VPNs and terminal services over it reliably. Latency is consistent
around 500ms-700ms. Much better then DirecWay.

How much are we making off of it ? Well - Not much at all from the
service but we're selling an SLA to the oilfield companies that we
service with these systems. Our mark-up is approx 5x-7x what the monthly
service costs us but we'll have someone on-site within 6hours if
something goes south.

Not sure if you could use the same selling point we can, but oilfield
companies love to be catered to.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 8:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


Hey Johnny

Whats the speeds and latency up and down?
How much do you get to make on it?


Thanks
George

JohnnyO wrote:
 We've installed 9 Wild Blue systems so far here in South Louisiana / 
 Mississippi / Alabama / Texas areas and have had great success with 
 them. WildBlue will be sending up another bird soon to increase 
 capacity and add features. Compared to all the other satellite systems

 we've dealt with, WildBlue hands down wins.
 
 JohnnyO
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of Peter R.
 Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue
 
 
 To fill in on rural gaps, ATT is selling Wildblue satellite internet
 service under its own brand.
 
 [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_hi_te/at_t_satellite_broadb
 an
 d_1] 
 
 The company already has been trying fixed wireless broadband in 
 Alaska,
 Georgia and New Jersey. One of the technologies mentioned by ATT as 
 part of the trials is WiMax, which is similar to the Wi-Fi technology 
 that underlies Internet hot spots, but offers greater range and
speed.
 Posted by NSP Strategist to NSP Strategist 
 http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/05/att-reselling-wildblue.html at 
 5/08/2006 04:40:00 PM
 

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue

2006-05-08 Thread George Rogato

JohnnyO wrote:
 but we're selling an SLA to the oilfield companies that we

service with these systems. Our mark-up is approx 5x-7x what the monthly
service costs us but we'll have someone on-site within 6hours if
something goes south.



Good deal you got there Johnny.

George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue

2006-05-08 Thread Joe Laura
Since the latency is consistant have you tried running any voip over it?
Just curious. If so, how is it? I was wondering why the price of gas has
been skyrocketing in Louisiana lately. Guess they have to cover their
payments to you.LOL Joe
Superior Wireless
New Orleans,La.
www.superior1.com
- Original Message -
From: JohnnyO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 8:13 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


 We've installed 9 Wild Blue systems so far here in South Louisiana /
 Mississippi / Alabama / Texas areas and have had great success with
 them. WildBlue will be sending up another bird soon to increase capacity
 and add features. Compared to all the other satellite systems we've
 dealt with, WildBlue hands down wins.

 JohnnyO

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Peter R.
 Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


 To fill in on rural gaps, ATT is selling Wildblue satellite internet
 service under its own brand.

 [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_hi_te/at_t_satellite_broadban
 d_1]

 The company already has been trying fixed wireless broadband in Alaska,
 Georgia and New Jersey. One of the technologies mentioned by ATT as
 part of the trials is WiMax, which is similar to the Wi-Fi technology
 that underlies Internet hot spots, but offers greater range and speed.
 Posted by NSP Strategist to NSP Strategist
 http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/05/att-reselling-wildblue.html at
 5/08/2006 04:40:00 PM

 --


 Regards,

 Peter
 RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
 We Help ISPs Connect  Communicate
 813.963.5884
 http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm


 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue

2006-05-08 Thread JohnnyO
Laura - if you can't beat the oilfield companies - CHARGE THE HELL OUT
OF THEM :) It eases the pain a bit.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joe Laura
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 9:08 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


Since the latency is consistant have you tried running any voip over it?
Just curious. If so, how is it? I was wondering why the price of gas has
been skyrocketing in Louisiana lately. Guess they have to cover their
payments to you.LOL Joe Superior Wireless New Orleans,La.
www.superior1.com
- Original Message -
From: JohnnyO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 8:13 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


 We've installed 9 Wild Blue systems so far here in South Louisiana / 
 Mississippi / Alabama / Texas areas and have had great success with 
 them. WildBlue will be sending up another bird soon to increase 
 capacity and add features. Compared to all the other satellite systems

 we've dealt with, WildBlue hands down wins.

 JohnnyO

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 On Behalf Of Peter R.
 Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:44 PM
 To: WISPA General List
 Subject: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


 To fill in on rural gaps, ATT is selling Wildblue satellite internet 
 service under its own brand.

 [http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_hi_te/at_t_satellite_broadb
 an
 d_1]

 The company already has been trying fixed wireless broadband in 
 Alaska, Georgia and New Jersey. One of the technologies mentioned by 
 ATT as part of the trials is WiMax, which is similar to the Wi-Fi 
 technology that underlies Internet hot spots, but offers greater 
 range and speed. Posted by NSP Strategist to NSP Strategist 
 http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/05/att-reselling-wildblue.html at 
 5/08/2006 04:40:00 PM

 --


 Regards,

 Peter
 RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
 We Help ISPs Connect  Communicate
 813.963.5884
 http://4isps.com/newsletter.htm


 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

 --
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue

2006-05-08 Thread Travis Johnson




So all the accounts are setup under your name and then you just bill
the customer whatever price?

Do you know if they have a reseller option or any information about it?

Travis
Microserv

JohnnyO wrote:

  We're seeing 1.5mbps / 220kbps pretty consistently. We've been able to
run VPNs and terminal services over it reliably. Latency is consistent
around 500ms-700ms. Much better then DirecWay.

How much are we making off of it ? Well - Not much at all from the
"service" but we're selling an SLA to the oilfield companies that we
service with these systems. Our mark-up is approx 5x-7x what the monthly
service costs us but we'll have someone on-site within 6hours if
something goes south.

Not sure if you could use the same selling point we can, but oilfield
companies love to be catered to.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 8:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


Hey Johnny

Whats the speeds and latency up and down?
How much do you get to make on it?


Thanks
George

JohnnyO wrote:
  
  
We've installed 9 Wild Blue systems so far here in South Louisiana / 
Mississippi / Alabama / Texas areas and have had great success with 
them. WildBlue will be sending up another bird soon to increase 
capacity and add features. Compared to all the other satellite systems

  
  
  
  
we've dealt with, WildBlue hands down wins.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
On Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


To fill in on rural gaps, ATT is selling Wildblue satellite internet
service under its own brand.

[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_hi_te/at_t_satellite_broadb
an
d_1] 

The company already has been trying fixed wireless broadband in 
Alaska,
Georgia and New Jersey. One of the technologies mentioned by ATT as 
part of the trials is WiMax, which is similar to the Wi-Fi technology 
that underlies Internet "hot spots," but offers greater range and

  
  speed.
  
  
Posted by NSP Strategist to NSP Strategist 
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/05/att-reselling-wildblue.html at 
5/08/2006 04:40:00 PM


  
  
  



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue

2006-05-08 Thread JohnnyO
Title: Message



We 
don't bill the customer for "Internet Service" at all - We give the "access" 
away to them. WildBlue does have reseller / installer programs. What we charge 
is for a "response time" to handle their needs in the event something burns up / 
gets zapped / gets moved, etc.

JohnnyO

  
  -Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
  Travis JohnsonSent: Monday, May 08, 2006 8:58 PMTo: 
  WISPA General ListSubject: Re: [WISPA] ATT reselling 
  WildblueSo all the accounts are setup under your name and 
  then you just bill the customer whatever price?Do you know if they 
  have a reseller option or any information about 
  it?TravisMicroservJohnnyO wrote: 
  We're seeing 1.5mbps / 220kbps pretty consistently. We've been able to
run VPNs and terminal services over it reliably. Latency is consistent
around 500ms-700ms. Much better then DirecWay.

How much are we making off of it ? Well - Not much at all from the
"service" but we're selling an SLA to the oilfield companies that we
service with these systems. Our mark-up is approx 5x-7x what the monthly
service costs us but we'll have someone on-site within 6hours if
something goes south.

Not sure if you could use the same selling point we can, but oilfield
companies love to be catered to.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of George Rogato
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 8:18 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


Hey Johnny

Whats the speeds and latency up and down?
How much do you get to make on it?


Thanks
George

JohnnyO wrote:
  
We've installed 9 Wild Blue systems so far here in South Louisiana / 
Mississippi / Alabama / Texas areas and have had great success with 
them. WildBlue will be sending up another bird soon to increase 
capacity and add features. Compared to all the other satellite systems

  
we've dealt with, WildBlue hands down wins.

JohnnyO

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
On Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Monday, May 08, 2006 3:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] ATT reselling Wildblue


To fill in on rural gaps, ATT is selling Wildblue satellite internet
service under its own brand.

[http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060508/ap_on_hi_te/at_t_satellite_broadb
an
d_1] 

The company already has been trying fixed wireless broadband in 
Alaska,
Georgia and New Jersey. One of the technologies mentioned by ATT as 
part of the trials is WiMax, which is similar to the Wi-Fi technology 
that underlies Internet "hot spots," but offers greater range and
speed.
  
Posted by NSP Strategist to NSP Strategist 
http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/05/att-reselling-wildblue.html at 
5/08/2006 04:40:00 PM


  
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/