Re: [WISPA] MT power supplies THE SOLUTION

2006-09-16 Thread Brian Rohrbacher
Couldn't find it.  Under cable settings is default, standard, and 
short.  From the manual it looks like default = long cable and it 
looks like default is the default.

But I have no idea how to see what mode it is on.

Brian

Rick Smith wrote:


Brian, did you try the long cable setting on that particular
interface ?

Brian Rohrbacher wrote:

I started with   RB 532 on tower.  It comes down 265 feet to 
poe injector to router.  Major packet loss.

2)  switched RB 532 out.  No change.
3)  Created test setup on ground with bad board and it looked fine. 
(from laptop--6ft cablepoe265 ft---RB)

4) Blamed it on the cable, and got a cable certifier from a friend.
5)  Right before climb, I re did the test setup on the ground.  This 
time I plugged the 265 feet into the actual router instead of my 
laptop.  The problen was back.  (I was bummed)
6)  One final test.  Get another 265 foot cable.  I used 265ft for 
power and 265ft for data to eth 2 or 3. Problem solved. I can only 
speculate that the chipset on RB 532 poe port is diffrent from the 
chipset on eth 2/3.
And for whatever reason it was not compatable with cable, hardware, 
ect.setup.
I may never know for sure why, but I have the workaround.  Good 
enough for me.


FWIW  I ended up pulling 2 new cables (all 3 certified fine).  I used 
the original cable for data (it has real shield)  I used my new 2 
(cheapo foil shield) for power and slapped the other into eth3 for 
the heck of it.


Lessons learned for next time. Measure cable, crimp, and power up on 
ground using the EXACT same everything as what the final deployment 
will have.  And then test.


Hope that sums it all up.

Ok to directly answer your question.  Yes.  I did this on the ground 
test unit.


Brian
Rohrbacher

Paul Hendry wrote:


Brian,

Just out of interest, did you try running both power and data over 
the new

cable and did you still see the same issue?

P.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: 15 September 2006 02:43
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT power supplies THE SOLUTION

First off.  I'm back to a 48v 420mA power supply.
To the solution.
I ran another cat5 up the tower and plugged it into the RB 532.
Now I have one cable for poe and one cable for data, and it all 
works fine.

And check this.  My headache went away as soon as the problem did.  :)
Problem solved.  NEXT!

Brian

Tom DeReggi wrote:

 

Amps don't mean a thing without disclosing Volts, Consider Watts 
instead. 1300mA at 3V is much different than 1300mA at 18V.
The mPCI slot (SR5) is 3.3V.   Power to the Motherboard is from 
12-48V. W=V*A


Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL  Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


- Original Message - From: Mark McElvy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 8:19 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] MT power supplies


I am surprised no one has mentioned this. I looked up power 
consumption
on the SR5 and it shows 800 to 1300 mA each. You state your power 
supply
is 700mA. I did not look up power consumption for the RB532 but I 
would

think you would need at least a 3A supply.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Behalf Of Brian Rohrbacher
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:51 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT power supplies

So, does anyone know if it looks like I would be fine on the power 
side

of things?
I have tweaked the ethernet port settings for no gain.

Next step is to get climbing 280ft to replace board, but I'd like to
confirm power first.

Brian

Brian Rohrbacher wrote:

 


I have a RB 532 on 300 foot of cat 5 with 2 sr5.
I'm using poe 48v .700a power supply.
I'm seeing weirdness.

Do I have enough juice

Brian



  



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] U.S. Senate Approves Wireless Emergency Alert System

2006-09-16 Thread Dawn DiPietro

U.S. Senate Approves Wireless Emergency Alert System
Sep 15, 2006 News Release

The Senate on Tuesday adopted a wireless emergency alert system as part 
of a larger comprehensive port security bill it is debating. The Senate 
included language from a Commerce Committee approved bill to establish 
the Warning, Alert, and Response Network (WARN). WARN is a national 
system for the transmission of public safety alerts across a broad 
variety of communications technologies including wireless technologies.


The Senate action essentially moves the Emergency Alert System out of 
the era of broadcast radio and television and into the wireless era, 
according to a release from the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science 
and Transportation. In addition to the threat posed by terrorist 
attacks, the system created by this amendment will give emergency 
managers the ability to alert communities of other hazards such as 
natural disasters and manmade accidents.


With hurricane season upon us, we are reminded of how critical the WARN 
system is to help ensure that we are prepared for busy storm seasons, 
said Commerce Chairman Stevens. Considering the National Hurricane 
Center's continued predictions, we cannot afford to wait any longer. The 
United States could be hit with major hurricanes again this year, and 
the House must act swiftly to implement this important warning system.


The amendment approved ensures that when disaster strikes, the wireless 
network will be able to be used as a tool so that almost all Americans 
will be notified through radio, television and wireless communications 
devices. There are over 200 million wireless subscribers in the United 
States. Additionally capabilities will allow other emergency managers to 
reach individuals away from their TVs or radios with specific life 
saving instructions.


http://www.govtech.net/localgovt/story.php?id=101035
---
---

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/