I have a direct contact if anyone needs, But I just did the online form
and they called me a couple weeks later.
George
David E. Smith wrote:
On Tue, January 8, 2008 11:39 pm, Marlon Schafer wrote:
I sent in a request for info.
Depending on how big you are, you may be waiting a while for a
On Tue, January 8, 2008 11:39 pm, Marlon Schafer wrote:
> I sent in a request for info.
Depending on how big you are, you may be waiting a while for a response. A
few months back, I sent in a request for information from Akamai; two
months later, they replied with a very short, very curt "your ne
Thanks.
I sent in a request for info.
laters,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Anthony Lemons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai
Getting the Akamai servers installed on your network doesn't cost
anyth
George,
This is pretty simple to do, your colo provider might charge you a
nominal cross connect fee for the fiber you send to NWAX. However,
once you connect and your MAC address is registered, you can then
negotiate pretty decent deals with the other providers in the exchange.
All of th
Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote:
The key is to find out where people
are going (YouTube) and ensuring that they will help accelerate that.
Thats my thoughts. But, if NBC isn't paying Akamai, it won't be on their
servers.
I'm in the Pittock Building, wonder how easy it is to connect t
I have known several people to use these and some have seen bandwidth
savings. MS updates is one of them. Something to note, is that as
George says, it can go both ways. The key is to find out where people
are going (YouTube) and ensuring that they will help accelerate that.
George Rogato
There is possibly additional costs involved.
Not sure if Marlon is paying by the bit or dedicated or 95%, but Akamai
also uses your bandwidth to reach other customers close to you from the
servers they place on your network.
I think if someone was colocated in Seattle, they could maybe just p
Getting the Akamai servers installed on your network doesn't cost
anything. They ship you the equipment free of charge and you just
install it. More info can be found on their
site: http://www.akamai.com/html/partners/network_partner.html
Anthony
At 11:34 AM 1/8/2008, you wrote:
I'm thinking
I'm thinking of doing some kind of caching again too. What's the cost for
this type of thing? We only service about 450 or 500 broadband subs, using
two different networks. I'm not sure of the cost benefit these days.
thanks,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Travis Johnson" <[EMA
I would try to get between .6 and 1. If you expose the second zone then the
phase canceling starts and reduces your signal level.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:24 AM
So then should I be engineering my customer links to .6 Fresnel instead of
the > 1 that I've been trying to achieve?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Brian Webster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent
Thanks for the reference to that site. That will come in handy in the
future, no doubt.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 7:
Mike Hammett wrote:
I can't find any reference to their peering policies. I'd like to see
documentation on this, but I doubt that ANY ISP would be able to peer.
It wouldn't be economical for them to have everyone peered.
Are you referring to Google
(https://www.peeringdb.com/private/partici
13 matches
Mail list logo
