Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-05 Thread Ron Wallace
I just looked and there were 240 listed at 8:50 EDT 
10/05/05.  My comments were not there, in fact I didn't see 
anyones that I recognized.  Only about 10-20 listed since 
n9/1/05.

 Original message 
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:24:57 -0700
From: George [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to 
go!  
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org

Ok something wacky is going on.
Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186

George

Tony Weasler wrote:
 Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my 
first filing
 I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it 
from
 COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD.
 
 The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that 
you send to
 the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it 
with the
 correct information.
 
 Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought 
they filed
 should check to see if your filing is still there:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-
186start=1end=2000first_time=N
 
  - Tony
 
 P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 
1/1/05 are
 marked as Document Type: NOTICE and not STATEMENT 
or STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD  Is it possible that statements are being 
erased as
 well?  I filed one copy as a STATEMENT and another as 
a STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD and both have identical information in the 
search
 results.  Should we be filing notices instead?
 
 
 On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:
 
Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next 
day after we
sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 
responses and
my response can not be found.
Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their 
response missing?

George


John Scrivner wrote:


I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a 
clear message
to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to 
unused
television channel space. Your messages are going to be 
heard.  04-186
is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 
opposition
from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who 
do not want
anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 
already told the
FCC that you need those unused television channels to 
help grow your
business and serve those hard to reach customers then 
please do so
now. Here are the instructions once again:

GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in 
the blanks
with your contact information. Use the guide below for 
specific lines
to help you with items you may not know how to fill in 
correctly.

1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your 
name which I
will assume you guys have covered. :-)

Then type your comments about why you need those TV 
channels for
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the 
FCC. Just tell
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use 
correct
spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is 
only one
sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP 
industry on this
NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many 
comments in
support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this 
ruling.

Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to 
pass this on if
you are.



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Ron Wallace
Hahnron, Inc.
220 S. Jackson St.
Addison, MI 49220

Phone:  (517) 547-8410
Mobile:  (517) 605-4542
e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] Comments after closing period is over.

2005-10-05 Thread Frank Muto
Comments after closing period is over, as explained on Cyber Telecom:

After the comment period is closed but before a decision has been made by
the FCC, an interested party can still make its views knows.  All a party
has to do is follow the FCC's ex parte rules, which sounds a lot harder than
it is.  Just think about what is fair and democratic.  If one party comes
and makes an argument to the FCC, all of the other parties would want to
know about that and have a chance to respond.  And that is exactly what the
rules permit.  You can usually come during this period and argue anything
that you want in any way that you want - you simply must file a summary of
your presentation with the Secretary of the FCC for inclusion in the record
of that proceeding.  More information on ex parte rules can be found at
http://www.fcc.gov/ogc/admain/ex_parte_factsheet.html

This is where the competitve services providers fall short and that is the
understanding on how the rule making process works and how to work the
process. If the comments do not address what the FCC is seeking, how could
it be expected for them to make a decision? If at all?

Here are some links of reference to get a handle on how things work from
Robert Cannon's CyberTelecom Website

http://www.cybertelecom.org/faqs/apa.htm

http://www.cybertelecom.org/faqs/fcc101.htm



Frank Muto
Co-founder -  Washington Bureau for ISP Advocacy - WBIA
Telecom Summit Ad Hoc Committee
http://gigabytemarch.blog.com/ www.wbia.us



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-05 Thread Ron Wallace
Guys,
try this URL:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts

i found 351 entries, however, there were only 127 since 
9/12/05.  Only 49 entries in Oct. 2005.  Mine was there, I 
did not see Georges, in fact there was short note begging 
George not send more.

Ron Wallace

 Original message 
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:24:57 -0700
From: George [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to 
go!  
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org

Ok something wacky is going on.
Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186

George

Tony Weasler wrote:
 Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my 
first filing
 I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it 
from
 COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD.
 
 The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that 
you send to
 the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it 
with the
 correct information.
 
 Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought 
they filed
 should check to see if your filing is still there:
 http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-
186start=1end=2000first_time=N
 
  - Tony
 
 P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 
1/1/05 are
 marked as Document Type: NOTICE and not STATEMENT 
or STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD  Is it possible that statements are being 
erased as
 well?  I filed one copy as a STATEMENT and another as 
a STATEMENT
 FOR THE RECORD and both have identical information in the 
search
 results.  Should we be filing notices instead?
 
 
 On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:
 
Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next 
day after we
sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 
responses and
my response can not be found.
Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their 
response missing?

George


John Scrivner wrote:


I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a 
clear message
to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to 
unused
television channel space. Your messages are going to be 
heard.  04-186
is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 
opposition
from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who 
do not want
anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 
already told the
FCC that you need those unused television channels to 
help grow your
business and serve those hard to reach customers then 
please do so
now. Here are the instructions once again:

GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in 
the blanks
with your contact information. Use the guide below for 
specific lines
to help you with items you may not know how to fill in 
correctly.

1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your 
name which I
will assume you guys have covered. :-)

Then type your comments about why you need those TV 
channels for
broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the 
FCC. Just tell
them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use 
correct
spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is 
only one
sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP 
industry on this
NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many 
comments in
support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this 
ruling.

Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to 
pass this on if
you are.



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Ron Wallace
Hahnron, Inc.
220 S. Jackson St.
Addison, MI 49220

Phone:  (517) 547-8410
Mobile:  (517) 605-4542
e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] High Tech HEROS in the adtermath!

2005-10-05 Thread George

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9591546
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to go!

2005-10-05 Thread George

Glad you found the list.
But I'm confused on how many are valid or not and did we do something wrong.

George


Ron Wallace wrote:

Guys,
try this URL:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-
bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts

i found 351 entries, however, there were only 127 since 
9/12/05.  Only 49 entries in Oct. 2005.  Mine was there, I 
did not see Georges, in fact there was short note begging 
George not send more.


Ron Wallace

 Original message 


Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2005 11:24:57 -0700
From: George [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
Subject: Re: [WISPA] For those who have commented - Way to 


go!  


To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org

Ok something wacky is going on.
Now when I look I see 349 responses and mine is there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-


bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-186


George

Tony Weasler wrote:

Mine was also removed.  I think that it was because in my 


first filing

I didn't check the 'late-filed' box and I didn't change it 


from


COMMENT to STATEMENT FOR THE RECORD.

The moral of the story is: keep a copy of anything that 


you send to

the government.  Fortunately, I did and re-submitted it 


with the


correct information.

Thanks for the heads-up, George!  Everyone who thought 


they filed


should check to see if your filing is still there:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/cgi-


bin/websql/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.hts?
ws_mode=retrieve_listid_proceeding=04-
186start=1end=2000first_time=N


- Tony

P.S.  I just noticed that most of the other filings after 


1/1/05 are

marked as Document Type: NOTICE and not STATEMENT 


or STATEMENT

FOR THE RECORD  Is it possible that statements are being 


erased as

well?  I filed one copy as a STATEMENT and another as 


a STATEMENT

FOR THE RECORD and both have identical information in the 


search


results.  Should we be filing notices instead?


On 10/4/2005 10:29 AM, George created:



Funny thing is I filled this one out.
I could have sworn there was like 295 responses the next 


day after we

sent this to the various lists and now there is only 242 


responses and


my response can not be found.
Anyone else notice this and does anyone else see their 


response missing?


George


John Scrivner wrote:



I just wanted to say thank you to all who are sending a 


clear message

to the new FCC about the stalled ruling for access to 


unused

television channel space. Your messages are going to be 


heard.  04-186

is key to the future growth of our industry. We face huge 


opposition

from the NAB (National Association of Broadcasters) who 


do not want

anyone else playing in their sandbox. If you have not 


already told the

FCC that you need those unused television channels to 


help grow your

business and serve those hard to reach customers then 


please do so


now. Here are the instructions once again:

GO RIGHT NOW TO:
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi

A from will appear magically in your web browser. Fill in 


the blanks

with your contact information. Use the guide below for 


specific lines

to help you with items you may not know how to fill in 


correctly.


1) Where it says Proceeding type in 04-186
2) For the Mail Correspondence to line click on Name.
4) and 5) Leave Blank
11) Check Late Filed check box.
12) Select the drop down for Statement for the Record

The other lines not listed above are things like your 


name which I


will assume you guys have covered. :-)

Then type your comments about why you need those TV 


channels for

broadband. Give good reasons and do not argue with the 


FCC. Just tell

them why you need the channels. Use good grammar, use 


correct

spelling, be as good a writer as you can even if it is 


only one

sentence. I want to see 500 comments from the WISP 


industry on this

NPRM over the next 5 days. Let's bury them in so many 


comments in

support of this NPRM that the FCC cannot deny us this 


ruling.


Thanks guys,
Scriv

PS. I am not on any other list servers so feel free to 


pass this on if


you are.




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Ron Wallace
Hahnron, Inc.
220 S. Jackson St.
Addison, MI 49220

Phone:  (517) 547-8410
Mobile:  (517) 605-4542
e-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

2005-10-05 Thread G.Villarini








IIRC, Next web is a Axcellera shop 
nice price tag for a unlicensed WISP.





Gino A. Villarini, 

Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

www.aeronetpr.com

787.767.7466











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric DaVersa
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005
12:22 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org;
isp-investor@isp-investor.com; isp-wireless@isp-wireless.com
Subject: [WISPA] Covad to acquire
NextWeb for $23M





Some good industry news this morning
 adds some substance to WISP valuations. We do work with both of
these companies so theres some personal reward here. Of course
that places us under confidentiality and limited in commentary.
grin

-Eric



Covad to acquire NextWeb for
$23 mln

Wed Oct 5, 2005 06:56 AM ET 



Oct 5 (Reuters) - Covad Communications Group
(DVW.A: Quote,
Profile,
Research)
, a provider of integrated voice and data communications, on Wednesday said it
agreed to acquire Internet provider NextWeb Inc. for about $23 million in cash
and stock. 

Covad also said it would assume $1.7 million in net debt under the
deal. 








Our acquisition of NextWeb accelerates
Covad's entry into the emerging wireless broadband market, Covad Chief
Executive and President Charles Hoffman said in a statement. 



The deal, which includes $4 million in cash and $19 million in
Covad shares, is expected to close by the end of the year. 

Covad said a portion of its shares to be issued would be
restricted from sale in the open market for a period of time. 



Privately held NextWeb is California's
largest fixed-wireless service provider for business. 



Shares in Covad closed at $1.05 on Tuesday on the American Stock
Exchange. (Reporting by Renu Pariyadath in Bangalore)





Eric DaVersa



Vice-President, Business Development





NetLogix





OFFICE: 858.764.1998





CELL: 858.245.6702





FAX: 858.764.1982





[EMAIL PROTECTED]























-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

2005-10-05 Thread George

G.Villarini wrote:

IIRC, Next web is a Axcellera shop … nice price tag for a unlicensed WISP.

 


Gino A. Villarini,



Anyone know how many subs and what the annual revenue of Next web is?
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

2005-10-05 Thread G.Villarini
100 customers paying $49.95, wet-11 CPE's  NOT!!! :-)


Gino A. Villarini, 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

G.Villarini wrote:
 IIRC, Next web is a Axcellera shop . nice price tag for a unlicensed WISP.
 
  
 
 Gino A. Villarini,
 

Anyone know how many subs and what the annual revenue of Next web is?
George
-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NY Times article

2005-10-05 Thread Mac Dearman


  Wireless is definitely in the news since Katrina - - - here is an 
article in the New York Times today


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/05/technology/techspecial/05belson.html

and these are some that came out in the last day or two via the 
Associated Press and picked up all over the Country


http://news.google.com/news?hl=entab=wnie=UTF-8q=mac+dearmanfilter=0

Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC.
www.inetsouth.com
www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts)
318-728-8600 - Rayville
318-728-9600
318-376-2562 - cell


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] More Katrina Pics

2005-10-05 Thread Rick Harnish








http://www.flickr.com/photos/wispa_rick_harnish/
or do a tag search for katrinawireless at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/
to see all pictures which have been related to the effort so far.



Thanks,



Rick Harnish

President

OnlyInternet Broadband  Wireless, Inc.

260-827-2482 Office

260-307-4000 Cell

260-918-4340 VoIP

www.oibw.net

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



 












-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

2005-10-05 Thread Richard Munoz

100 customers paying $49.95, wet-11 CPE's  NOT!!! :-)


What is wrong with wet-11's?  Aren't they about 100x more reliable than 
Can-o-pee :-D  duck and run


-Richard M.



Gino A. Villarini,
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

G.Villarini wrote:
IIRC, Next web is a Axcellera shop . nice price tag for a unlicensed 
WISP.




Gino A. Villarini,



Anyone know how many subs and what the annual revenue of Next web is?
George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/118 - Release Date: 10/3/2005




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NY Times article

2005-10-05 Thread George

Wow, what a great story about Mac.
George


Mac Dearman wrote:


  Wireless is definitely in the news since Katrina - - - here is an 
article in the New York Times today


http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/05/technology/techspecial/05belson.html

and these are some that came out in the last day or two via the 
Associated Press and picked up all over the Country


http://news.google.com/news?hl=entab=wnie=UTF-8q=mac+dearmanfilter=0

Mac Dearman
Maximum Access, LLC.
www.inetsouth.com
www.radioresponse.org (Katrina relief efforts)
318-728-8600 - Rayville
318-728-9600
318-376-2562 - cell




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] PTP Link

2005-10-05 Thread Jory Privett
I am trying to do a 21 mile PtP link and need some equipment.  I so far I 
would like to have an Orthogon Gemini Lite  but the price tag is pretty 
high.  Is there anything out there that would work as well but be a little 
more cost effective?   Would someone happen to have some used/refurbish 
units that they want to get rid of?   I also have a load of 2.4 equipment I 
could trade/sell if someone was interested in that.

Jory Privett
WCCS


-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] NY Times article

2005-10-05 Thread George

Brian Webster wrote:
 you represented everyone well.

Thank You,
Brian Webster


Yep, makes me proud to know you.

George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] PTP Link

2005-10-05 Thread George
if your looking for a low cost  link, you might want to check out 
Star-Os and their new StarVX WAR boards.
They do 5, 10, and 20MHz channel spacing and are only like 320.00 or so 
for each end.

They do bridging as well.


www.Star-Os.com

George


Jory Privett wrote:
I am trying to do a 21 mile PtP link and need some equipment.  I so far I 
would like to have an Orthogon Gemini Lite  but the price tag is pretty 
high.  Is there anything out there that would work as well but be a little 
more cost effective?   Would someone happen to have some used/refurbish 
units that they want to get rid of?   I also have a load of 2.4 equipment I 
could trade/sell if someone was interested in that.


Jory Privett
WCCS




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] PTP Link

2005-10-05 Thread George

sorry, it's 335.00 each end, but you get an extra card.
http://www.star-os.com/prices.php

George


George wrote:
if your looking for a low cost  link, you might want to check out 
Star-Os and their new starVX WAR boards.
They do 5, 10, and 20MHz channel spacing and are only like 320.00 or so 
for each end.

They do bridging as well.


www.Star-Os.com

George


Jory Privett wrote:

I am trying to do a 21 mile PtP link and need some equipment.  I so 
far I would like to have an Orthogon Gemini Lite  but the price tag is 
pretty high.  Is there anything out there that would work as well but 
be a little more cost effective?   Would someone happen to have some 
used/refurbish units that they want to get rid of?   I also have a 
load of 2.4 equipment I could trade/sell if someone was interested in 
that.


Jory Privett
WCCS






--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] PTP Link

2005-10-05 Thread Scott Reed




Take a look at Mikrotik products and their Nstreme protocol.



Scott Reed 
Owner 
NewWays 
Wireless Networking 
Network Design, Installation and Administration 
www.nwwnet.net

-- Original Message ---
From: Jory Privett [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: WISPA List wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 17:14:32 -0500 
Subject: [WISPA] PTP Link 

 I am trying to do a 21 mile PtP link and need some equipment.  I so far I 
 would like to have an Orthogon Gemini Lite  but the price tag is pretty 
 high.  Is there anything out there that would work as well but be a little 
 more cost effective?   Would someone happen to have some used/refurbish 
 units that they want to get rid of?   I also have a load of 2.4 equipment I 
 could trade/sell if someone was interested in that. 
 
 Jory Privett 
 WCCS 
 
 -- 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org 
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
--- End of Original Message ---





-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] satellite imaging company?

2005-10-05 Thread Scott Reed




My local county government is making it available free. Only our county, but check out http://www.co.wayne.in.us/gis/index.html

Maybe you can find something similar for your area.

Scott Reed 
Owner 
NewWays 
Wireless Networking 
Network Design, Installation and Administration 
www.nwwnet.net

-- Original Message ---
From: George [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org 
Sent: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 16:06:00 -0700 
Subject: [WISPA] satellite imaging company? 

 Anyone have experience with buying imagery for your area from a 
 satellite imaging company? 
 
 I got a quote from one company, but there price at about $48.00 per 
 square kilometers at minimum 192 square kilometers. They don't have 
 current pictures of our area archived. 
 
 I'm looking for other options and prices. 
 
 George 
 -- 
 WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org 
 
 Subscribe/Unsubscribe: 
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless 
 
 Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ 
--- End of Original Message ---





-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] And another attaboy for Mac.

2005-10-05 Thread George Rogato

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/08/AR2005090802058.html

Also mentions matt

George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


RE: [WISPA] satellite imaging company?

2005-10-05 Thread Brian Webster
George,
What area do you need. If this company has to fly the area to get the
images that price is good. Are you looking for color or bw, at what
resolution and for what purpose. I know of quite a few different sources but
it depends on what you are looking for.



Thank You,
Brian Webster
www.wirelessmapping.com http://www.wirelessmapping.com
Free World Dialup #481416


-Original Message-
From: George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 7:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] satellite imaging company?


Anyone have experience with buying imagery for your area from a
satellite imaging company?

I got a quote from one company, but there price at about $48.00 per
square kilometers at minimum 192 square kilometers. They don't have
current pictures of our area archived.

I'm looking for other options and prices.

George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

2005-10-05 Thread George

Not sure who is subscribed to the isp-investor list.

But this was a post today:

NextWeb put out a press release a year ago with details regarding a
4-year track record of 84~100% annual growth.  They announced sales of
$8M annually ($670K/mo) with over 2,000 subs.  Looking at those figures
mentioned one can assume 3,000 subs and $1.2M/month with sustained
growth. They are EBITDA positive.

George


G.Villarini wrote:

100 customers paying $49.95, wet-11 CPE's  NOT!!! :-)


Gino A. Villarini, 
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

G.Villarini wrote:


IIRC, Next web is a Axcellera shop . nice price tag for a unlicensed WISP.



Gino A. Villarini,




Anyone know how many subs and what the annual revenue of Next web is?
George


--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] satellite imaging company?

2005-10-05 Thread George
I was hoping to find affordable current image of my area with 
Latitude/Longitude.



George


Brian Webster wrote:

George,
What area do you need. If this company has to fly the area to get the
images that price is good. Are you looking for color or bw, at what
resolution and for what purpose. I know of quite a few different sources but
it depends on what you are looking for.



Thank You,
Brian Webster
www.wirelessmapping.com http://www.wirelessmapping.com
Free World Dialup #481416


-Original Message-
From: George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 7:06 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] satellite imaging company?


Anyone have experience with buying imagery for your area from a
satellite imaging company?

I got a quote from one company, but there price at about $48.00 per
square kilometers at minimum 192 square kilometers. They don't have
current pictures of our area archived.

I'm looking for other options and prices.

George
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/





--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


[WISPA] satellite imaging company?

2005-10-05 Thread Johann Beretta
How about Google Earth?

http://earth.google.com

The Plus version is $20/year. Gives you the ability to print or save
high res images. The Pro version is $400/year  Has a lot of features.
http://earth.google.com/earth_pro.html

A lot cheaper than the $9,216 you were quoted. Prob would still be
cheaper to get the images with Google Earth and take them to a printing
company to be printed in large scale format.

 Anyone have experience with buying imagery for your area from a 
 satellite imaging company?
 
 I got a quote from one company, but there price at about $48.00 per 
 square kilometers at minimum 192 square kilometers. They don't have 
 current pictures of our area archived.
 
 I'm looking for other options and prices.
 
 George


-- 
Johann Beretta
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

2005-10-05 Thread Blair Davis

$1,200,000 per month / 3000 subs = $400 per sub per month

Must be nice to get those kinds of rates



George wrote:


Not sure who is subscribed to the isp-investor list.

But this was a post today:

NextWeb put out a press release a year ago with details regarding a
4-year track record of 84~100% annual growth.  They announced sales of
$8M annually ($670K/mo) with over 2,000 subs.  Looking at those figures
mentioned one can assume 3,000 subs and $1.2M/month with sustained
growth. They are EBITDA positive.

George


G.Villarini wrote:


100 customers paying $49.95, wet-11 CPE's  NOT!!! :-)


Gino A. Villarini, Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.aeronetpr.com
787.767.7466

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of George
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2005 1:04 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Covad to acquire NextWeb for $23M

G.Villarini wrote:

IIRC, Next web is a Axcellera shop . nice price tag for a unlicensed 
WISP.




Gino A. Villarini,




Anyone know how many subs and what the annual revenue of Next web is?
George




--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] satellite imaging company?

2005-10-05 Thread George
I downloaded the free version of google earth and then updated to the 
pro trial version.


 Microsofts terraserver had better pictures.

Problem is the latest image is 1994, lots has changed around here in 10 
years. All I'm trying to do is current version. But I can't spend alot 
for this.


George

Johann Beretta wrote:

How about Google Earth?

http://earth.google.com

The Plus version is $20/year. Gives you the ability to print or save
high res images. The Pro version is $400/year  Has a lot of features.
http://earth.google.com/earth_pro.html

A lot cheaper than the $9,216 you were quoted. Prob would still be
cheaper to get the images with Google Earth and take them to a printing
company to be printed in large scale format.


Anyone have experience with buying imagery for your area from a 
satellite imaging company?


I got a quote from one company, but there price at about $48.00 per 
square kilometers at minimum 192 square kilometers. They don't have 
current pictures of our area archived.


I'm looking for other options and prices.

George






--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


Re: [WISPA] More Katrina Pics

2005-10-05 Thread Bob Moldashel

Rick Harnish wrote:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wispa_rick_harnish/  or do a tag search 
for katrinawireless at http://www.flickr.com/photos/tags/ to see all 
pictures which have been related to the effort so far.


 


Thanks,

 


**/Rick Harnish/**

/President/

/OnlyInternet Broadband  Wireless, Inc.///

/260-827-2482 Office/

/260-307-4000 Cell/

/260-918-4340 VoIP///

/www.oibw.net http://www.oibw.net//

**/[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/**

 


**/  /***/ http://www.oibw.net//*

 **//**

http://www.wispa.org/

 




Who is the Columbian Drug Lord with you guys??

http://www.flickr.com/photos/wispa_rick_harnish/49722158/

:-P

-B-

--
Bob Moldashel
Lakeland Communications, Inc.
Broadband Deployment Group
1350 Lincoln Avenue
Holbrook, New York 11741 USA
800-479-9195 Toll Free US  Canada
631-585-5558 Fax
516-551-1131 Cell

--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/