-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kewl. Glad you found it :)
On 5/19/2010 8:12 PM, Stuart Pierce wrote:
Bottom button, File a Response
-- Original Message --
From: Mark McElvy mmce...@accubak.com
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Does anyone use FiberTower for backhauling?
jack
--
Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing
Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993
www.ask-wi.com 818-227-4220 jun...@ask-wi.com
At what percentage of your backbone usage do you look at adding more
capacity. At peak times I run at 65-70 percent of capacity. Just
looking for suggestions.
Sent from my iPhone
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
When you peak at 65-75 percent its probably time to add more. It
depends on how fast your filling it up and how long it takes to
implement the new capacity.
-RickG
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Jeremie Chism jchi...@gmail.com wrote:
At what percentage of your backbone usage do you look at
What do your trends show you?
Take your yearly graph and draw a line along the averages. Extend this
line what does it do?
ryan
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 6:54 AM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
When you peak at 65-75 percent its probably time to add more. It
depends on how fast your
Why do you ask?
Im not saying anyone hasn't, but I have heard they have turned away
providing service to some WISPs. They cater to large carrier and telecom.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: Jack Unger
http://www.solectek.com/products.php?prod=swexcelpage=feat
Brand new complete link without antennas. This is the connectorized version.
Make an offer offlist if you are interested.
-Cameron
WISPA Wants You! Join
Actually, to more fair, I should state...
Fibertower owns and leases spectrum (24/39Ghz) as well as selling backhaul
bandwidth. I would think they'd lease spectrum to anyone that was willing to
pay for it.
I was assuming you were asking about backhaul bandwidth.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL Wireless,
Yesterday, I attended a conference of primarily Rural ILECs with a focus on
the National Broadband Plan. It was very interesting to hear another
perspective of the plan other than from the wireless industry. Below I will
outline some major talking points that were discussed. The first speaker
Agreed. It is time for WISPA to take the next step.
~V~
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 9:33 AM
To: memb...@wispa.org; motor...@afmug.com; 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA]
Wait until Friday, you should.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Cameron Kilton
Yoda speaks!
Chris Gotstein, Sr Network Engineer, UP Logon/Computer Connection UP
http://uplogon.com | +1 906 774 4847 | ch...@uplogon.com
On 5/20/2010 9:50 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Wait until Friday, you should.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
I ask because I'm trying to gather data to support WISPA's FCC filings.
I'll explain...
FiberTower is telling the FCC that they need chunks of TV White Space
spectrum to be LICENSED TO THEM so they can provide point-to-point
backbone bandwidth to serve rural unserved and underserved
We've leased 38GHz spectrum from FiberTower (actually the company prior to
FiberTower) for several years now. We also have one very small fiber PtP
circuit from them simply because they had some available bandwidth between
two common sites and it was easier (which is rare) for us to have them
Old rule of thumb for Ethernet, because it is based on collision
detection, is 70-75% is the max you want. Above this and collisions
often become an issue. I assume the same is true for the faster links
as well.
Jeremie Chism wrote:
At what percentage of your backbone usage do you look at
That depends on how long your peaks last.
The bottom line is that peaks generally only last short periods. If you run
out of peak capacity, the side effect is usually minimal. All that occurs is
that transfers during those peak time slow down a bit and spreadout over a
longer period of time.
Again, the Hartford. A couple of claims in 10 years. No issues.
mc
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:35 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
www.selectiveinsurance.com
I've been very happy with them for several years now. With that said,
I've never had a claim. Maybe the better question is: Who is
Thanks Tom for the information. I appreciate you taking the time our
of your busy day to give me such good information. It is greatly
appreciated. I will make some adjustment to increase cpe bandwidth and
see what happens. Most of my traffic shoul be bursty because it is
business but I do
Well Put.
Have you guys thought about - (sorry jumping in the back end here)
adding squid or caching?
I have seen some major drops on bandwidth when caching is put in place
- up to 30+%
On the other hand - squid is not a replacement for the additional
bandwidth.
On May 20, 2010, at
I agree with Rick¹s percentage. If it is a traditional telco circuit
you should get a concrete answer on how long it will take to add an
additional circuit. I had to go 8 months one time to add another T1 into
our bond.
Justin
--
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Wisp
To point one, it depends on the device and the settings. If set to full
duplex, there should not be collisions in a ptp configuration, but some
inexpensive equipment will still show collisions. In half duplex, there
may be, since only one side can talk at a time. I agree, this is only
for
Jack
My humble opinion is that using TVWS for backhauls is a waste of
resources
My points
Current and future bandwidth requirement of wisps and celcos for
towers are in the
50 Mbps + , so you'll plenty of spectrum to meet the demands, I'll say
more than 50 MHz per link
Propagation of
Why wait until Friday?
Thanks,
Cameron Kilton
Project Manager
Midcoast Internet Solutions
http://www.midcoast.com
c...@midcoast.com
(207) 594-8277 x 108
On 5/20/2010 10:50 AM, Josh Luthman wrote:
Wait until Friday, you should.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100
The list rules strongly suggest for sale/trades are only shared on
Fridays.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston Churchill
On Thu, May
Please pass this on to others in business!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC38D5am7go
Respectfully,
Rick Harnish
President
WISPA
260-307-4000 cell
866-317-2851 WISPA Office
Skype: rick.harnish.
rharn...@wispa.org
Sorry about that, did not know what, well noted now.
Thanks,
Cameron Kilton
Project Manager
Midcoast Internet Solutions
http://www.midcoast.com
c...@midcoast.com
(207) 594-8277 x 108
On 5/20/2010 1:00 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
The list rules strongly suggest for sale/trades are only shared on
No problem, no one is upset I'm sure. It's just courteous to follow the
rules of the Moto Folk.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
“Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue
that counts.”
--- Winston
This is from the second speaker at the conference yesterday.
How the FCC Proposes the Regulate Broadband
Legal Authority
* Many recommendations call into question whether the FCC has the
authority to act. For example:
* USF reform - Does the FCC have authority to add Broadband
Mr. Randall has not received any responses from this yet so I'm resending.
He will be sending me more as he gets them.
Dear Sirs:
I am looking for WISP Services in the following locations,
(Sorry but we do need to place a rush on these locations listed below).
Please be sure
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/announcing-google-tv-tv-meets-web-web
.html
If you think Youtube is bad, wait till this kicks in. I have always said
you need to design your network to meet customer demands, not make customers
fit your network. I would expect ³Internet TVs² and other such
Press Release:
Application and Proposals Due June 1, 2010
Elizabeth Bowles, WISPA Vice President and Association Management Committee
Chair
The WISPA Board has approved hiring an Executive Director and is accepting
proposals from those interested in applying for this position. Below is a
Thought the WISPA General list has its own rules...
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Josh Luthman
j...@imaginenetworksllc.com wrote:
No problem, no one is upset I'm sure. It's just courteous to follow the
rules of the Moto Folk.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 13:36, Jon Auer j...@tapodi.net wrote:
Thought the WISPA General list has its own rules...
It does:
5) No selling or self promotion allowed. (Violations: One Warning then an
Invoice for minimum $150 ad will be generated)
from
Scott,
You raise a very valid point, Half Duplex can have a penalty regarding
throughput and/or collisions, in some cases.
As well it can break bandwdith mangement routines to some extent, because
its not static how much bandwidth will be available at a given time in a
direction to share
Rick,
Good info
How open was that group (rural ILECs) to WISPA in general? Did they agree or
disagree that there were scenergies to work togeather? I would think that
Rural ILECs would benefit heavilly from the NBP goals that favored
subsidizing Rural ILECs.
Basically instead of USF
Tom,
The general perception is that mobile broadband providers will be the most
likely recipients of the Reverse Auction procedure. Voice is going mobile
and they obviously have a solid lobbying front. It would seem logical that
mobile providers could accept lower subsidies with lower overhead
Register for a presentation from Xerox to learn more at:
www.seeuthere.com/MFPsecurity
From: members-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:members-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Rick Harnish
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:01 PM
To: memb...@wispa.org; motor...@afmug.com; 'WISPA General List'
Subject:
Due to the emergency maintenance which was conducted this past weekend, RUS
is extending the 30-day Public Notice Filing period by one day. The new
deadline for existing service providers to file a response to any Public
Notice Filing will be Monday, May 24th at 11:59pm CDT.
-Original
It sounds like a lot of good was taken and contributed to that meeting.
I'm glad you were there.
What interests me most will be to fully learn what scenergies will be found
between our groups.
At the end of the day, when it come to government increasing regulation, the
sides become provider
Depends whether you are asking me or Jeremie.
We dont use caching to save upstream badnwidth, currently. The reason is
that our upstream transit costs are way less expesnive than our last mile
and transport costs.
At one point, I calculated our unlicensed transport costs to be close to
$180
With Ubiquiti and any 2x2mimo N gear, there are two antenna ports or
chains. If mode 1-7 is selected only Chain 0 (antenna port1) is enabled.
If mode 8-14 is selected, the Chain1 (antenna port2) is enabled, and
dependant on how much noise Antenna2 heard, the radio would automatically
enable
Only the Rocket M's have the antenna port on them, all of the others
have built in antennas since Rocket M's are really to be used as
AP's , could I ask what is the vlaue in trying to do what you are asking
for ?
Why not just deploy the Radios with the antennas, that they are designed
to
Sorry for the late reply. It stormed here today and I was busy
watching all the equipment. No we currently do not do any caching.
Sent from my iPhone
On May 20, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net
wrote:
Depends whether you are asking me or Jeremie.
We dont use
I think you missed my point. The same problem exists if I use Nano Stations,
or Built-in antenna models.
I live in a very noisy inconsistent environment. Its uncertain in which
installation cases Dual pol MIMO will work, and which cases it will not.
It all depends on spectral availabilty. I
Makes me think: What about caching on the edge rather than the core of
your network? My goal would not be so much as to save bandwidth but
rather performance to the end user.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Tom DeReggi wirelessn...@rapiddsl.net wrote:
Depends whether you are asking me or
Caching is pretty cheap - if you know how to do it cheap.
Whats nice is - you can actually cache multiple places
Edge however is wisest imho if you have to choose 1 location for most -
If your interested in a dead easy cache (squid) method - pfsense is
free and the squid package is brainless
46 matches
Mail list logo
