Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread Matt Liotta

Mike Hammett wrote:
I can't find any reference to their peering policies.  I'd like to see 
documentation on this, but I doubt that ANY ISP would be able to peer.  
It wouldn't be economical for them to have everyone peered.


Are you referring to Google 
(https://www.peeringdb.com/private/participant_view.php?id=433) or 
Akamai (https://www.peeringdb.com/private/participant_view.php?id=2)?


Akamai will peer with you. Google requires at least two locations.

-Matt



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread Mike Hammett
Thanks for the reference to that site.  That will come in handy in the 
future, no doubt.



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Matt Liotta [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 7:04 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai



Mike Hammett wrote:
I can't find any reference to their peering policies.  I'd like to see 
documentation on this, but I doubt that ANY ISP would be able to peer. 
It wouldn't be economical for them to have everyone peered.


Are you referring to Google 
(https://www.peeringdb.com/private/participant_view.php?id=433) or Akamai 
(https://www.peeringdb.com/private/participant_view.php?id=2)?


Akamai will peer with you. Google requires at least two locations.

-Matt



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Radio Mobile

2008-01-08 Thread Mike Hammett
So then should I be engineering my customer links to .6 Fresnel instead of 
the  1 that I've been trying to achieve?



-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message - 
From: Brian Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 8:26 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Radio Mobile



Mike,
As mentioned by another, try adjusting the height of one end or the other
to increase signal level. As Mac will tell you, higher on a site is not
always better. If you can engineer a path to obstruct as much of even 
number

Fresnel zones as possible it will help your signal level. Even and odd
number Fresnel zones cancel each other out. Using an obstruction to cover 
up
as many even number zones as possible gives some gain. This is why you 
hear

people say that you want to design a microwave backhaul with a .6 Fresnel
zone clearance. The danger in doing that with Radio Mobile, is the level 
of

detail in your terrain files. Radio Mobile is capable of using 10 meter
resolution terrain data from the USGS Seamless data distribution site (the
default that the program downloads from the internet is 30 meter), or if 
you
want, Roger (the Radio Mobile author) can create the data in SRTM format 
to

use in Radio Mobile http://www.lurodata.com/. While this gives excellent
terrain data details, it still does not show your clutter (trees,
buildings). Take a look at this site to see the differences in terrain 
data

http://www.sector14.net/~curt/ned/

You can do some visualization of clutter data in Radio Mobile at 1
kilometer resolution for free. If you download this file
http://www.geog.umd.edu/landcover/1km-map/UMD1km_L.zip you will have the
world clutter data at 1 KM resolution. This file can then be overlaid in
Radio Mobile as a map layer. It will not let you use it as part of a
prediction, but you can get an idea of the type of land cover to expect 
for
any given area. You can also use this file in conjunction with the RM 
Path

program in Radio Mobile to insert the clutter in your path profile
inspections. To do this you must first edit the landheight.dat file 
(using

notepad) in your Radio Mobile main directory. The numbers in this file
correspond to the color coded legend on a land cover map layer merge. Each
value is in meters and would be changed to represent the average clutter
heights for each clutter class in your area. Once this is complete you 
would
then do a path profile in Radio Mobile. In that window do a file export 
to
RMPath, chose the custom option and I like to use 1000 points in my 
export.

This will save a file (name it whatever you want or just overwrite the
default) and open the RM Path program window. In this path profile you 
will

see the terrain cross section with the clutter data layered on top. The
colors match what you would see as a merged layer on the map. At this 
point
you will NOT have a new signal level calculated based on clutter 
absorption,

but you will know what to expect for path blockages. You can also manually
edit the test file that was exported to insert any know obstructions in 
your

path. Keep in mind, this data is very general in that it paints a whole
square kilometer with the same class of clutter. Its not the best in the
world, but for free it gives you a lot more to look at before you do a 
truck

roll. This used in conjunction with Google Earth is just one more tool a
WISP can use.

I have been in the wireless industry for 18 years (including Senior RF
Engineering Manager at EarthLink). I currently have Planet, ICS Telecom by
ATDI and Radio Mobile as RF prediction tools. While Radio Mobile does not 
do
many of the advanced features I need to design PCS and Cellular networks, 
I

will attest that given the same data to start with, I can do predictions
that match or beat the expensive commercial tools when it comes to simple
field strength plots (which is what you want for coverage maps and path
studies). Where the commercial tools excel, is when I can get high
resolution clutter and building data. Radio Mobile simply does not have
these capabilities (although I work with the author on a regular basis to
improve Radio Mobile). I would highly recommend each WISP get one person 
on
their staff to become somewhat proficient in this software. It can save 
you

a lot of aggravation.



Thank You,
Brian Webster
www.wirelessmapping.com http://www.wirelessmapping.com


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, January 01, 2008 5:15 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Mobile


Right, the AP isn't directly at the client, but it says there's only 0.8 
db
of loss due to that.  It says I lose 7.4 dB due to obstruction (when I 
have

a 1.4 Fresnel zone) and 6.6 due to statistics.


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message -
From: Brian 

RE: [WISPA] Radio Mobile

2008-01-08 Thread Brian Webster
I would try to get between .6 and 1. If you expose the second zone then the
phase canceling starts and reduces your signal level.



Thank You,
Brian Webster

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 9:24 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Radio Mobile


So then should I be engineering my customer links to .6 Fresnel instead of
the  1 that I've been trying to achieve?


-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com


- Original Message -
From: Brian Webster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2008 8:26 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Radio Mobile


 Mike,
 As mentioned by another, try adjusting the height of one end or the other
 to increase signal level. As Mac will tell you, higher on a site is not
 always better. If you can engineer a path to obstruct as much of even
 number
 Fresnel zones as possible it will help your signal level. Even and odd
 number Fresnel zones cancel each other out. Using an obstruction to cover
 up
 as many even number zones as possible gives some gain. This is why you
 hear
 people say that you want to design a microwave backhaul with a .6 Fresnel
 zone clearance. The danger in doing that with Radio Mobile, is the level
 of
 detail in your terrain files. Radio Mobile is capable of using 10 meter
 resolution terrain data from the USGS Seamless data distribution site (the
 default that the program downloads from the internet is 30 meter), or if
 you
 want, Roger (the Radio Mobile author) can create the data in SRTM format
 to
 use in Radio Mobile http://www.lurodata.com/. While this gives excellent
 terrain data details, it still does not show your clutter (trees,
 buildings). Take a look at this site to see the differences in terrain
 data
 http://www.sector14.net/~curt/ned/

 You can do some visualization of clutter data in Radio Mobile at 1
 kilometer resolution for free. If you download this file
 http://www.geog.umd.edu/landcover/1km-map/UMD1km_L.zip you will have the
 world clutter data at 1 KM resolution. This file can then be overlaid in
 Radio Mobile as a map layer. It will not let you use it as part of a
 prediction, but you can get an idea of the type of land cover to expect
 for
 any given area. You can also use this file in conjunction with the RM
 Path
 program in Radio Mobile to insert the clutter in your path profile
 inspections. To do this you must first edit the landheight.dat file
 (using
 notepad) in your Radio Mobile main directory. The numbers in this file
 correspond to the color coded legend on a land cover map layer merge. Each
 value is in meters and would be changed to represent the average clutter
 heights for each clutter class in your area. Once this is complete you
 would
 then do a path profile in Radio Mobile. In that window do a file export
 to
 RMPath, chose the custom option and I like to use 1000 points in my
 export.
 This will save a file (name it whatever you want or just overwrite the
 default) and open the RM Path program window. In this path profile you
 will
 see the terrain cross section with the clutter data layered on top. The
 colors match what you would see as a merged layer on the map. At this
 point
 you will NOT have a new signal level calculated based on clutter
 absorption,
 but you will know what to expect for path blockages. You can also manually
 edit the test file that was exported to insert any know obstructions in
 your
 path. Keep in mind, this data is very general in that it paints a whole
 square kilometer with the same class of clutter. Its not the best in the
 world, but for free it gives you a lot more to look at before you do a
 truck
 roll. This used in conjunction with Google Earth is just one more tool a
 WISP can use.

 I have been in the wireless industry for 18 years (including Senior RF
 Engineering Manager at EarthLink). I currently have Planet, ICS Telecom by
 ATDI and Radio Mobile as RF prediction tools. While Radio Mobile does not
 do
 many of the advanced features I need to design PCS and Cellular networks,
 I
 will attest that given the same data to start with, I can do predictions
 that match or beat the expensive commercial tools when it comes to simple
 field strength plots (which is what you want for coverage maps and path
 studies). Where the commercial tools excel, is when I can get high
 resolution clutter and building data. Radio Mobile simply does not have
 these capabilities (although I work with the author on a regular basis to
 improve Radio Mobile). I would highly recommend each WISP get one person
 on
 their staff to become somewhat proficient in this software. It can save
 you
 a lot of aggravation.



 Thank You,
 Brian Webster
 www.wirelessmapping.com http://www.wirelessmapping.com


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Behalf Of Mike Hammett
 Sent: Tuesday, 

Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread Marlon Schafer
I'm thinking of doing some kind of caching again too.  What's the cost for 
this type of thing?  We only service about 450 or 500 broadband subs, using 
two different networks.  I'm not sure of the cost benefit these days.


thanks,
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai



We love Akamai... especially during big Windows Update periods. :)

We serve 12 school districts and they all seem to do their updates on PC's 
and servers during the same times (during school breaks) and the Akamai 
servers save us a ton of bandwidth and the customers get GREAT speeds 
doing the updates.


Travis
Microserv

George Rogato wrote:

Anybody have any experience with Akamai?

I'm thinking of adding some Akamai  servers to my network again, looking 
for opinions.


Thanks

George







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread Anthony Lemons
Getting the Akamai servers installed on your network doesn't cost 
anything. They ship you the equipment free of charge and you just 
install it. More info can be found on their 
site:  http://www.akamai.com/html/partners/network_partner.html


Anthony

At 11:34 AM 1/8/2008, you wrote:
I'm thinking of doing some kind of caching again too.  What's the 
cost for this type of thing?  We only service about 450 or 500 
broadband subs, using two different networks.  I'm not sure of the 
cost benefit these days.


thanks,
marlon

- Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai



We love Akamai... especially during big Windows Update periods. :)

We serve 12 school districts and they all seem to do their updates 
on PC's and servers during the same times (during school breaks) 
and the Akamai servers save us a ton of bandwidth and the customers 
get GREAT speeds doing the updates.


Travis
Microserv

George Rogato wrote:

Anybody have any experience with Akamai?

I'm thinking of adding some Akamai  servers to my network again, 
looking for opinions.


Thanks

George






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net
I have known several people to use these and some have seen bandwidth 
savings.  MS updates is one of them.  Something to note, is that as 
George says, it can go both ways.  The key is to find out where people 
are going (YouTube) and ensuring that they will help accelerate that. 


George Rogato wrote:

There is possibly additional costs involved.

Not sure if Marlon is paying by the bit or dedicated or 95%, but 
Akamai also uses your bandwidth to reach other customers close to you 
from the servers they place on your network.


I think if someone was colocated in Seattle, they could maybe just 
peer with them. One way to avoid some bandwidth costs.


Anthony Lemons wrote:
Getting the Akamai servers installed on your network doesn't cost 
anything. They ship you the equipment free of charge and you just 
install it. More info can be found on their site:  
http://www.akamai.com/html/partners/network_partner.html


Anthony

At 11:34 AM 1/8/2008, you wrote:
I'm thinking of doing some kind of caching again too.  What's the 
cost for this type of thing?  We only service about 450 or 500 
broadband subs, using two different networks.  I'm not sure of the 
cost benefit these days.


thanks,
marlon

- Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai



We love Akamai... especially during big Windows Update periods. :)

We serve 12 school districts and they all seem to do their updates 
on PC's and servers during the same times (during school breaks) 
and the Akamai servers save us a ton of bandwidth and the customers 
get GREAT speeds doing the updates.


Travis
Microserv

George Rogato wrote:

Anybody have any experience with Akamai?

I'm thinking of adding some Akamai  servers to my network again, 
looking for opinions.


Thanks

George





 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
 



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/







WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread George Rogato



Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote:
 The key is to find out where people

are going (YouTube) and ensuring that they will help accelerate that.


Thats my thoughts. But, if NBC isn't paying Akamai, it won't be on their 
servers.


I'm in the Pittock Building, wonder how easy it is to connect to akamai 
or google.


How does NWAX work?

https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=165

--
George Rogato

Welcome to WISPA

www.wispa.org

http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread George Rogato

There is possibly additional costs involved.

Not sure if Marlon is paying by the bit or dedicated or 95%, but Akamai 
also uses your bandwidth to reach other customers close to you from the 
servers they place on your network.


I think if someone was colocated in Seattle, they could maybe just peer 
with them. One way to avoid some bandwidth costs.


Anthony Lemons wrote:
Getting the Akamai servers installed on your network doesn't cost 
anything. They ship you the equipment free of charge and you just 
install it. More info can be found on their site:  
http://www.akamai.com/html/partners/network_partner.html


Anthony

At 11:34 AM 1/8/2008, you wrote:
I'm thinking of doing some kind of caching again too.  What's the cost 
for this type of thing?  We only service about 450 or 500 broadband 
subs, using two different networks.  I'm not sure of the cost benefit 
these days.


thanks,
marlon

- Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai



We love Akamai... especially during big Windows Update periods. :)

We serve 12 school districts and they all seem to do their updates on 
PC's and servers during the same times (during school breaks) and the 
Akamai servers save us a ton of bandwidth and the customers get GREAT 
speeds doing the updates.


Travis
Microserv

George Rogato wrote:

Anybody have any experience with Akamai?

I'm thinking of adding some Akamai  servers to my network again, 
looking for opinions.


Thanks

George





 


WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
 



WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
George Rogato

Welcome to WISPA

www.wispa.org

http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread D. Ryan Spott

George,

This is pretty simple to do, your colo provider might charge you a  
nominal cross connect fee for the fiber you send to NWAX. However,  
once you connect and your MAC address is registered, you can then  
negotiate pretty decent deals with the other providers in the exchange.


All of this without a loop charge.

ryan

http://www.nwax.net/member_information_connect.asp
http://www.nwax.net/about_faq.asp


On Jan 8, 2008, at 6:51 PM, George Rogato wrote:




Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net wrote:
The key is to find out where people

are going (YouTube) and ensuring that they will help accelerate that.


Thats my thoughts. But, if NBC isn't paying Akamai, it won't be on  
their servers.


I'm in the Pittock Building, wonder how easy it is to connect to  
akamai or google.


How does NWAX work?

https://www.peeringdb.com/private/exchange_view.php?id=165

--
George Rogato

Welcome to WISPA

www.wispa.org

http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread Marlon Schafer

Thanks.

I sent in a request for info.

laters,
marlon

- Original Message - 
From: Anthony Lemons [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai


Getting the Akamai servers installed on your network doesn't cost 
anything. They ship you the equipment free of charge and you just install 
it. More info can be found on their site: 
http://www.akamai.com/html/partners/network_partner.html


Anthony

At 11:34 AM 1/8/2008, you wrote:
I'm thinking of doing some kind of caching again too.  What's the cost for 
this type of thing?  We only service about 450 or 500 broadband subs, 
using two different networks.  I'm not sure of the cost benefit these 
days.


thanks,
marlon

- Original Message - From: Travis Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Saturday, January 05, 2008 9:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Akamai



We love Akamai... especially during big Windows Update periods. :)

We serve 12 school districts and they all seem to do their updates on 
PC's and servers during the same times (during school breaks) and the 
Akamai servers save us a ton of bandwidth and the customers get GREAT 
speeds doing the updates.


Travis
Microserv

George Rogato wrote:

Anybody have any experience with Akamai?

I'm thinking of adding some Akamai  servers to my network again, looking 
for opinions.


Thanks

George






WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread David E. Smith
On Tue, January 8, 2008 11:39 pm, Marlon Schafer wrote:

 I sent in a request for info.

Depending on how big you are, you may be waiting a while for a response. A
few months back, I sent in a request for information from Akamai; two
months later, they replied with a very short, very curt your network is
too small for us to bother with message.

Never hurts to ask, though. :)

David Smith
MVN.net





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Akamai

2008-01-08 Thread George Rogato
I have a direct contact if anyone needs, But I just did the online form 
and they called me a couple weeks later.


George

David E. Smith wrote:

On Tue, January 8, 2008 11:39 pm, Marlon Schafer wrote:


I sent in a request for info.


Depending on how big you are, you may be waiting a while for a response. A
few months back, I sent in a request for information from Akamai; two
months later, they replied with a very short, very curt your network is
too small for us to bother with message.

Never hurts to ask, though. :)

David Smith
MVN.net





WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org


Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
George Rogato

Welcome to WISPA

www.wispa.org

http://signup.wispa.org/



WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/


WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/