Bob - your using time warners bandwidth -
simply use theirs - your ip ranges are theirs anyhow -
best results - as I have found :-)
On Sep 12, 2010, at 11:03 PM, Robert West wrote:
I use Speedtest.Net for my own tests to verify my CPE settings. Yeah,
sometimes it sucks but I have to
Bob, How do you do burst at 2x the contracted speed on UBNT? AFAIK, the
burst is in bytes transfered, not bits per second.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:
I do bursting too. 2x the contracted speed. Makes a big WOW response with
web pages and had
Yep,set burst at cpe,works very nice!
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 23:24:20
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Reply-To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re:
Dave,I'm fairly sure moto let's you set the burst on the sm,same place you set
the ul/dl speeds.
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: David Williamson dwilliam...@customcomputersva.com
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 23:35:23
To: WISPA General
Mikrotik routers would handle all of this. If I'd done it, I'd tell
you how.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/13/2010 3:24 AM, RickG wrote:
Bob, How do you do burst at 2x the contracted speed on UBNT? AFAIK,
the burst is in bytes transfered,
Its worse then that here. Were 6ms off the local speedtest server. And it
still gives us crap.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(877) 804-3001 x106
From: Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2010 11:03 PM
To: WISPA General
An elevated noise floor will push your avg rssi levels up basically
making your acceptable EUM signal levels higher than usual. A typical
EUM under perfect conditions can have link up to -89, but with an
elevated noise floor the acceptable signal level becomes higher and
higher. You'll need
You need a router or bandwidth shaper that limits the burst rate independently
of the SM.
Jerry Richardson
Sent Mobile
On Sep 13, 2010, at 1:25 AM, RickG
rgunder...@gmail.commailto:rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Bob, How do you do burst at 2x the contracted speed on UBNT? AFAIK, the burst
is in
All you need to do is cap the max data rate. Let the sm handle bursting.
Jerry Richardson
Sent Mobile
On Sep 13, 2010, at 9:32 AM, RickG
rgunder...@gmail.commailto:rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
I didnt catch that part from Bob but thats what I'm thinking. So, I'll add
bursting to my RB1000.
All my APs are Mikrotik. My CPE’s are a mix of Tranzeo and UBNT. I have a AP
with 58 Clients on it and starting to get complaints about slowdowns. They are
all setup 10 MHz channel 802.11g. This is a tower that due to contractual
issues I cannot add anymore equipment. So I am considering
What kind of bandwidth are you pushing through the ap now?
On Sep 13, 2010 1:32 PM, Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com wrote:
All my APs are Mikrotik. My CPE’s are a mix of Tranzeo and UBNT. I have a
AP with 58 Clients on it and starting to get complaints about slowdowns.
They are all setup 10 MHz
At peak times I am running about 4-6M 95th percentile on this one AP.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Servicehttp://www.rcwifi.com/
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:34 PM
To: WISPA General
Can you go to a bigger channel size? Are the CPE's running any form of QoS?
On 09/13/2010 01:43 PM, Steve Barnes wrote:
*At peak times I am running about 4-6M 95^th percentile on this one AP. *
* *
*Steve Barnes *
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Service http://www.rcwifi.com/
*From:*
Or have you tried different channels? Is it a newer radio in the MT
so you can do a spectrum analysis?
I would expect up to 15 megs aggregate out of a 10Mhz 802.11a AP and
if you are at 1/3 of that then bandwidth isn't an issue.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne
From personal experience I can tell you that you will be very happy
when you make the switch. I just replaced three Mikrotik BH/AP units,
pings went from their rather wild 30-120ms swings to a steady 15ms no
matter what time. Just be ready for three things, you can't put
usernames in the ACL
I guess I didn't make myself clear. They are not concerned about slow speeds
of downloads more of a matter that there is 60 clients hitting an AP with no
TDMA or any kind of timing and they start griping about their VOIP. I was
always told that on a 20 mhz 802.11b/g network that you were best
Can the UBNT co-exist with MT APs in the same environment or will the
UBNT wipe out all other 802.11x based APs on nearby channels within
hearing distance?
On 9/13/2010 1:10 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
From personal experience I can tell you that you will be very happy
when you make the switch. I
Cheapest depends on location. I have seen Cogent in the sub $1 per meg
in places. I have seen Hurricane Electric meet or beat cogent pricing in
other markets. I have seen level3 beat cogent pricing in certain markets.
--
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog xISP News
I see, you're talking about quality not raw speeds - you said
complaints about slowdowns. I would say TDMA would be the best bet
to solve this problem cost effectively.
If you half the channel size, half the number of clients. Not the
other way around.
Can the UBNT co-exist
Contract issues
We enabled WMM on our Mikrotik's and then just added a Mangle rule to
ensure the DSCP was marked correctly, this solved VoIP issues for our users.
On 09/13/2010 02:20 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
I see, you're talking about quality not raw speeds - you said
complaints about slowdowns. I would say
Forbes, so are you saying: if I change and go to a Rocket with Airmax dual pol
antenna and I have a client with a UBNT Bullet M2 HP Connected to a Laird 24Dbi
Grid Vertical only dish, that even though the Bullet has Airmax as part of it,
it wont connect. Or are you saying that all your clients
I think Airmax is a transport protocol, like 802.11a/b/g/n.
The way I understand it, to do 802.11n (or Airmax MIMO) you need two
streams. If it catches only one stream, it falls back to a/g.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On
Polling is what makes systems like Canopy and Nstreme shine. The
polling is different than the MIMO technology. Mimo is Antenna and TDMA is
polling. 802.11 was never designed for outdoor so the polling is flawed for
such purposes. I have seen 5ghz Mikrotik units with nstreme enabled that
experience here shows sub 50 as a max - for the price point - it cannot be
beat however
On Sep 13, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Justin Wilson wrote:
Polling is what makes systems like Canopy and Nstreme shine. The polling
is different than the MIMO technology. Mimo is Antenna and TDMA is
Steve,
All of our 2.4 are Mikrotik and we're pretty happy with that but as you
say past 50 it starts to get pretty ugly. We added an M2 and put some
dual polarity CPE out there, they worked great with it. We turned
Airmax off because we had a non-M2 UBNT radio that we wanted to connect,
it
Glenn, My concern is I already have 58 clients on a MT AP. I need Double
that. Your saying you don't see more than 50 working right. Please explain.
UBNT says 300 Clients per AP no problem.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Servicehttp://www.rcwifi.com/
From:
If your mixing non airmax with airmax - about 50 is the max
if not - then seems much better - just run airmax
:-)
hope that helps
On Sep 13, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Steve Barnes wrote:
Glenn, My concern is I already have 58 clients on a MT AP. I need Double
that. Your saying you don’t see
In my experience Tranzeo and UBNT don't play nice together. If you
don't mind switching out your tranzeo CPE's with UBNT gear you'll be fine.
Steve Barnes wrote:
All my APs are Mikrotik. My CPE’s are a mix of Tranzeo and UBNT. I
have a AP with 58 Clients on it and starting to get
Brett, I'm impressed with your knowledge of Mikrotik programming so I
wanted to ask you this. Last week and further back about four times a
week we had a cascading crash of our bridged network whereas the LAN
side of the Mikrotik Backhauls would crash presumably from traffic.
Wireshark
On your ubnt equipment - did you enable stp ?
using a syslog -? might show a good amount of info if so
On Sep 13, 2010, at 3:30 PM, Forbes Mercy wrote:
Brett, I'm impressed with your knowledge of Mikrotik programming so I
wanted to ask you this. Last week and further back about four times
I think UBNT means 300 per cell or per 3 radios. So, only 100 per ap radio.
t
Glenn, My concern is I already have 58 clients on a MT AP. I need
Double that. Your saying you dont see more than 50 working right.
Please explain. UBNT says 300 Clients per AP no problem.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi
More than 50 per any AP and you're running out of bandwidth.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/13/2010 2:13 PM, Glenn Kelley wrote:
experience here shows sub 50 as a max - for the price point - it
cannot be beat however
On Sep 13, 2010, at
And I think that's a very optimistic number even at that... but time
will tell.
Travis
Microserv
On 9/13/2010 1:53 PM, Tony C. Loosle wrote:
I think UBNT means 300 per cell or per 3 radios. So, only 100 per ap
radio.
t
Glenn, My concern is I already have 58 clients on a MT AP. I need
Mike explain. Doesn't that depend on your over subscription and queues. We
use MT control queues and sell a 1024 X 256 and 2048 X 51 service off this
tower. I feed it with a 20Mb Link.
Steve Barnes
RC-WiFi Wireless Internet Servicehttp://www.rcwifi.com/
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Try the Fort Myers, FL site. I host that server here in our facility.
---Chris
On Sep 13, 2010, at 9:05 AM, Nick Olsen wrote:
Its worse then that here. Were 6ms off the local speedtest server. And it
still gives us crap.
Nick Olsen
Network Operations
(877) 804-3001 x106
From:
Well, it is dependent on what you sell, but I believe we should be
selling bigger and bigger packages and to future-proof ourselves from
the oncoming video surge.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
On 9/13/2010 3:01 PM, Steve Barnes wrote:
Mike
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 12:30 -0700, Forbes Mercy wrote:
Brett,
Not sure who Brett is, but...
Wireshark showed some anomalies such as IPv6 traffic
There is more IPV6 traffic on the network than most people realize.
I've got captures from about 40 networks dating back to about a year and
a
We inherited a bridged network (bridged EoIP tunnels over routing
w/OSPF) that had similar problems. It turned out to be caused by Belkin
(and similar) routers that resend packets they don't think they should
have received (or don't know what to do with) back out their WAN
interface. If you have
Agreed. Here where I am at 3 Meg is the lower end. People are used to having
more and more bandwidth. Most of my customers are in the 6-8 Meg range with
some wanting 10-15. It doesn't matter that they really don't need more that
probably 4. That is what the customer wants so I guess that is
I have 50 to 70 clients on a b MT AP and it handles it fine. I've even heard
of over 100 on a only-g MT AP.
Chris
- Original Message -
From: Steve Barnes st...@pcswin.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:16 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Taking the
How long does it typically take for these to show up when submitted?
I put one in this morning (and didn't bother to record the confirmation
number), but don't see it there yet.
Randy
On 9/13/2010 3:12 PM, Rick Harnish wrote:
*UPDATE: WISP Filing updates are beginning to show up in the
From: Rick Harnish [mailto:rharn...@wispa.org]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 5:32 PM
To: 'motor...@afmug.com'
Subject: RE: [Motorola II] Re: [WISPA] [IMPORTANCE LEVEL: HIGH] TV
Whitespaces Support Letter Template
Usually 12-24 hours not counting weekends. I'm sure the FCC wants to
From: Rick Harnish [mailto:rharn...@wispa.org]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 5:53 PM
To: 'motor...@afmug.com'
Subject: RE: [Motorola II] RE: [WISPA Members] [IMPORTANCE LEVEL: HIGH] TV
Whitespaces Support Letter Template
Adam,
Steve Coran said we should use Ex Parte for the
Hi All,
I've got a small town that is literally a 1 mile x 1 mile square. I have
two towers, one is North, 10 miles from the town, the other is East, 11
miles from the town. This town is heavily covered by trees. Most
customers thus far have no LOS to either tower, or are skimming the
3.65 is limited in that you can only go as high as 99 feet I believe - someone
will correct me if I am wrong.
If you are using airmax - 2.4 should help
5ghz you may have some issues w/ trees however
My suggestion is a mix - I noticed that you have not mentioned 900mhz
900 and trees
900 won't do 10 megs.
Get on the tower with a Ubiquiti and the dual pol panels (powerbridge?) and
put up an omni or sector with 2.4 or 5. Depending on terrain all subs under
a mile should be fine.
On Sep 13, 2010 6:58 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
3.65 is limited in that you can
Would this be a good application for a mesh network? The towers feeding the
town from both sides, and a mesh through out town?
Greg
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Nick White wrote:
Hi All,
I've got a small town that is literally a 1 mile x 1 mile square. I have
two towers, one is North, 10
I use it for all,they always exceed the contracted rates,no complaint from any!
Sent from my BlackBerry®
-Original Message-
From: RickG rgunder...@gmail.com
Sender: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 12:32:25
To: WISPA General Listwireless@wispa.org
Reply-To: WISPA General
I have not seen mesh done on the cheap however
but open to some ideas for sure
On Sep 13, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
Would this be a good application for a mesh network? The towers feeding the
town from both sides, and a mesh through out town?
Greg
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:50 PM,
how about Ubiquti with Openmesh
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
I have not seen mesh done on the cheap however
but open to some ideas for sure
On Sep 13, 2010, at 7:02 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
Would this be a good application for a mesh network? The
Is there a way to do openmesh without having to give them revenue?
On Sep 13, 2010, at 7:13 PM, Philip Dorr wrote:
how about Ubiquti with Openmesh
_
Glenn Kelley | Principle | HostMedic |www.HostMedic.com
I have a 'town' I have setup like that (just a large group of towns,
they call it a village). A couple PowerStation2's fed from 5ghz covers
it well. I also made a few key locations AP's. I take the clients AP's
and make them switchs, disabling the wifi. Then add a name on my units
for them to use.
I am unaware of the 99 limit. I actually have a set at 185 ft.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 13, 2010, at 5:58 PM, Glenn Kelley gl...@hostmedic.com wrote:
3.65 is limited in that you can only go as high as 99 feet I believe -
someone will correct me if I am wrong.
If you are using airmax -
I can ask our licensing guy - he had seemed for some reason to think this was
the rule.
Thanks for the heads up.. worth asking again @ least.
I have a location I can use it now - (to get to my own home) - we are looking @
290 foot - or want to @ least
Thanks
On Sep 13, 2010, at 8:01 PM,
Correction, large group of houses.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Jeromie Reeves jree...@18-30chat.net wrote:
I have a 'town' I have setup like that (just a large group of towns,
they call it a village). A couple PowerStation2's fed from 5ghz covers
it well. I also made a few key locations
At 9/13/2010 07:02 PM, you wrote:
900 won't do 10 megs.
The new Ubiquiti M-series Airmax 900 MHz radios should do it. MCS10
in a 5 MHz quarter-channel is around 10 Mbps. A lower-loss path
could allow MCS11 or MCS12. While you can't synchronize sectors,
they look like they will outperform
But then I'm pinging within network and that tells me nothing.
Bob-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Glenn Kelley
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 2:08 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test
Bob - your using
Advanced tab.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 4:25 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test
Bob, How do you do burst at 2x the contracted speed on UBNT? AFAIK, the
burst is in
I just wish that UBNT would have a burst TIME limit like Mikrotik does.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of j284...@yahoo.com
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 7:14 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed
Yep.
Was playing with that today, actually.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Mike Hammett
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 8:05 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] speed test
Mikrotik routers would handle all of this. If
I've now been defaulted to PIKETON!Piketon is in the middle of nowhere
and is a defunct nuclear plutonium enrichment facility for the US
government. MIDDLE OF THE STICKS!
HA!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Nick Olsen
Sent:
With the low cost of Ubnt gear, why not run real relays? The area is
small enough to not need a unreasonable amount of relays.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.com wrote:
At 9/13/2010 07:02 PM, you wrote:
900 won't do 10 megs.
The new Ubiquiti M-series Airmax
Works fine. I’m now 99.999% UBNT!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf
Of Steve Barnes
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 1:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Taking the plunge
All my APs are Mikrotik. My CPE’s are a mix of Tranzeo
Bursting rocks! But do it on the CPE and CHARGE for it if you can. Heck, 5
bucks extra? Could be a profit center.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 12:32 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re:
At 9/13/2010 09:23 PM, you wrote:
With the low cost of Ubnt gear, why not run real relays? The area is
small enough to not need a unreasonable amount of relays.
What do you mean by real relays? A mesh or routed network or
whatever you want to call it is a set of relays. I may be missing
out
Backhauls?
Greg
On Sep 13, 2010, at 9:16 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 9/13/2010 09:23 PM, you wrote:
With the low cost of Ubnt gear, why not run real relays? The area is
small enough to not need a unreasonable amount of relays.
What do you mean by real relays? A mesh or routed network or
I know you got 'em.
I'm looking for some nice pics of the various ways of mounting sector
antennas. I have a tower with 5 to 10 and even 20 structural tube to mount
to, three sided classic 1980's tower. 300 footer. I'm the king at ripping
off designs and welding up my own (sorry, my bad)
Steve,
After several firmware updates and configurations, I finally have the warm
fuzzies about my RocketM5 sectors. These 4 sectors are on my main tower
and are backhauls for my whole network! I have not had time to work with my
2.4 sectors since the last go around was a flop. After upgrading
Did you do that in your firewall, the ap, or both?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.comwrote:
We enabled WMM on our Mikrotik's and then just added a Mangle rule to
ensure the DSCP was marked correctly, this solved VoIP issues for our
users.
On 09/13/2010
Yo, dude! Sectors acting as backhaul? Now I LIKE that idea!
I shall steal it from you and make it my own.
Nuff said.
Bob-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 10:40 PM
To: WISPA General
From what I can tell, any legacy radio, including UBNT's own do not get
along with M AP's. I've had issues and have been switching out M AP's
for standard UBNT units on my repeaters to resolve the problem. Once I have
client base switched out to M units, I'll switch back to M AP's. MM's -
do you
Sorry, when ever people talk about mesh they most often mean 1 radio
meshing. Multiradio relays generally do not benefit from most of the
mesh software. OSPF or rSTP works very well and are generally stable
and are generally supported and have many tools. I keep everything off
the radio I possibly
Whats the .001 unit?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:
Works fine. I’m now 99.999% UBNT!
*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *Steve Barnes
*Sent:* Monday, September 13, 2010 1:32 PM
*To:*
I currently let the SM do both. I swap back forth on what to let the SM do
and what to have the firewall do.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Jerry Richardson
jrichard...@aircloud.comwrote:
All you need to do is cap the max data rate. Let the sm handle bursting.
Jerry Richardson
Sent
I get it now. Missing a lot of sleep lately. So, how many bytes do you allow
the bursting for?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:
Advanced tab.
*From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] *On
Behalf Of *RickG
Ditto.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.comwrote:
I just wish that UBNT would have a burst TIME limit like Mikrotik does.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of j284...@yahoo.com
Lots of pics on our blog at: http://www.mtin.net/blog . Tagged under
tower and install.
Also have a gallery under Facebook.
Hit me offline for more.
--
Justin Wilson j...@mtin.net
http://www.mtin.net/blog xISP News
http://www.twitter.com/j2sw Follow me on Twitter
Wisp
At 9/13/2010 10:57 PM, Jeromie wrote:
Sorry, when ever people talk about mesh they most often mean 1 radio
meshing.
First-generation mesh networks with one radio were awful. I didn't
think that was what Greg had in mind. Second-generation mesh
networks separated the backhaul (meshing) from
probably a mikrotik router or two
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:58 PM, RickG rgunder...@gmail.com wrote:
Whats the .001 unit?
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Robert West robert.w...@just-micro.com
wrote:
Works fine. I’m now 99.999% UBNT!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
At 9/13/2010 10:43 PM, Robert West wrote:
Yo, dude! Sectors acting as backhaul? Now I LIKE that idea!
I shall steal it from you and make it my own.
Nuff said.
Why not? I'm working on a design now that has 15-20 access points
fed from a sector antenna on a tower. (I couldn't put that many
Your welcome! I put them up earlier this year. The first station was a
RocketM5 Dish, 13 miles out. Truly set it and forget it! It worked so well
that it threw me for a loop when I had issues with the 2.4 sectors. At any
rate, I've been adding UBNT M5 dishes and other M5 units as backhauls to the
I know a guy in Florida who put up a PTP link for every customer! Of course,
that was from the rooftop of a high rise.
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Fred Goldstein fgoldst...@ionary.comwrote:
At 9/13/2010 10:43 PM, Robert West wrote:
Yo, dude! Sectors acting as backhaul? Now I LIKE
Nice. Is that angle iron for the standoff?
Hopefully NOT Home Depot wire ties though. I HATE their military rated
wire ties. What a joke, as I've said before and not so nicely.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent:
Yep. Just one last lonely 433 board with an XR2 card. However we DO still use
a 600a at the shop.
BUT..! Working on putting another 433 back into service for a
weird install with another XR2 card and a couple of Luxul circular polarized
antennas. All from the Junk Pile.A
Winter break?
That's when I spend all night up on a tower in the carharts, ski mask and
goggles...
No break!
This year I may add a flask of rum to the tool bucket.
Bob-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent:
Kinky.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of RickG
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2010 12:02 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Taking the plunge
I know a guy in Florida who put up a PTP link for every customer! Of course,
that
You be right! I have one hub with multiple backhauls on it. My problem was
always the sectors being 15 to 19dbi gain but the grids being a good 29. My
furthest out is 20 miles, not good for a 15dbi sector, but most other AP's
can see the hub's sectors at at least a -74. In fact, I've USED
87 matches
Mail list logo
