All,
I read this article and thought you might be interested.
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Startup Wants To Offer Free Nationwide Wireless
M2Z Networks says it wants to provide near ubiquitous coverage at
speeds of about 384 Kbps for downloads in the 2.1 GHz spectrum band.
By David Haskin
If your looking for equipment manufacturers, you'll be looking at
companies like IPwireless, Flarion, etc... Typically $50-100K per base
station/sector deployment...
Jon Langeler
Michwave Tech.
Gino A. Villarini wrote:
Gino A. Villarini Hello,
The local government holds a license for 700
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Jon Langeler wrote:
If your looking for equipment manufacturers, you'll be looking at
companies like IPwireless, Flarion, etc... Typically $50-100K per
base station/sector deployment...
WaveIP and Airspan both have gear in the 700MHz band. WaveIP is
around $1500 for AP
Most of these muni projects are basing the 700 Mhz on the public safety band
that is not yet available. High speed roaming is the application not
broadband. I know the Wimax Forum is at least looking at the band for e
which fits the mold. Every public safety entity I have talked with in the
last 2
Read below and you can decide on whether or not you will be breaking the
law w/ a 3650 deployment
---
To: 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Cc: isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 6:32 AM
Subject: [equipment-l]
It's about dang time they got off the dime on this! Shoot, the rules are
already set.
Are you hearing anything about the impact of the petitions of
reconsideration?
thanks
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sales
(408) 907-6910 (Vonage)
So where is my danged wifi cpe that can keep a list of 36 ap's and is smart
enough to switch between them automatically?
sheesh I could have sold thousands of these over the 2 years since I've
asked for that product!
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment
http://www.telkonet.com/
Marlon(509)
982-2181
Equipment sales(408) 907-6910
(Vonage)
Consulting services42846865
(icq)
And I run my own wisp!64.146.146.12 (net meeting)www.odessaoffice.com/wirelesswww.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Smith
I understood that the 3650 was not to be used in commercial links. I'm
assuming money makes it commercial.
I would like to deploy a couple links for non paying situations, cameras
for a city park. I'd also like to have the licenseand not be wasting
my limited unlicensed spectrum.
Do you
http://www.wavionnetworks.com/tech/index.html
Fact or Fiction?
Target pricing?
RD stage or Live trials?
Seems as if they are taking advantage of the most
recent technology advancements not yet utilizedby many.
MIMO (Like Pre-N), Beam Forming (Like
Vivato),HIGH Power Rules (8extra DB for
http://www.wavionnetworks.com/tech/index.html
Fact or Fiction?
Target pricing?
RD stage or Live trials?
Seems as if they are taking advantage of the most recent technology
advancements not yet utilized by many.
MIMO (Like Pre-N), Beam Forming (Like Vivato), HIGH Power Rules (8 extra DB
for
George,
I think there is a lot of this sort of thing happening and I think
intentions are good, but, no, I do not think this meets the requirement.
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: George Rogato [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 12:59 PM
To: WISPA General List
Tom,
I'll try to answer some of your questions.
Q. Fact or Fiction?
A. MIMO does offer several significant advantages compared to non-MIMO.
The use of beamforming improves signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in both
directions thus increasing range and reliability. Being able to transmit
multiple
Jack,
Thanks for responding.
Q. High Power Rules?
A. Not as far as I know.
Yes, their gear does qualify for the recent FCC high power rules, allowing
it to transmit at 8 db higher. My understanding is their technology takes
advanatge of it.
Q. Any other questions?
A. Fill in questions
Actually, on the Ap Side Airspan is around 5000.00 and 400 or so for the
CPE.
-
Jeff
On Tue, 23 May 2006 08:43:29 -0500 (CDT), Butch Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, 23 May 2006, Jon Langeler wrote:
If your looking for equipment manufacturers, you'll be looking at
companies like
www.airmatrix.com
On Tue, 23 May 2006 09:25:51 -0700, Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So where is my danged wifi cpe that can keep a list of 36 ap's and is
smart
enough to switch between them automatically?
sheesh I could have sold thousands of these over the
sure.
On Tue, 23 May 2006 12:58:34 -0700, George Rogato
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I understood that the 3650 was not to be used in commercial links. I'm
assuming money makes it commercial.
I would like to deploy a couple links for non paying situations, cameras
for a city park. I'd also like
jeffrey thomas wrote:
sure.
Hi Jeff, so sure is your answer, and no is Patricks.
You got something different than Patrick that says a wisp can set up a
link and put it into production 24/7?
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
Will the 3650 be WIMAX'able. I understand that the 3650 is supposed to
be contention based and WIMAX is not contention based.
Any updates?
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives:
Patrick,
It doesnt change the fact that many have launched limited deployments
as a test but still charged for the access service, banking on the
fact that the FCC has set the band aside for unlicensed anyways, and
that the chance of the FCC cracking down on them is very low.
Im not saying this
Tom,
Please see my answers inline.
jack
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Jack,
Thanks for responding.
Q. High Power Rules?
A. Not as far as I know.
Yes, their gear does qualify for the recent FCC high power rules,
allowing it to transmit at 8 db higher. My understanding is their
technology takes
Towerstream anyone ?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 6:56 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject:
Gino,
Is Towerstream doing this - using 3650 to deliver commercial service?
jack
Gino A. Villarini wrote:
Towerstream anyone ?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
They currently hold 13 Experimental Licenses for 3.65 - 3.7 and 5.4-5.725
Check them out yourself and make you own conclusions
https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/cf/els/reports/GenericSearchResult.cfm?Re
questTimeout=500
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel
Gino,
They may need that many to test the full throughput capabilities. So
what are the details of what they are doing?
jack
Gino A. Villarini wrote:
Do you really think towerstream need 150 field units or cpes to test a
single base station?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet
They don't even have 150 customers in some markets!
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Unger
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:43 PM
Jack,
The same would probably apply to the hundreds of WISP's who operate
systems that break the part-15 rules regarding power output. While
it is illegal, I currently am unaware of any operators who have recieved
fines or anything of the sort for such behavior but it happens. Do I
encourage
Wow, I think I heard a bell ring somewhere.
-
Jeff
On Tue, 23 May 2006 20:58:32 -0400, Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Towerstream anyone ?
Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
In the larger scale of things- when you compare this to a carrier
deployment which would deliver thousands of CPE's service, this is a
test. I know of one company that has recieved 28 STA's for 14 markets,
for over 2000 CPE.
-
Jeff
On Tue, 23 May 2006 21:33:33 -0400, Gino A. Villarini
[EMAIL
Jeffrey,
I agree that WISPs should not exceed the 4-watt access point power
limit. I think you're correct that out of the 5000 or so WISPs probably
20% exceed the power limit. I'd estimate that of those 20% probably 75%
of them don't know how to calculate the power limit and 5% exceed the
30 matches
Mail list logo
