On Sat, 2008-12-13 at 15:59 -0500, Blair Davis wrote:
Since my core, back haul and AP's are MiktoTik, please tell me more!
How about a blog tutorial? :-)
http://blog.butchevans.com/
If you need clarification, by all means drop me an email or leave a
comment. I'll be happy to answer if there
Don't I remember that there was a lot of hype about interoperability?
That's why many of us still stick to the old a/b/g stuff. We hate the idea
of getting orphaned.
insert witty tagline here
- Original Message -
From: Drew Lentz d...@drewlentz.com
That seems awful cheap to me...I would expect at least $50k or more. A
200' self-supporting tower cost me about $65k and I did all of the leg
work.
If you have a tower crew, I would expect $15k for labor, $2000 for
earthwork, and I don't know the concrete requirements so maybe $1000,
$3000-5000
Hey Chris,
There are a pile of tower guys on the yahoo tower-pro list that are
looking for work. You might want to hit them up for a price.
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/Tower-pro/
Jim
chris cooper wrote:
Ok, pretty general question I know, but does anyone have a ball park
figure
A self supporting tower is more expensive to install sue to base requirements
and construction techniques. When I quoted installation pricing I was quoting
concrete and steel. I am not talking about zoning, fencing, shelters, or the
cost of lighting systems. The number I quoted is foundation
That was the reason I went with 802.11 on Tranzeo in the first place.
Yeah there are (insert 802.11 issues here) but at least I have the
freedom to shop around. I wish vendors would use ingenuity and value
rather than silly lock-ins to keep you.
ryan
(writing this on an OSX machine... I
Everyone praised WiMAX because it would be cross compatible. Welp, $10k AP
later, you're still stuck with a proprietary system, you just have less
money.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: Drew
rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
Don't I remember that there was a lot of hype about interoperability?
That's why many of us still stick to the old a/b/g stuff. We hate the idea
of getting orphaned.
Right on! Some of us HAVE been orphaned!
So this stuff then is not really WiMAX, it;s just another proprietary
system, right?
George
Blair Davis wrote:
rea...@muddyfrogwater.us wrote:
Don't I remember that there was a lot of hype about interoperability?
That's why many of us still stick to the old a/b/g stuff. We hate the idea
Well its uses Wimax MAC, but ists not Wimax Forum Certified so the
manufactures don't have to comply with interoperability
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
We are going to test this for ourselves but it is our understanding that all
3.65 WiMAX Forum Certified equipment is interoperable but only to a certain
extent. From what I understand, Redline Base Stations and Tranzeo CPE will
work together but only on a best effort basis. All QoS
It looks like we are saying the same thing, just differently...I said
foundation and tower construction would be roughly $17-20k. My
guestimate was for a turn-key, you provide the tower sections and when
it is complete, your antennas are in the air. I re-read his email and
it was only for tower
Honestly, it would seem the best solution at this time would be to use
the Vecima Base stations with Redline CPE. :)
Travis
Microserv
Jeff Ehman wrote:
We are going to test this for ourselves but it is our understanding that all 3.65 WiMAX Forum Certified equipment is interoperable but
Jeff AFAIK there is no Wimax Forum 3.65 profile ...
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeff Ehman
Sent: Sunday,
It is the real WiMAX, not the hype of 70 megabits at 70 miles with any
vendor you choose.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
--
From: George Rogato wi...@oregonfast.net
Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2008 11:34
I was told that Redlines's WiMax solution would be interoperable - but
that was a salesmen speaking.
On 12/14/08, Gino Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com wrote:
Well its uses Wimax MAC, but ists not Wimax Forum Certified so the
manufactures don't have to comply with interoperability
Gino A.
WOW - if only the soapbox was really gone.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of rea...@muddyfrogwater.us
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2008 1:24 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Article
And I won't be. I was
To add to Jeff point...WiMAX certification interoperability is limited to a
lowest common denominator -- for example, looking at the MAC,
interoperability is only guaranteed at the BE level (so unless there's some
level of AP / CPE manufacturer cooperation, most of those nifty QoS features
I was told that Redlines's WiMax solution would be interoperable - but
that was a salesmen speaking.
They are...
At a base level
-Charles
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which
it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential
My thoughts inline below:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
U pricing is WAY, WAY different.
Redline AP's are around $10k
Vecima AP's are around $4k
Redline has an FCC approved system with 3 - 120 degree sectors with a 3-way
splitter which allows
John,
What are your thoughts about using the 3.65ghz band that has no
capabilities to handle any type of noise rejection? One of my big
concerns with 3.65ghz is spending a lot of money on base stations, NMS,
etc. and then having someone purchase a $3,000 LigoWave 3.65 point to
point link and
I consider my reply to be of enough value that I am sending out on the WISPA
members list. You will see my reply there.
Scriv
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:28 PM, Travis Johnson t...@ida.net wrote:
John,
What are your thoughts about using the 3.65ghz band that has no
capabilities to handle
22 matches
Mail list logo
