Somewhere in the archives of this list, I posted a spreadsheet designed for
very high reliability in northern climates.
WRAP boards consume about 1A @12V.
That's 24AH per day.
Depending on your location, your WORST month's solar power capability will
range from minimal to around 4 hours
I could see it ptp George. But not omni to cpe...
Unless a guy is using 200mw or higher radio cards. In which case, you did
use an amp, it's just built into the radio eh?
MY problem with high power radios is that they don't add any rec. gain like
an external amp will.
We're switching out
It's not quite so easy to forklift out entire customer bases when there are
hundreds of cpe out there.
50 of them? Paying top dollar? No problem.
A hobby wisp, that's not expected to feed a problem. No problem.
There are some great new toys out there. We build our new wpops with as
many
4 watts (36dB) at the tower.
1 watt radio output no limit on antenna size for cpe.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: rabbtux rabbtux [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Sunday, February 04, 2007 9:02 PM
Subject: [WISPA] 802.11a power limits
Anyone know
great! I was designing my first 'A' ap, and wanted to design in a
special distant client/repeater and it wouldn't quite make it from the
client side w/36db, however, a 28db antenna, no problem. My AP design
will still have a couple db to spare.
Thanks
Marshall
On 2/5/07, Marlon K. Schafer
New tower could double wireless firm's business
Baltimore Business Journal
http://baltimore.bizjournals.com/baltimore/stories/2007/02/05/story13.html?t=printable
Southaven builds its own wireless network with city-owned
MagnoliaWave
Memphis Business
FCC Grants Available for Telehealth And Telemedicine
http://www.atsp.org/government/programs.asp?contentID=1895FullStory=.
Association of Telehealth Service Providers
The FCC has recently announced a two-year pilot program that would fund
up to 85% of the costs for the design, construction and
I won't join into the arguement of B versus G and Amp versus no amp, but I
will say
I got three links working last week, using Cloaking, that were not able to
be made work without Cloaking ability.
When I can make a software parameter change and go from bad link to good
link, thats
Would be a cool test if it didn't incorrectly report my 5 ms network to be a
295 ms network.
No substitute for basic FTP tests.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: George Rogato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List
Forgive my ignorance, but is this 'cloaking' you speak of, a feature
of 802.11G, or is it exclusively starOS, or can I find in in Mikrotik
as well??
On 2/5/07, Tom DeReggi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I won't join into the arguement of B versus G and Amp versus no amp, but I
will say
I got
Our stategy has been to use high quality AP sector antennas with really good
F/B ratio. Cutting out noise is equivellent to adding gain.
Not that I'm against hipower cards, I'm just saying so many people forget
about F/B radio in their antenna choices and that Noise is accumulative from
360
If I put my money behind the bet I'd say the RFLinx amps would likely be
the winner. We've used their B/G OEM amp successfully. I do not have any
real specs to back that opinion up, as I rarely ever use an AMP on the AP
side, as it prevents using a high gain sector antenna based on FCC
'Cloaking' is the term used by the StarOS to refer to the functionality that
allows for changing channel width from 20Mhz to 10Mhz or 5Mhz.
According to
http://forum.mikrotik.com/viewtopic.php?p=30343sid=d1e41e16905346726003d1f2
b84d7ea2
Mikrotik also has this functionality as of version 2.9.12
This thread has changed off its original intent. In case anyone was
wondering why I started the thread
A top quality 18dbi Dual Polarity antenna enclosure (5.1G-5.8G) is about to
hit the market for a reasonable cost (near rootenna costs).
I was trying to get a feel for how popular they will
This would be great news for me if the medical community around me did
not have a policy against using wireless technology for data
communications. Gr
Scriv
Peter R. wrote:
FCC Grants Available for Telehealth And Telemedicine
Interesting.
I didn't know there was a such thing as a non-profit health care facility.
So am I understanding this correctly... They are funding a backbone network,
but for-profit health care subscibers (generally everyone) pay for access?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed
So what's the answer Lonnie?
Does Star OS cloaking do anything proprietary, or is it strictly unlocking
the Atheros's ability to utilize smaller channels, and likely able to work
with any wifi vendor that decides to unlock this Atheros feature?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet-
Who does this calea TTP besides Intelleq? How is Wispa coming on Calea?
Matt
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
www.subsentio.com is who we are working with.
I know verisign is doing it also.
Mike Bushard, Jr
Wisper Wireless Solutions, LLC
320-256-WISP (9477)
320-256-9478 Fax
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007
I am looking for some input from current Ceragon users. We are in a
position that we have to upgrade 4 backhaul links to a higher throughput
capacity. I have been looking at Ceragon for a while and know several folks
on list that have their ISP's reputation built on the performance of these
I have about 25 CPE90-15 radios that I would like to trade for 80-15
radios.
The 90-15s work fine, but seem to have some kind of issues with my
network at times that doesn't seem to affect the 80-15s, and my techs
don't like the user interface, so we decided to get them out of the loop.
maybe the free money will change their policies :-)
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: John Scrivner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2007 3:02 PM
The SPA942 is a great phone for the money (not quite as nice as the Polycom
501 which isn't much more $. Regardless of which you use, an Asterisk PBX
is the easiest and best solution for a system that size. Not only can
connect your SIP handsets and 4 analog sets, you can build an IAX or SIP
I just ordered an Alvarion B100 link that is supposed to match or exceed
those specs. It should be here tomorrow actually. We will be using it
for our first hop out which will carry all of our wireless network traffic.
There is a link on http://www.wispa.org to tell Alvarion to have a sales
I am afraid they will just build fiber business plans and not give
wireless a second thought. Why should they consider wireless if they can
get fiber for virtually free? Like I said...Gr.
Scriv
Tom DeReggi wrote:
maybe the free money will change their policies :-)
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL
WWW.TRIXBOX.ORG
IS WORHT A LOOK
Chuck Moses
HIGH DESERT WIRELESS BROADBAND COMMUNICATION
16922 Airport Blvd # 17
Mojave CA 93501
661 824 3431 office
818 406 6818 cell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Don Annas
Sent: Monday, February
You've HAD offers that have been refused...
Thanks,
Steve
On Jan 24, 2007, at Jan 24 07:10 PM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
WISPA has been working on this for a couple of years now.
Independently and with Cisco, New America, Media Access Project and
I've recently had talks with the
Patrick is correct - Flarion was working on 802.20 (full mobility
broadband) which, with the borging of Flarion by Qualcomm, has
essentially terminated.
Mobile Broadband standards work now seems to have shifted fully over
to 802.16e / Mobile WiMAX (which will be 100% licensed spectrum.)
Scriv:
Apologies for not responding sooner - I've been busy building new web
sites :-)
I don't want to make this into a commercial on the WISPA list, but
because you asked...
I'm back to writing full time about Broadband Wireless Internet
Access for a series of highly-focused web
Steve,
I appreciate your insight into the possibility that license-exempt white
space use might actually materialize. I very much hope that it does.
jack
Steve Stroh wrote:
Jack:
Consider...
To the television broadcasters, WISPs using this spectrum in a we'll
stay out of the way of
30 matches
Mail list logo
