[WISPA] Japan ranks top in number of 2005 mobile broadband Internet users

2006-12-04 Thread Dawn DiPietro
04.12.2006 / 08:06 Japan ranks top in number of 2005 mobile broadband 
Internet users
GENEVA. December 4, 2006. KAZINFORM - Japan ranked top in terms of the 
number of users of broadband Internet services via mobile phone in 2005, 
a U. N. telecom body said Sunday.


The number of mobile broadband Internet service subscribers totaled 17. 
79 million in Japan in 2005, followed by 12. 53 million in South Korea 
and 10. 26 million in Italy, the Geneva-based International 
Telecommunication Union said in an annual report on Internet services.


The total number of subscribers around the world came to 60. 25 million.

The number of worldwide fixed broadband Internet subscribers totaled 
215. 48 million in 2005.


The United States topped this category with 49. 39 million, followed by 
37. 5 million in China and 22. 37 million in Japan.


The ITU also said the number of global mobile phone subscribers jumped 
to 2,168.


43 million in 2005 from 740. 02 million in 2000.

Cellphones are rapidly spreading in developing countries as the costs 
for establishing networks for the services are less than those for 
fixed-line telephones, Kazinform refers to Kyodo.


http://www.inform.kz/showarticle.php?lang=engid=146572
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Fiber Supplier

2006-12-04 Thread Scott Reed
I have the opportunity to bid a inside fiber installation. I have a 
supplier of fiber, but am looking for another one or two for competitive 
bids.  Any recommendations for who to contact for about 6000' of 
multimode 50um fiber, 12 strand?

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] 900 Mhz Mikrotik SR9 Clients

2006-12-04 Thread Marlon K. Schafer


- Original Message - 
From: Butch Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 900 Mhz Mikrotik SR9 Clients



On Sun, 3 Dec 2006, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:

How many ip addys does each customer need in a fully routed network? 
gateway, ip and broadcast.  I see that as three.  Or does a /30 use up 
four?


The customer will still use 1.


What about the gateway and broadcast addresses?  Yeah, the customer only 
uses one, but it takes more than one to provide that.


Can we use a /24 gateway ip for /30 routes?




Either way, by bridging each customer only needs one.


your customers don't have a gateway?  The only difference in routing and 
bridging as far as this is concerned, is where the gateway IP resides.


I think you're missunderstanding what I'm trying to say.  If we did a 
network of /30 addresses how many customers can be put on a class c (256 
addresses)?


If we just bridge that same class C how many customers can we put on it?



The benefits that come with routing to each customer can be made up for by 
using a router and/or firewall at each cpe and by blocking client to 
client communications.  Both this and routing result in the same thing eh? 
Customers don't mess with the other customers or the network.


Controlling client to client comms on a single AP will only limit access 
to other clients of the same AP...It will not prevent customer a on AP1 
from communicating with customer a on AP2.


That's where the vlan switches come in.  They'll prevent that from 
happening.




--
Butch Evans
Network Engineering and Security Consulting
573-276-2879
http://www.butchevans.com/
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
(http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html)
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Effect of Snow on 900

2006-12-04 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
I put in a customer's CPE just as the snow season started at my customer's
house in the mountains.   They had around 2 inches of snow on the ground,
and of course, some clung to the trees.

They were gone for Thanksgiving weekend, and when they got back, it was a
few days before I could get back to finish up inside.

When I left, we had a nice solid link, though it went through quite a few
trees right by the client end, at a total distance of about three miles, but
the sky visible through the trees we had to run through.

When I got back yesterday, we can't even see the AP on a site survey.

The only difference is that now there's maybe a food of snow and of  course,
somewhat more stuck to the trees.

Client and AP are both WAR boards with SR9's and 9 db yagi's.

Does snow block 900 that effectively?   Our testing showed earlier that in
town, you can get a weak signal with a site survey even standing on the
ground, through a mile or more of houses, trees, etc.We tried re-aiming,
but nothing.

Did I have something else go wrong, or does snow clinging to a few branches
totally wipe out an additional 15 or more db of RSSI?




+++
neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington
email me at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Matt Liotta
One the biggest factors holding our industry back is a lack of success 
on the part of the big poster children. People look at the past failures 
of WinStar and Teligent and wonder if new entrants can succeed. Many 
investors are watching FiberTower and NextLink to see if these new 
poster children can prove the business model.


It doesn't really matter that neither FiberTower or NextLink are 
representative of our industry. What matters is they are both publicly 
traded fixed wireless companies. This means that all fixed wireless 
companies are viewed through the lens of these publicly traded companies 
since they are the only ones with enough information for people to draw 
conclusions on.


If you look at FiberTower's and NextLink's latest numbers you should be 
very worried. NextLink is failing and I predict will be out of business 
in the not too distant future. FiberTower is much better off than 
NextLink, but they are burning cash at an impressive rate. One can 
easily predict them running out of cash sometime next year if things 
follow a similar trend.


Some of us on this list do more revenue than NextLink, but I doubt that 
will matter when they go under. Our valuations will decline in lock step 
to any failures by these two companies.


-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Peter R.
The one thing that has been the failure of SO many companies including 
NextLink, Yipes, et al - NOT ENOUGH SALES.  Folks in the greater ISP 
industry tend to focus much of their attention on the technology. 
Building, tinkering, tweaking.  Equally, your focus has to be on sales  
marketing. 

It's the end of another year  
(http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/12/eoy-part-ii.html), take time to 
make goals for the new year - and to create a sales plan for your 
company and a marketing plan.  (Even if you don't follow it, at least 
you have taken the time to think about it).


Marketing for WISP's:   
http://www.isp-planet.com/marketing/2006/ispcon_wireless_marketing.html


Here's a couple of things about low hanging fruit: easy to pick - by you 
or anyone else; and if not picked, it gets rotten and falls off the tree.


To your success,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc.
Marketing IDEA guy.com
(813) 963-5884

I take the technology and help you turn it into revenue.


Matt Liotta wrote:

One the biggest factors holding our industry back is a lack of success 
on the part of the big poster children. People look at the past 
failures of WinStar and Teligent and wonder if new entrants can 
succeed. Many investors are watching FiberTower and NextLink to see if 
these new poster children can prove the business model.


It doesn't really matter that neither FiberTower or NextLink are 
representative of our industry. What matters is they are both publicly 
traded fixed wireless companies. This means that all fixed wireless 
companies are viewed through the lens of these publicly traded 
companies since they are the only ones with enough information for 
people to draw conclusions on.


If you look at FiberTower's and NextLink's latest numbers you should 
be very worried. NextLink is failing and I predict will be out of 
business in the not too distant future. FiberTower is much better off 
than NextLink, but they are burning cash at an impressive rate. One 
can easily predict them running out of cash sometime next year if 
things follow a similar trend.


Some of us on this list do more revenue than NextLink, but I doubt 
that will matter when they go under. Our valuations will decline in 
lock step to any failures by these two companies.


-Matt




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Fiber Supplier

2006-12-04 Thread Patrick Leary
In that type environment you have several product choices, but I'd
probably just spec in an OSP-rated PE (polyethylene) sheathed fiber with
tight buffered strands since you'll be putting in conduit and will thus
have a clean run with string. OCC (Optical Cable Corporation) out of
Salem, VA would be a decent choice in terms of both functionality and
cost. It has Kevlar for tensile strength. Just use a kellums grip and
make sure the pull line is tied to the Kevlar. 

An ATT loose-tube will have less friction in the pull and is a good
choice for runs along existing cables. As a loose-tube (gel) cable with
fiberglass strength members. It is springy so it can be pushed as much
as pulled. Loose tube takes longer to terminate and requires higher
expertise as it takes a bit more care.

There is a brand called Chromatic Technologies that is low cost, but I
never liked working with it.

Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 10:15 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Fiber Supplier

Thanks Patrick,
I know how to do a lot of it, contract it.  I know folks that do the 
labor part, but I am to supply the material.  In the past someone else 
did it, so I am looking for vendors.

Manufacturing facility.  Total of 6000',  Longest run about 2500.  Lots 
of pull boxes, few bends, just because of the plant layout.   The 
building is over 2800' long, 600' wide.

Patrick Leary wrote:
 Anixter, CSC Supply, Anicom (still around?), Graybar...these are
(were)
 common suppliers in my day. You need to know what type of inside
fiber
 though. Plenum? Non-plenum? What type of non-plenum? Will it require
 innerduct (also plenum or non-plenum)? Conduit (EMT, rigid, etc.?).
 Conduit construction for fiber is different than for electrical. For
 example, you use sweeps instead of elbows and you'd need to install
pull
 boxes after every two 90's. (At each pull box you should coil some
slack
 too.)

 Chris, do you know what you are doing? If not, don't bid it. Screw it
up
 and it will cost you big time. Fiber is tough from a tensile
 perspective, but you have to know how to pull and bend it. 

 Is this one long run? That's over a mile. If that is the case and this
 is all inside then you are doing some massive warehouse and/or plant
 facility. If that's the case you likely have conduit issues, among
many,
 many other thing.

 Also, I am assuming you do know how to terminate and test it?

 I could list tons of questions but I don't know what your skill set
is.
 But a simple sourcing question does not give warm and fuzzy that you
 know what you are doing, so you need to be careful.



 Patrick Leary
 AVP WISP Markets
 Alvarion, Inc.
 o: 650.314.2628
 c: 760.580.0080
 Vonage: 650.641.1243
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
 Behalf Of Scott Reed
 Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 6:12 AM
 To: wireless@wispa.org
 Subject: [WISPA] Fiber Supplier

 I have the opportunity to bid a inside fiber installation. I have a 
 supplier of fiber, but am looking for another one or two for
competitive

 bids.  Any recommendations for who to contact for about 6000' of 
 multimode 50um fiber, 12 strand?
   
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses(190).







 
 


This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals 
computer viruses(42).











This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer 
viruses.




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Biz Dev Proposal

2006-12-04 Thread Robert Kim Wireless Internet Advisor

Marlon, Brad, I can send wispa business.

Personally, I'm a google marketing guy. most of our business comes
from google...
under a search for evdo

according to adwords.google.com traffic estimator,

under the terms,

wimax
and
wireless internet

you'd get 1800 visitors and 19000 visitors respectively. only a
fraction of these visitors are right for my company. the rest are
better fits for you wisp owners.

So... help me send biz your way.
1. use http://wimax-coverage.com to post news and press releases about
your company
include:
address (people search for city names)
url to your website
relevant sales teasers

2. link to http://evdo-coverage.com using code:
a href=http://evdo-coverage.com;wireless internet/a

we are #11 in google under wireless internet

when we hit  #4, our traffic will increase 40X and I'll post a large
banner for the wisp map where you've already posted your service
areas... http://map.wirelessinternetcoverage.com/

thoughts?
questions?


On 12/4/06, Brad Belton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

This only adds more fuel to the argument that simply placing a multiple on a
company isn't where the smart money is.

Revenue is largely irrelevant.  Profits are King.  Revenue doesn't put kids
through school or buy that new car...bottom line profit does.

The concept of fixed wireless has long lost its sizzle.  Simply stating
you're able to cut out the LEC and reap those dollars yourself doesn't
excite like it used to.  Profits, real estate assets, contractual
agreements, client base are key deal points in today's market.

While I agree WinStar and Teligent didn't do the fixed wireless industry any
favors, most of the bridges burned were with building management and not the
end user market.  Investor relationships may have also taken a toll, but
again the smart money isn't going to get all wrapped up in the sizzle.
They will be looking for real assets and real earnings.

Best,


Brad




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 11:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Industry failings

One the biggest factors holding our industry back is a lack of success
on the part of the big poster children. People look at the past failures
of WinStar and Teligent and wonder if new entrants can succeed. Many
investors are watching FiberTower and NextLink to see if these new
poster children can prove the business model.

It doesn't really matter that neither FiberTower or NextLink are
representative of our industry. What matters is they are both publicly
traded fixed wireless companies. This means that all fixed wireless
companies are viewed through the lens of these publicly traded companies
since they are the only ones with enough information for people to draw
conclusions on.

If you look at FiberTower's and NextLink's latest numbers you should be
very worried. NextLink is failing and I predict will be out of business
in the not too distant future. FiberTower is much better off than
NextLink, but they are burning cash at an impressive rate. One can
easily predict them running out of cash sometime next year if things
follow a similar trend.

Some of us on this list do more revenue than NextLink, but I doubt that
will matter when they go under. Our valuations will decline in lock step
to any failures by these two companies.

-Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




--
Robert Q Kim, Internet Advisor Provider
http://iptv-coverage.com
http://evdo-coverage.com
2611 S. Pacific Coast Highway 101
Suite 203
Cardiff by the Sea, CA 92007
206 984 0880
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Fiber Supplier

2006-12-04 Thread Blake Bowers

You may want to contact Bruce at Lattice Business Solutions,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bruce handles all my surplus gear, shelters, gensets, etc, and has
been really good to deal with.  He knows the industry.




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On

Behalf Of Scott Reed
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 6:12 AM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] Fiber Supplier

I have the opportunity to bid a inside fiber installation. I have a 
supplier of fiber, but am looking for another one or two for

competitive


bids.  Any recommendations for who to contact for about 6000' of 
multimode 50um fiber, 12 strand?
  

--


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Fiber Supplier

2006-12-04 Thread Mario Pommier
/Dan The Cable Man Oberholtzer at Elepro.com has always been a very 
good source of fiber for me.

26601 - 79th Ave South
Kent, WA 98032
Phone: 800-423-0646
Fax: 253-859-9101
http://elepro.com/

Mario//
/
Scott Reed wrote:

I have the opportunity to bid a inside fiber installation. I have a 
supplier of fiber, but am looking for another one or two for 
competitive bids.  Any recommendations for who to contact for about 
6000' of multimode 50um fiber, 12 strand?


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] public saftey net.

2006-12-04 Thread Jack Unger

Chris,

AFAIK, no - they are not required to use 4.9 GHz exclusively. Although 
reguirements will vary depending on the group's needs and the 
recommendations of their techical people, there is no regulation that I 
know of that would prevent them from using the license-free frequency 
bands where they deem it appropriate. Other folks on this list may have 
other, more-specific information.


jack


chris cooper wrote:


If a first responder organization succeeds in getting homeland security
funding, are they required to build an entirely 4.9 network?  The folks
I have talked with have this vision of having interconnected 4.9
networks that all first responders can connect to and that these
networks will at some point be linked on at least a regional basis, all
on 4.9 so that all can communicate together.  The problem is, terrain
and penetration severely limit usefulness of 4.9 Aps.  Are they
permitted to build hybrid 900/4.9 networks?

 


Thanks

Chris



--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Serving the License-Free Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs
True Vendor-Neutral WISP Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
Newsletters Downloadable from http://ask-wi.com/newsletters.html
Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220  www.ask-wi.com



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Dustin Jurman
Matt can you send some links for those sources.

Dustin

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Industry failings

One the biggest factors holding our industry back is a lack of success 
on the part of the big poster children. People look at the past failures 
of WinStar and Teligent and wonder if new entrants can succeed. Many 
investors are watching FiberTower and NextLink to see if these new 
poster children can prove the business model.

It doesn't really matter that neither FiberTower or NextLink are 
representative of our industry. What matters is they are both publicly 
traded fixed wireless companies. This means that all fixed wireless 
companies are viewed through the lens of these publicly traded companies 
since they are the only ones with enough information for people to draw 
conclusions on.

If you look at FiberTower's and NextLink's latest numbers you should be 
very worried. NextLink is failing and I predict will be out of business 
in the not too distant future. FiberTower is much better off than 
NextLink, but they are burning cash at an impressive rate. One can 
easily predict them running out of cash sometime next year if things 
follow a similar trend.

Some of us on this list do more revenue than NextLink, but I doubt that 
will matter when they go under. Our valuations will decline in lock step 
to any failures by these two companies.

-Matt
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/











-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Blake Bowers

Wow.

Do you have any factual basis for those statements,
or are you just hoping?  Does customers that
send lots of jobs and money translate in any way
to a net loss of 14.5 million in the third quarter of
2006, as opposed to a 4.9 million dollar loss in
same quarter 2005?

It is kind of scary when a company in that shape
sees their general and admin costs go up 354%
in that period, when the actual costs of providing
that service go up only around 105%.

Now, with that said, it is a good concept.  The only
issue is whether or not Wall Street will let them
hang around burning money until they start showing
a profit.




- Original Message - 
From: Dustin Jurman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 'WISPA General List' wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 3:13 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Industry failings



Fiber Tower is rocking the house.  They are very focused and have a core
nitch of customers that not only love their service but are willing to 
send

lots of jobs and money to them.  Oh.. And they are executing like white on
rice.

Dustin Jurman

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Peter R.
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 1:54 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

The one thing that has been the failure of SO many companies including
NextLink, Yipes, et al - NOT ENOUGH SALES.  Folks in the greater ISP
industry tend to focus much of their attention on the technology.
Building, tinkering, tweaking.  Equally, your focus has to be on sales 
marketing.

It's the end of another year
(http://radinfo.blogspot.com/2006/12/eoy-part-ii.html), take time to
make goals for the new year - and to create a sales plan for your
company and a marketing plan.  (Even if you don't follow it, at least
you have taken the time to think about it).

Marketing for WISP's:
http://www.isp-planet.com/marketing/2006/ispcon_wireless_marketing.html

Here's a couple of things about low hanging fruit: easy to pick - by you
or anyone else; and if not picked, it gets rotten and falls off the tree.

To your success,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc.
Marketing IDEA guy.com
(813) 963-5884

I take the technology and help you turn it into revenue.


Matt Liotta wrote:


One the biggest factors holding our industry back is a lack of success
on the part of the big poster children. People look at the past
failures of WinStar and Teligent and wonder if new entrants can
succeed. Many investors are watching FiberTower and NextLink to see if
these new poster children can prove the business model.

It doesn't really matter that neither FiberTower or NextLink are
representative of our industry. What matters is they are both publicly
traded fixed wireless companies. This means that all fixed wireless
companies are viewed through the lens of these publicly traded
companies since they are the only ones with enough information for
people to draw conclusions on.

If you look at FiberTower's and NextLink's latest numbers you should
be very worried. NextLink is failing and I predict will be out of
business in the not too distant future. FiberTower is much better off
than NextLink, but they are burning cash at an impressive rate. One
can easily predict them running out of cash sometime next year if
things follow a similar trend.

Some of us on this list do more revenue than NextLink, but I doubt
that will matter when they go under. Our valuations will decline in
lock step to any failures by these two companies.

-Matt




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/











--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Matt Liotta

Dustin Jurman wrote:

Fiber Tower is rocking the house.  They are very focused and have a core
nitch of customers that not only love their service but are willing to send
lots of jobs and money to them.  Oh.. And they are executing like white on
rice. 

  
Are you joking? A quick read of their financials shows they are in a bad 
way and getting worse. Further, more than 65% of their revenue comes 
from two customers, one of which is ATT Wireless (now Cingular). At 
least in BellSouth regions, most of the Cingular sites are being 
backhauled with fiber and they are getting rid of the ATT equipment. 
How much future revenue will they get from Cingular especially if the 
ATT merger goes through?


-Matt

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Matt Liotta

Dustin Jurman wrote:

Matt can you send some links for those sources.
  

http://www.fibertower.com/investors-earnings-releases.shtml

-Matt

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] IkarusOS

2006-12-04 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
I have a few clients using Ikarus...

They seem to work ok.

Some stuff just doesn't work.  I have a couple boxes that seem to have
inoperable bandwidth controls or DHCP server.

It's probably configuration, but I can't for the life of me figure it out.
It appears to be exactly the same as the ones that do work.

Odd stuff just happens.   A client goes down, and a power cycle may not
fix it.   It might take 5 and then suddenly it works again.

You're configuring a board and it just suddenly seems to vanish off your
network.   It might come back.   It might not.   Eventually power cycles
will get you back.   Maybe 1, maybe 10.

Out of fairness to the folks at Antcor, I have ONLY used the Compex WP54
version, not any of the X86 or others, and it's the least popularly used,
probalby the has had the least development and debugging.   There could be
issues with the Compex boards too, for all I know.

Oh, and I detest the configuration program.

They're moving quite rapidly, and I do expect sometime soon they'll have a
pretty serious contender, but of the version I have used...  It just seemed
not quite ready for the big time.




+++
neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington
email me at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net

- Original Message - 
From: cw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 12:15 PM
Subject: [WISPA] IkarusOS


 Anybody have experiences they care to share? - cw

 TerraNovaNet
 http://www.TerraNova.Net
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 305-453-4011
 Think globally. Act locally. Conserve resources.
 -- 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
For those of us in the Ma and Pa category, it wasn't too hard to see this
coming.

I've argued since the day I first dreamed of wireless broadband, that life's
lessons would serve me fine...

Find a way to meet the needs of your customers, in a way that benefits THEM
and you.   If you can't produce a better value than someone else, find a way
to do so.

In the end, all the arguments about building value or revenue or whatever
are mostly trivial.   If you don't have a reason to exist, and if you don't
have a plan to make money with reasonable assumptions, and the flexibility
to change with the times, you're as obsolete as the buggy whip.

I seriously doubt that anything besides the aquisition of a customer base
THAT WILL MAKE YOU PROFITABLE LONG TERM matters a whole lot.   Of course,
the implications of that are technical competence, competitive products, and
pricing and cost structures that are sane and reasonable.   I operate on the
assumption that my customer today will be my customer in 10 years and that
he expects as good of value from what I do in 10 years as what I deliver
now.




+++
neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington
email me at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net

- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:54 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Industry failings


 One the biggest factors holding our industry back is a lack of success
 on the part of the big poster children. People look at the past failures
 of WinStar and Teligent and wonder if new entrants can succeed. Many
 investors are watching FiberTower and NextLink to see if these new
 poster children can prove the business model.


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Blair Davis

Hear, hear!!

Mark Koskenmaki wrote:


For those of us in the Ma and Pa category, it wasn't too hard to see this
coming.

I've argued since the day I first dreamed of wireless broadband, that life's
lessons would serve me fine...

Find a way to meet the needs of your customers, in a way that benefits THEM
and you.   If you can't produce a better value than someone else, find a way
to do so.

In the end, all the arguments about building value or revenue or whatever
are mostly trivial.   If you don't have a reason to exist, and if you don't
have a plan to make money with reasonable assumptions, and the flexibility
to change with the times, you're as obsolete as the buggy whip.

I seriously doubt that anything besides the aquisition of a customer base
THAT WILL MAKE YOU PROFITABLE LONG TERM matters a whole lot.   Of course,
the implications of that are technical competence, competitive products, and
pricing and cost structures that are sane and reasonable.   I operate on the
assumption that my customer today will be my customer in 10 years and that
he expects as good of value from what I do in 10 years as what I deliver
now.




+++
neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington
email me at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net

- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:54 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Industry failings


 


One the biggest factors holding our industry back is a lack of success
on the part of the big poster children. People look at the past failures
of WinStar and Teligent and wonder if new entrants can succeed. Many
investors are watching FiberTower and NextLink to see if these new
poster children can prove the business model.

   



 



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Peter R.

Organic growth is difficult. Most growth is via acquisition.

You have to offer Value.
You have to have a Plan.
You have to Execute on said plan while offering value.

- Peter

Blair Davis wrote:


Hear, hear!!

Mark Koskenmaki wrote:

For those of us in the Ma and Pa category, it wasn't too hard to 
see this

coming.

I've argued since the day I first dreamed of wireless broadband, that 
life's

lessons would serve me fine...

Find a way to meet the needs of your customers, in a way that 
benefits THEM
and you.   If you can't produce a better value than someone else, 
find a way

to do so.

In the end, all the arguments about building value or revenue or 
whatever
are mostly trivial.   If you don't have a reason to exist, and if you 
don't
have a plan to make money with reasonable assumptions, and the 
flexibility

to change with the times, you're as obsolete as the buggy whip.

I seriously doubt that anything besides the aquisition of a customer 
base
THAT WILL MAKE YOU PROFITABLE LONG TERM matters a whole lot.   Of 
course,
the implications of that are technical competence, competitive 
products, and
pricing and cost structures that are sane and reasonable.   I operate 
on the
assumption that my customer today will be my customer in 10 years and 
that

he expects as good of value from what I do in 10 years as what I deliver
now.



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Mark Koskenmaki

I have no idea what you mean by organic growth in contrast to
acquisition.



+++
neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington
email me at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net

- Original Message - 
From: Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Industry failings


 Organic growth is difficult. Most growth is via acquisition.

 You have to offer Value.
 You have to have a Plan.
 You have to Execute on said plan while offering value.

 - Peter

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Brad Belton
Organic growth typically refers to internally funded growth without outside
investment.  I would imagine that vast majority of wISPs are experiencing
organic growth.

Best,

Brad


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Koskenmaki
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Industry failings


I have no idea what you mean by organic growth in contrast to
acquisition.



+++
neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington
email me at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net

- Original Message - 
From: Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Industry failings


 Organic growth is difficult. Most growth is via acquisition.

 You have to offer Value.
 You have to have a Plan.
 You have to Execute on said plan while offering value.

 - Peter

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Peter R.

Organic Growth means creating revenue through sales and marketing.

*Organic growth* is the rate of business /wiki/Business expansion 
through increasing output and sales as opposed to mergers 
/wiki/Merger, acquisitions /wiki/Acquisition and take-overs. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_growth


Regards,

Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
We Help ISPs Connect  Communicate
813.963.5884
http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Ken Chipps
Organic growth is growth that is generated by the company itself through its
own efforts, as opposed to buying the growth. For example, if you are the
first to offer wireless Internet service in an area that you setup using
your own capital, then you have grown organically. In contrast, if you go to
an area and buy an existing provider, you have grown through acquisition. In
most industries organic growth is financed by cash flow or limited debt,
whereas growth through acquisition requires higher debt loads or an equity
offering.

Ken Chipps

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Koskenmaki
Sent: Tuesday, December 05, 2006 12:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Industry failings


I have no idea what you mean by organic growth in contrast to
acquisition.



+++
neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington
email me at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net

- Original Message - 
From: Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 9:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Industry failings


 Organic growth is difficult. Most growth is via acquisition.

 You have to offer Value.
 You have to have a Plan.
 You have to Execute on said plan while offering value.

 - Peter

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Industry failings

2006-12-04 Thread Mark Koskenmaki
Ok, thanks

I'm 100% organic growth, here.

And self-funded, too.  

Call it bootstrap, if you like.



+++
neofast.net - fast internet for North East Oregon and South East Washington
email me at mark at neofast dot net
541-969-8200
Direct commercial inquiries to purchasing at neofast dot net

- Original Message - 
From: Peter R. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Industry failings


 Organic Growth means creating revenue through sales and marketing.
 
 *Organic growth* is the rate of business /wiki/Business expansion 
 through increasing output and sales as opposed to mergers 
 /wiki/Merger, acquisitions /wiki/Acquisition and take-overs. 
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_growth
 
 Regards,
 
 Peter Radizeski
 RAD-INFO, Inc. - NSP Strategist
 We Help ISPs Connect  Communicate
 813.963.5884
 http://www.marketingIDEAguy.com
 
 -- 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] OT: AlvarionCOMNET Web site is live - link

2006-12-04 Thread Patrick Leary
: http://comnet.alvarion.com/ . for those that have signed up. 

Patrick Leary
AVP WISP Markets
Alvarion, Inc.
o: 650.314.2628
c: 760.580.0080
Vonage: 650.641.1243
[EMAIL PROTECTED]








This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by
PineApp Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals  computer 
viruses.



--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/